Some of us are really amazed on the sudden influx of experts on all sorts of subjects in Ghana, who are often called upon to give an expert opinion on a variety of issues of public interests.
In the past, some of us raised grave concerns and further expressed scepticisms on the puzzling analyses expounded by some of the experts.
In fact, our incertitude somehow became heightened during the public discourse on the recent arrest and retrieval of arms and munitions from a group of men who were allegedly plotting to destabilise the peace and security of the country.
Apparently, I had an opportunity to listen to several security experts on the topic under discussion, and I must, however, confess that some of the analyses leave much to be desired.
In fact, I was extremely flabbergasted to hear a certain security expert venturing to dare the security agencies somewhat bizarrely that the calibre of arms and munitions found in the possession of the suspects cannot even ‘end the life of a church mouse’, let alone staging a coup d’état.
Of course, it is possible that one may require a stockpile of arms and munitions to embark on a successful coup d’état.
But is that all it takes to stage a successful coup d’état?
Even though I am not a security expert, common sense will tell me that it could also be possible for one to use a single makeshift rifle and kitchen knives to stage a coup d’état.
Well, in the interest of national security, I will skip over the possible question of how and why coup making enthusiasts can plan a coup d’état with a single makeshift rifle and bread knives and leave the dearest readers to put the straddled jigsaw together.
As a matter of fact, we are a nation fond of bestowing accolades on individuals unnecessarily.
It is an illustrative case of a nation of superfluous experts with debatable expertise.
Who is an expert?
For the purposes of this periodical, I will define an expert as “a person with a high degree with skill in, or knowledge of a particular subject (Oxford English Dictionary).”
“An expert, more generally, is a person with extensive knowledge or ability based on research, experience or occupation in a particular area of study (Wikipedia.org).”
In fact, out of curiosity, I took time off my schedule to conduct a research on some of the ‘acclaimed’ experts in Ghana, but to my utter surprise, I could not find a single useful publication by any of the known experts. How bizarre?
What is expertise?
Expertise is the dexterity of an individual to apply the acquired skill or knowledge,---also known as the motivation to transfer.
In other words, the level of expertise may be measured by highlighting the expert’s know how, experience and the amount of time spent in a particular field or area.
In the grand scheme of things, an expert must have an unfailing skills, experience, competency, knowledge and ability to undertake actions.
In theory, the acquired experience and the amount of time that one has spent in a particular field or area are essential. Nevertheless, there is a correlation between the level of experience and the level of expertise.
Let us for example, ponder over individuals who have been playing the guitar or learning how to play the piano for years if not decades, but are stuck at a low level of adeptness (Ericsson, Krampe, & Tesch-Römer, 1993).
Unfortunately, however, based on vague apprehension of an expert, we, Ghanaians, would blithesomely refer to every higher degree achiever as an expert.
The overarching question however is: does every higher degree achiever have expertise to transfer to the general public? I do not think so.
In Ghana today, you hear all sorts of experts, ranging from security, communication, labour, energy, governance, sanitation, finance to marketing, among others.
But the big question is: do the experts really have the superlative expertise to transfer?
In sum, whether the so-called experts have the needed expertise to transfer to the wider population is a million dollar question.
Send your news stories to and features to . Chat with us via WhatsApp on +233 55 2699 625.