Alan or Nana which is which?

It seems that many people do not really have a clear idea of what the ALAN THIEF and the NANA POTHEAD stand for in politics. Some of them seem to think that there is great difference between them and that they are just not two sides of one coin, so to speak.

Now, it is very important here to understand that we are talking about the real political thief and the real political pothead in the Danquah-Busia political shibboleth. Alan Thief, by the nature of where he is coming from and on the right side of Danquah-Busia hole, where there is an inherent believe that all the nation's wealth should be with the Asante kingdom while Nana Pothead from the left side in that hole has a different inherited view that the actual wealth must be share equally between his Akyem mafias and Asante Kingdom. The problem here is that Busia side feels that the Akyem side was part of the one Kingdom of which they all have one King to swear allegiance to but their breakaway stand had made them outsiders so far as sharing the country's wealth is taken into account.

No one can dispute this fact if you look at the manner Kuffour turned Ghana into Asante Kingdom. We know all the tens of billion of dollars belonging to the nation that find its way crudely and corruptly into about 98% of the Kuffour Asante mafia.

Again I stress here that we are talking about true Thieves and Potheads. Not the small minority fake ones, who pretend to be someone they are actually not. And not their small southern and northern sympathiser ones, who have no convictions at all and change their views all the time, depending on what suits them more at this or that moment.

So, the main difference between the Thieves and Potheads in politics is their attitude to their inherited faith. But there is another difference which comes out naturally out of that: Pothead politicians tend to often masquerade themselves as Thief ones, if only to undermine their political opponents and confuse the voters on the side of Alan Thief. But politicians on the Thief side never, I stress this, never pretend to be Pothead. Because you cannot be Sika Gua and adopt views that go against your faith.

You cannot, for example, begin to think, like the Pothead does, that you can build Sika Gua’s Kingdom in Ghana, meaning create a Danquah-Busia society free of all Sika Gua agenda that would benefit all its members (Danquah-Busia) and who would be equal, even if they have no responsibilities for anything and do not contribute to the fraternity. This is, of course, anti Sika Gua utopia. This would be going against one of their main dogmas of the sky dropping stool faith that states that it is impossible to build their Kingdom in Ghana. So, when you hear supposedly the Thief politician promised to improve the working conditions of teachers, revamp education, road infrastructure and revive the economy to raise the Gross Domestic Product to provide jobs and cash for Ghanaians and even their Christian bishops and archbishops talk about the need to make everyone equal it means that they have absolutely no idea of what they are talking about and that they are not really honest in their minds. It will be very very difficult for the sun to set on them this time at where they come from because God will never trust them in the dark.

Theirs is not the founder's idea. Theirs is Sika Guasm, and I have seen this horrible utopia in action during Kuffour's eight years ethnocratic policies. And it was vile and very horrible. It is actually extreme in its views on everything. Some people even say that it is a form of satanism. Because one of the three temptations that the devil had used in the desert, while trying to seduce Christ, was to tell Him that He could have all the glory and the power on earth if he swear allegiance to him, the devil, that is. But Christ did not fall for this trick and said that you can only worship one God who is above and not on this earth. Now you understand why Ghana a republic has to have one leader at a time not that type of kingdom thief man pretending to be a true member of the nation.

And that is where we can be enslaved by the devil, if we fall for his trick and accept the idea that you can actually build a Sika Gua’s Kingdom in Ghana to create a happy Ghana where everyone would be equal and free and prosperous. And some southerners and northerners fall into this trap too. But what can you expect from them, if even their Christian Bishops and Archbishops have been tricked by the devil to swear allegiance to the so...

Thief politicians, of course, would often bang on about their faith and their Christianity, like Kuffour did and still does. But people like Kuffour have no real understanding of founder's Ghana because their political views are contradictory to its main dogmas. It is like being a prostitute and a faithful wife at the same time. It just does not work like that.

So my concluding point is this: the true Thief always has a distorted view of Nkrumah's Ghana and even tends to think of itself as one. That is how it happened with Chief Thief Kuffour. Pothead, on the other hand, is always non Sika Gua. That is why the Pothead gets it right more often than the Thief does but that alone is not enough to become president of Ghana because he is still part of that DB Thievery dogma even though he is non sika gua. The fact is both of them will never win the presidency because of the canker Kuffour has left behind.

Aba Wilson