Menu

Ghana's Democracy in Peril: Governance gridlock sparks constitutional crisis

Parliament House FotoJet(10) Parliament House FotoJet(10) Parliament House FotoJet(10) Parliament House

Thu, 24 Oct 2024 Source: Kwame Adzaho-Amenortor

The recent power struggle between the Supreme Court and the 8th Parliament of Ghana’s fourth republic has highlighted the urgent need for constitutional reforms to strengthen the country's democratic institutions.

The friction between these two key branches of government has raised concerns about the stability and effectiveness of Ghana's democracy.

The Apex Court, as the highest court in the land, plays a crucial role in interpreting and upholding the Constitution.

Parliament, on the other hand, is also responsible for enacting laws and representing the interests of the people.

The New Patriotic Party (NPP) MPs took a bold step by writing to the Supreme Court to challenge Speaker Alban Gbagbin's decision to declare four parliamentary seats vacant.

This move ultimately led to the Supreme Court staying the execution of the Speaker's ruling.

In essence, the NPP MPs contested the Speaker's decision, and the Supreme Court's intervention temporarily halted the implementation of that decision.

The National Democratic Congress (NDC) MPs supported the Speaker's ruling, while the New Patriotic Party (NPP) MPs aligned with the Supreme Court's decision.

Implications of Ruling:

This situation highlights the tensions between Ghana's legislative and judicial branches, particularly in the lead-up to critical elections.

The National Democratic Congress (NDC) MPs supported the Speaker's ruling, while the New Patriotic Party (NPP) MPs aligned with the Supreme Court's decision.

This split reflects the complex political landscape in Ghana.

The Speaker's decision was significant, especially with Ghana's December elections looming.

The vacant MPs controversy in Ghana is heating up

The four affected MPs, Cynthia Morrison (Agona West), Kojo Asante (Suhum), Andrew Asiamah (Fomena), and Peter Kwakye Ackah (Amenfi Central), had filed to contest the 2024 general election as independent candidates, which led to their seats being declared vacant by the Speaker of Parliament.

This decision was met with resistance from the New Patriotic Party (NPP) MPs, who petitioned the Supreme Court to challenge the Speaker's ruling.

The Supreme Court intervened, staying the execution of the Speaker's decision, effectively suspending the declaration of the seats as vacant.

The situation has sparked an intense debate about the country's electoral laws and the role of independent candidates in Ghana's politics.

The National Democratic Congress (NDC) and NPP MPs have converged on the majority side of the parliamentary divide, highlighting the complexity of the issue.

This development highlights the complex interplay between Ghana's legislative and judicial branches, particularly in the lead-up to critical elections.

A healthy and functional democracy requires a harmonious relationship between these two branches, where each branch respects the boundaries of its authority and works together for the common good.

However, the recent power struggle has demonstrated that the current constitutional framework may not be adequate to prevent conflicts between the Apex Court and the Parliament.

The ambiguity and overlapping powers granted to these two branches have created a fertile ground for disagreements and political manoeuvring.

The friction between the Apex Court and the 8th Parliament of the Fourth Republic has manifested in several ways. For example, the Apex Court has issued rulings that have been challenged or disregarded by the Parliament.

The Parliament has also passed laws that have been declared unconstitutional by the Apex Court. These actions have led to a stalemate and a breakdown in the democratic process.

The ongoing power struggle has also had negative consequences for the country.

It has created uncertainty and instability, which can deter investors and erode public confidence in the government.

It has also diverted attention from pressing national issues, such as poverty, unemployment, and education.

To address these challenges, there is a clear need for constitutional reforms to strengthen the institutional capacities of the Apex Court and the Parliament.

These reforms should aim to clarify the powers and responsibilities of each branch, establish clear mechanisms for resolving disputes, and promote cooperation and accountability.

Background:

The Supreme Court of Ghana made a significant decision on October 18, 2024, halting the execution of Speaker Alban Gbagbin's ruling that declared four parliamentary seats vacant.

This development came just a day after the Speaker's initial declaration on October 17, 2024.

Essentially, the Supreme Court's stay of execution suspended the implementation of the Speaker's ruling.

The Speaker's decision was significant, especially with Ghana's December elections looming.

Key Issues at Stake:

Speaker Alban Bagbin: Declared four parliamentary seats vacant, sparking the controversy.

NPP MPs' Petition: The NPP MPs wrote to the Supreme Court to challenge the Speaker's decision.

Supreme Court's Intervention: The Supreme Court stayed the execution of the Speaker's ruling, effectively suspending the decision.

Constitutional Ambiguities: The controversy has exposed ambiguities in Ghana's constitution regarding independent candidates and vacancy declarations.

Electoral Law Reforms: The incident has reignited calls for reforms to clarify the process for independent candidates and prevent similar disputes in the future.

Party Politics: The situation has heightened tensions between the NDC and NPP, with each side seeking to capitalize on the issue for political gain.

Some possible reforms include:

* Amending the constitution to define more clearly the powers and responsibilities of the Supreme Court and the Parliament.

* Establishing a clear hierarchy of courts to prevent conflicts between the Supreme Court and lower courts.

* Creating a mechanism for resolving disputes between the Supreme Court and the Parliament, such as a joint parliamentary committee or a constitutional review commission.

* Strengthening the oversight mechanisms of the Parliament to ensure that the government is accountable to the people.

* Promoting public education on the role of the Supreme Court and the Parliament in the democratic process.

By implementing these reforms, Ghana can strengthen its democratic institutions and ensure that the Apex Court and the Parliament work together effectively for the benefit of the country.

A strong and stable democracy is essential for Ghana's progress and prosperity.

God bless our homeland Ghana and make our nation great and strong.

Columnist: Kwame Adzaho-Amenortor