I will certainly put my mortgage on Bawumia to safeguard Ghana’s bauxite, but not Mahama

You may believe it or not, observers are of the opinion that the most telling of all the numerous scandals which took place during the Mahama administration, was the 30 years bauxite mining lease issued by the Ghana Mineral Commission to Exton Cubic, the partners of his sibling, Ibrahim Mahama, on 29th December 2016, just a little over one week for his brother’s government to exit power.

Some concerned Ghanaians are thus inferring that since the NDC 2024 flagbearer, former President Mahama has promised somewhat impertinently that in the event of returning to the presidency, the collapsed banks licences will be restored, he could well review the revoked mining licences.

If my memory serves me right, the only company, whose mining licences were rightly revoked by the Supreme Court of Ghana, was the Exton Cubic, his sibling Ibrahim Mahama’s partners.

Apparently, there are those that are pondering over the possibility of former President Mahama being immersed in a gamut of emotions over the apex court’s rational decision on the granting of ‘3 mining leases in favour of Exton Cubic, the partners of his sibling, Mr Ibrahim Mahama, which the court deemed as in breach of the Constitution and section 12 of the Minerals and Mining Act, Act 703’.

Back then, some of us, as a matter of principle, deemed it unfair for former President Mahama to assume somewhat spuriously that it was rather Akufo-Addo, who without recourse to the law, arbitrarily prevented Exton Cubic from mining Ghana’s bauxite.

If you may recall, somewhere in 2017, the then Economic Advisor to the Vice President (Dr Bawumia), Dr Gideon Boako, revealed that the opposition National Democratic Congress (NDC) has no moral right cautioning the NPP administration against leveraging Ghana’s natural resources, specifically bauxite through its partnership with China, since the Mahama’s administration capriciously gave away 58 percent of Ghana’s bauxite concession to Ibrahim Mahama, the sibling of former President Mahama (See: NDC sold 58% of bauxite concession to Ibrahim Mahama – Gideon Boako; citifmonline.com, 29/06/2017).

Unsurprisingly, many concerned Ghanaians refused to remit their fury in condemnation and fretted thy souls with curses over the seemingly cloudy deal.

The concerned Ghanaians rightly ventilated their arousing disgust and contended passionately that such a venture was nepotistic and therefore must not and cannot be allowed to proceed without challenging its authenticity.

Consequently, the Exton Cubic’s permit to undertake prospecting in the Nyinahini Forest Reserve was contested in somewhere August 2017 by the then Lands and Natural Resources Minister, Mr John-Peter Amewu.

If you would remember, the Ashanti Regional Minister, Simon Osei Mensah, seized the equipment belonging to Exton Cubic, as Exton Cubic was accused of prospecting without a valid documentation at the Nyinahini bauxite concession.

Subsequently, the multi-billion cedi bauxite concession granted to Exton Cubic was revoked in September 2017 after the former Natural Resources Minister, John Peter Amewu, contested vehemently that the contract to Exton Cubic was invalid.

Mr Amewu argued poignantly and forthrightly that Exton Cubic did not have the necessary documentation to undertake mining (dailyguideafrica.com, 24/11/2017).

Nevertheless, the leadership of the Exton Cubic argued forcefully that the revocation of licenses and the confiscation of mining equipment were unfair as Exton Cubic was in possession of three required permits.

As it was expected, the leadership of Exton Cubic took the matter to the High Court of Ghana, and, on February 8, 2018, the High Court ruled that, the erstwhile Lands and Natural Resources Minister, John Peter Amewu, did not have power to revoke the mining licenses granted to Exton Cubic to prospect for bauxite.

Subsequently, the Attorney General, acting on behalf of the Ministry of Lands and Natural Resources, duly submitted an ex-parte application to the Apex court, contending vehemently and purposefully that ‘the lower court’s decision ‘undermines efficient administration of justice’.

The justices of the Supreme Court of Ghana, in their wisdom, concurred with the Attorney-General, and made it clear that their verdict was predicated on the fact that the Exton Cubic knowingly or unknowingly failed to comply with the mandatory provisions of the Minerals and Mining Act and article 268 of the Constitution of Ghana.

The eminent Supreme Court Judges, therefore, maintained that the granting of ‘3 mining leases in favour of Exton Cubic was in breach of the Constitution and section 12 of the Minerals and Mining Act, Act 703’.

We should, however, not lose sight of the fact that, “every mineral in its natural state in, under or upon land in Ghana, rivers, streams, water-courses throughout the country, the exclusive economic zone and an area covered by the territorial sea or continental shelf is the property of the Republic and is vested in the President in trust for the people of Ghana” (Minerals Act 2006).

In the grand scheme of things, we cannot and must not allow individuals to roam carelessly on the corridors of power and capriciously take over Ghana’s scarce resources to the detriment of the poor and disadvantaged Ghanaians.

I would like to stress that in order for our governance system to be fair and equitable, all political appointments and contracts offers must be based on merits, but not through vague coloration, nepotism and cronyism.

The credit must, therefore, be given to over six million discerning Ghanaians for rightly voting to safeguard Ghana’s bauxite during the 2020 general elections.

K. Badu, UK.

k.badu2011@gmail.com