88
Opinions Sat, 20 Jul 2013

Did Addison Discredit Dr Afari-Gyan?

Read Article

Comment: ADDISON IS NOT SPECIAL ATTORNEY

Author:
FATSO ADDISON
Date:
2013-07-19 21:36:00
Comment to:
Did Addison Discredit Dr Afari-Gyan?

ANYBODY CAN DO AN AUDIT OF ANY GHANA ELECTION LIKE THE GHANA 2012 TO LOOK FOR VULNERABILITIES TO UNDERMINE THE CREDIBILITY OF THE EC AND MAKE LEGAL THEORIES.

THE REALITY OF THE ISSUE IS THAT THESE ERRORS, TYPOS ETC CANNOT BE DEEMED TO BE CRIMINAL AND DELIBERATE ACTS ON THE PART OF THE EC TO ENHANCE THE CHANCES OF MAHAMA. WHERE IS THE PROOF IN THE PETITION?

IF INDEED, THE ERRORS ARE DELIBERATE DERELICTION OF DUTY AND POOR QUALITY OF WORK BY THE EC, THEN THE EC OFFICIALS SHOULD BE CHARGED AND PROSECUTED FOR SABOTAGING THE EC,

NPP CAME TO THE PETITION WITH TOO MANY ASSUMPTIONS - THAT THERE WOULD NO BE ERRORS - AND CAME OUT WITH ONLY ONE-SIDED AUDIT OF WHAT IT CONSTITUTES AS AUDIT FROM THE AREAS MAHAMA WON.

HOW CAN THE SC USE SUCH DATA TO MAKE A NATIONAL RULING? IT IS THE EC JOB, GIVEN ITS DISCRETION OF THE FACTS OF TYPICAL ELECTION REALITIES OF THE MATTERS OF THE FIELD THAT MAKE CALL TO ACCEPT OR REJECT VOTES ON THE PRACTICAL SIDE.

NPP'S PETITION IS JUST AN ACADEMIC EXERCISE IN FUTILITY.

THERE WERE MANY MATHS ERRORS IN NPP'S PETITION TOO. WHAT MAGNITTUDE OF MATH ERRORS CAN BE USED TO RESOLVE MATH ERRORS? WERE THESE OUTLINED BY THE PETITIONERS.

This article is closed for comments.

FATSO ADDISON on Jul 19, 2013 21:36
ADDISON IS NOT SPECIAL ATTORNEY
kwabena Asante on Jul 20, 2013 16:43