The Judicial Committee of the Eastern Regional House of Chiefs has upheld the legitimacy of Daasebre Ayimadu II in a crucial judgment delivered on an appeal case filed against similar ruling of the judicial committee of the Akyem Abuakwa Traditional Council by the appellant- royal Akanwenem family of Akyem Kwabeng.
Delivering the judgment the Judicial Committee of the Regional House of Chiefs said the “appellant failed to establish that due processes were not followed in the enstoolment of the 8th defendant-Daasebre Ayimadu II.”
It, therefore, upheld the earlier ruling by the Judicial Committee of Akyem Abuakwa Traditional Council that per the evidence on record the proper customary steps were followed to enstool him as Kwabenghene.
It also upheld that no other person should style himself as Akyem Kwabenghene apart from Daasebre Ayimadu II with a call on the factions to reconcile and push for development in Akyem Kwabeng.
A cost of GH¢20, 000 was awarded against the Appellant.
The judgment triggered confusion at the premises of the Eastern Regional House of Chiefs as faction supporting the appellant-accused the jubilation faction of the defendants of bribing the panellists of paramount chiefs and a Judge who sat on the case though without evidence.
Amidst threats of causing Mayhem in the community, it took the intervention of the Police at the premise for law and order to return.
Akyem Kwabeng stool and litigation
The Akyem Kwabeng stool has been wrecked by litigation for about 32 years now. Installation of previous chiefs has therefore, been characterized by tension and pockets of violent clashes.
It is unsurprisingly after the demise of the late Chief- Daasebre Aboagye Oware Nkwantabusa II in 2014, the dispute resurfaced strongly leading to heightened tension and clashes.
The two main factions—Asona Akanwenem and Mmabaduam families both installed parallel Chiefs. While the Asona Akanwenem family swiftly installed -Brigadier General C.K.A.A Awity, a military officer with the stool name Daasebre Oti Bruku II, the Mmabaduam family also enstooled Addison Kwabena Boateng Nuamah, with stool the name Nana Ayimadu II on June 6, 2018.
But even before the event could take place, the Abuasuapanin of the royal Asona Akanwenem family of Kwabeng, Barfour Oduro Firikyi, instructed his lawyers at Oseawuo Chambers to petition the Eastern Regional Minister and copied the Atiwa West District Chief Executive, the Regional Police Commander and the Divisional Police Commander against the intended installation stating that “the purported installation is without the consent and authority of the royal Akanwenem family at Kwabeng” who are the kingmakers of the land.
He questioned the authority of DM Ofori-Atta, Secretary to Okyenhene in supervising the ceremony having filed a petition which was pending before the judicial committee of the Akyem Abuakwa Traditional Council concerning who is eligible to succeed the late chief.
The enstoolment, however, went on and coronation was held on Monday, June 25, 2018, and subsequently sworn to the Paramount Chief of the Akyem Abuakwa Kingdom, Osagyefo Amoatia Ofori Panin.
The Akanwenem family contended that it is the sole legitimate royal to occupy the stool however, the Supreme Court ruled all three families –Asona Akanwenem, Asona Mmabaduam and Asona Kokoben are also entitled to the stool, therefore, must rotate.
The Kwabeng Stool is the Gyaase Division of the Akyem Abuakwa which is synonymous to the role of a Chief of Staff in democratic Presidential governance. This makes the Stool crucial to the effective functioning of the Akyem Abuakwa Traditional Council.
The Ankobehene of Kwabeng Barfuor Agyare Otafregya told Starr News ‘the Mmabaduam family is committed to peace and Unity but the Asona Akanwenem Family have always been causing trouble in the community.”
Alhaji Mustapha Boateng, a business mogul who is an indigene of Kwabeng and an Elder in the Babaduam family appealed to all residents to rally support behind Daasebre Ayimadu II to bring development to the community which has been lagging behind due to the chieftaincy dispute.