The Electoral Commission has resurrected its case against the flagbearer of the Progressive People's Party (PPP)by going to the Supreme Court to sustain his disqualification from the race.
"The Commission is of the firm conviction backed by the law, that candidates seeking the highest office of the land, must take full responsibility for ensuring that their nomination forms meet the standard in form and substance, required by the law.
"The Commission is further of the view that falsified signatures on nomination forms constitute a matter for criminal investigation and are not mere anomalies or clerical errors, which should be pointed out to candidates for corrections to be effected.
"The Commision believes that, as in other jurisdictions, presidential candidates must ensure the accuracy of the information on documents which they present under oath to public institutions. Failure to place this burden on the shoulders of the candidates, has serious implications for our democratic growth and electoral justice.
"In the interest of public policy and the credibility of the electoral process, the Commission has today filed an application at the Supreme Court to quash the High Court decision and seek clarity on the relevant aspects of the law on candidate nominations," the EC said in a statement.
- EC sets February 13 deadline for political parties to submit audited accounts
- My wife is fair – IEA founder defends EC boss
- If my wife is NPP or NDC and so what? - IEA boss defends EC chair
- Don’t mistreat us in 2020 – Nduom warns EC Boss
- Nduom chides EC boss for causing his poor show in 2016 elections
- Read all related articles