But determination alone is not enough! There are other essential ingredients; a clear vision of where we want to go, a plan of action to attain that vision, and the person to lead the march. Now, it is up to us to find and apply the other ingredients towards our march to the promised land. Thank God, Ghana@50 has offered us yet another opportunity to chart a new course. We must seize it, and never look back. As we embark on our journey towards Ghana@100, our leadership must clearly articulate the vision and get the buy-in from the people. Above all, we must accompany the vision with a clear blueprint for its attainment.
Missed Opportunities
In 1957, Dr. Kwame Nkrumah had a vision. Beyond the idea of an independent Ghana and the mandate to shape our own destiny, he also saw the potential for a great and united Africa. The rest of the country, including his political opponents, was with him, at least on the need for Ghana’s independence and self-rule. His domestic plans were very far-reaching, and for all intents and purposes, they were very well-thought-out. Some of the projects that were implemented under those plans are living testimonials of Nkrumah’s visionary leadership, for they continue to provide our nation with very essential services even today. The Akosombo Dam and the Accra-Tema Motorway are clear examples of those.
Nkrumah’s “Consolidation Plan (1957-9)” covered the first two years after independence. It was introduced to allow time for the government to consolidate in preparation for the launch of a more far-reaching “Five Year Development Plan, 1959-64”. In 1962, his “Work and Happiness” program was proclaimed to further his development policies that were largely based on socialist principles. That was a hit in Ghana, and it came with its own marketing tools to boot. While our neighbors in Nigeria were engaged in a bitter civil war trying to break their country into two, our nation’s radios were filled with motivational tunes: “Work & Happiness, .....I Will Do My Best, .....All Must Do Their Best, …..For Beautiful Ghana…..”. I can still hear the sounds from far away, coming out of a battery-operated, Ghana-made Akasonoma radio set on a Saturday afternoon! Then in March 1964, building on the work of previous plans, the “Seven Year Development Plan” was launched.
All these plans recognized the urgent need for human development, and very significant resources were allocated for their implementation. A big part of that was the creation of schools, primary, middle and secondary, across the country. Teacher training institutions and universities were built. State-owned enterprises were created, and out of these, numerous employment opportunities were created for our people. The mindset of the young was constantly being prepared for love of their country, and for them to develop a sense of belief in themselves. Who can forget the youth and their leaders in the Ghana Young Pioneer Movement?
To a large extent, those plans worked quite well for our country, at least until 1966. The fact that they could not be sustained is a clear indication that all was not well. So you see, vision alone is not enough! Indeed, something was always missing. I can mention three unfortunate shortcomings:
Ghana’s foreign-policy agenda under Nkrumah was too ambitious for our nation, considering our circumstances at the time. We were too young a nation at the time, and we had hardly any experience in nation-building. Our resources were not enough to address our own domestic needs, not to mention the political, and sometimes, economic needs of other African countries. Surely, this was a key tenet of Kwame Nkrumah’s ideological policies. Our support for African liberation was very laudable, but our alignment with socialist causes around the globe made us targets of other nations with opposing interests. An important lesson from this is that, in today’s inter-dependent world, we must always be mindful of our international associations, because in the final analysis, those have significant bearings on how far we reach.
Nkrumah’s political strategies created a great deal of mistrust in the minds of his political opponents. His activities from the time he was invited to coordinate the affairs of the UGCC as the General Secretary, through the formation of his own CPP, and finally with the Preventive Detention Act, had created mistrust and bitterness among his political opponents. Clearly, these were seeds that were sewn inadvertently to undermine the future of our country, although we can only appreciate that from hindsight. The military coup that took place in 1966 was, no doubt, a direct result of this. Even if the coup had been initiated from elsewhere, there were elements within the country that were willing collaborators for the destabilization of our dear nation. The political landscape that had been created before our independence and shortly after was a landmine along our path to true independence. In fact, the seeds that were sown are still ripe with us today. We have to overcome them!
There was no clear plan of succession which would ensure the continuation of any development plans and policies, even if the entire nation was behind them. Somehow, our people had grown up with the obvious naiveté, that Nkrumah never dies, and that this great leader was going to be around for ever. Leaders die, because they are human, but great nations must live on and progress. We have to re-orient our mindset and understand that a change in leadership does not constitute a change in our national destination.
There may be other factors that contributed to halt our progressive march towards our destiny in the aftermath of our independence, but these alone were enough to cause a major hiccup in any nation’s fortunes. After the attainment of independence, our inability to sustain the forward march as a result of the upheavals in 1966 was our first missed opportunity.
Our second missed opportunity occurred in the aftermath of the 1979 upheavals. I was not around when the events started, but all accounts point to the fact that it was an unusually popular uprising. Our nation’s fortunes had begun to sink with the intervention of the military in 1966. Our attempt to restore order with the return to civilian rule in 1969 had been thwarted once again in 1972 by the military. With no real plans, and no experience in governance, these military leaders had undertaken a rather risky gamble with the fortunes of our dear nation. By 1979, we had sunk to the bottom.
The people needed a saviour, and true to the old adage that “every nation deserves its leaders”, another bunch of military adventurers assumed the reigns of leadership. Just as today, the people were yearning to get somewhere, anywhere, because like the people of Israel, they were suffering. The fact that precious lives were being sacrificed for a change in their situation did not matter to them. They were willing to pay any price to get out of the mess they were in. If only our leaders could recognize the opportunity that had been created out of that unfortunate situation, and if only they had created a much clearer vision with a well-thought-out plan, perhaps our nation would not have yearned so much for a change as was witnessed in the year 2000.
Fortunately, six years on, a new spirit is emerging in Ghana. There is a refreshing attitude in the Ghanaian psyche that seems to say “We can do it”. It started in Germany at the World Cup, and it surfaced rather ferociously at the Ghana@50 celebrations. Currently in London, the Queen of England, together with the Government of the United Kingdom, is hosting the President of Ghana in a historic visit to the U.K. The high point of it is a three-day stay in Buckingham Palace for the President and his wife. The scenes coming from England are majestic, and every well-meaning Ghanaian cannot help but acclaim that, “Clearly, this is it! Third time lucky, this is our opportunity! Oman Ghana, our time has come!”
The GNP must be the master plan for the nation, and any successive government that comes into power must be under obligation to implement the plan from where it has reached. The execution of the plan must be subjected to a review every five years, to ensure that successive governments continue to follow the plan. Each five-year interval must be associated with well-defined milestones, with explicit targets for achievement. Indeed, the achievement of those targets must be used to measure the accomplishments, and for that matter, the success or failure of successive governments.
The implementation of the GNP must be tracked over the fifty-year period. A statutory body must be set up with the responsibility of ensuring that indeed the GNP is being implemented, and that the targets are being pursued. The initial makeup of this body may be the designers of the original plan. Obviously, the GNP will have to undergo periodic reviews to ensure that it keeps up with new developments in technology and other areas of challenge that are bound to come up with time. A way of appointing membership to this body must be found to ensure that it continues to be expert-based, fairly represented, and that it continues to be based on the same principle; the unadulterated pursuit of the national agenda. The United States Supreme Court and how it is constituted, can be used as a model for the GNP coordinating council.
These are nothing but ideas just meant to start a debate. The best will be achieved when all of us, young and old, men and women, home and abroad, all feel the urge and take a step to make a contribution. In the end, the Ghana that we all desire, the Black Star of Africa, will surely emerge.