Author: OLD SOLDIER Posted: 2013-02-27 04:41:24 When Kwaku Baako informed us about the atrocities of Kwesi Pratt during PNDC Regime, some of us did not believe until the truth was confirmed during the NRC. Kwesi Pratt is the most dangerous Journalist Ghana had ever have, he had the gut to recommend his fellow journalists to be executed by PNDC. Pratt even recommended Baako to be killed by the regime, thank God Baako was instead touchered violently and severely but his life was spared. This is what Kwesi Pratt can do. Now Pratt is a secret agent to NDC and US Embassy in Ghana. May God forgive Pratt and spare him the untold evils that will come upon him and his generations. The souls of those journalist killed through Pratt's recommendations to PNDC will never forgive Pratt. Now Pratt has the guts to take Diplomatic Passport and smuggled his weak-headed children to work at the Ministries under Mills NDC, may God forgive Pratt and his dependance and spare them of the evils ahead of them...
BE FOCUSED AND WORK/
Author: SENABA Posted: 2013-02-27 04:58:27 WHY ARE YOU SO WORRIED ? OR YOUR PEOPLE DONT HAVE THE BRAINS TO RULE WITHOUT THEN? IT SHOWS HOW YOUR STUPID YOU AND YOUR LEADERS ARE.
WHY DIDNT BETTY/WOYOME LEAVE TAX MONEY
Author: ANANE JAMES Posted: 2013-02-27 05:12:32 WHY DIDNT THESE NDC BIGMOUTHS TELL WOYOME AND BETTYMOULD TO LEAVE TAX PAYERS' MONEY ALONE?............THIEVES BEING DEFENDED BY NDC LAWYERS.
NPP is uterly Confused!
Author: JMP Posted: 2013-02-27 05:16:18 See the comments from some of their supporters below; while the issue being commented here on is about the consititution, some are talking about Wayome! Are these the brains they boast off
selfish people
Author: abdul djalil Posted: 2013-02-27 05:20:04 If there should be an election to be conducted in those constituencies that the minority are,they would have lost the seats to the majority
This is crazy...
Author: Paa Nii Posted: 2013-02-27 05:20:39 U will achieve virtually nothing out of yr ignorance.
Re: NPP MP's should leave taxpayers money alone -
Author: Abodzraku moses Posted: 2013-02-27 05:22:51 Oh are the majority not happy? How can you be working and say critise me? they are not doing and now u are weeping heeeehhhhheee. Push through all you gagantuan bills before they start pilling up the heat on you stealer president. Saaaaaaachwe
NPP MPs ARE FOOLS, R U THERE 4 NANA ADDO
Author: HASSAN RASTA GERMANY Posted: 2013-02-27 05:36:20 STOP PAYING THEM. AND ALSO LET THEM REFUND ALL THEIR SALARIES BACK AND GO TO THE NPP TO PAY THEM. ANIMALS WHO NEVER REMEMBER WHERE THEY ARE COMING FROM JUST BECAUSE THEY HAVE WON THEIR CONSTTUENCIES SO THATS ALL. THEY DONT CARE FOR THEIR PEOPLE. THEY RATHER WANT NANA ADDO TO BE PRESIDENT BY ANY MEANS. FOOLS ARE GOING TO LOSE THEIR SITSIN NEXT 4 YEARS TO COME.
SHUT YOUR ASS OFF----....
Author: PADDY Posted: 2013-02-27 05:39:41 PLEASE SAM-GEORGE DO YOU HAVE MONEY TO GO TO COURT? YOUR UNDERMINING,WILL NOT PINNED THE NPP.SHUT YOUR ASS OFF.
Confused plaintiffs
Author: Dr Yaw Ohemeng Posted: 2013-02-27 05:48:20 I will refer the plaintiffs to Parliament's own website which has the following:
The responsibilities of your MP
"Your MP will generally do everything he or she can to help constituents but will not feel able to support every cause, nor will they be able to get the desired solution to every individual problem.
Members may not be willing to support one constituent if in doing so they will deprive another.
At times a constituent's demands may conflict with party policy and your MP will have to decide where their first loyalty should lie. The Member may think that, in any case, a majority of constituents would support the party policy - after all
that is likely to be one of the reasons why they elected him or her.
There is no statutory job description for MPs.
The Code of Conduct for Members of Parliament, the latest version of which was agreed to by the House is the nearest approximation. The purpose of the Code is “to assist Members in the discharge of their obligations to the House, their
constituents and the public at large”.
So what are they talking about? It is not a Constitutional requirement for MPs to sit in to vet ministerial nominees. They are just to be appointed subject to approval of Parliament. Have they not been appointed? Unless these plaintiffs think that the appointments are not legal because the majority abstained, which is allowed.
There is no where in the Constitution that the State of the Nation address should be before the whole of Parliament, neither is there a requirement for a debate.
You are just wasting everybody's time. Rather, implore the Supreme Court to move fast to resolve the current impasse.
Re: NPP MP's should leave taxpayers money alone -
Author: yd Posted: 2013-02-27 06:08:46 So that the thieves party ndc will enjoy all.Ewe thieves.
Re: NPP MP's should leave taxpayers money alone -
Author: Kofi Asaase Asa--- Mantukwa Posted: 2013-02-27 06:23:03 Anything made by man is not perfect. Even The Creator Himself said: 'He has regretted for creating man'.
The Constitution is the basic Law of the land. There could be mistakes. These could either be 'natural and human', or 'mistakes of time.'
This is the reason why there is the need for amendments.
The petition filed by Nana Akuffo Addo and Co. is revealing some of these weaknesses or mistakes in the constitution .
A critical scrutiny of the Constitution would show that although the drafters foresaw the need to include provisions for an aggrieved citizen of Ghana to protest, by filing a petition at the Supreme Court, they never dreamt that there would ever be such a situation in Ghana where an aggrieved citizen, would file a petition at the supreme court challenging the validity of the election of the President, and as such, they did not consider the consequences, should there be any such occurrence.
They did not visualize the probable solutions to such an issue, should it occur!
This is the core of the problems.
Had they been able to foresee any such future occurrence and its consequences, they would have included in the Constitution adequate provisions that would have taken care of most of the issues that are contained in the petition filed by these three gentlemen;
Sumaila Bielbiel, Samuel George and George Spencer.
The bottom line is that, until the Constitution is amended,one can say that these gentlemen are fighting an 'Uneccessary Lost Battle' or a 'Battle for Mirage'.
fools
Author: kek Posted: 2013-02-27 07:11:49 A name like samuel george?...foooool!
Listen to a thief?
Author: Segoe Posted: 2013-02-27 07:28:40 Why do you want NPP MPs to go and listen to this thief Mahama? If he won the elections genuinely, why your worries?
Re: NPP MP's should leave taxpayers money alone -
Author: morgan Posted: 2013-02-27 10:00:21 why should they be paid? someone should tell me.i mean the minority
re -npp mps
Author: adam alhassan Posted: 2013-02-27 13:17:28 useless npp mps,u did not recognise the president and will not participate in vetting of his ministerial nominees and athers,but will take monies that he had approved and sign to be paid to u.god will panish all the useless npp mps.
NPP MPs should leave taxpayers money alo
Author: Kofi B. Shepherd Posted: 2013-02-27 13:35:06 SUMAILA BIELBIEL?
SAMUEL GEORGE?
GEORGE SPENCER?
These three names seem to me as outlandish foreign/alien names. Are these so-called petitioners real and/or actual Ghanaians. They should first of all declare their inalienable rights to be genuine Ghanaians.
Which parts of Ghana do these patriotic individuals come from?
I think their move is an attempt to deflect attention from the real festering political problems confronting the country Ghana.
They should not 'waste our ears'!
Comments on NPP MPs should leave taxpayers money alone - Samuel George
Due to limited space we do not publish comments on comments on this page.
Regular website