15
Opinions Sat, 17 Jul 2010

Kosmos Hired Assasins?

ECONOMIC HIT SQUAD AT WORK

Comrade Guy,

It may be possible that Obama may be misguided in following the

typical US imperilaists agenda in Afghanistan and Ghana government (AU

Government), in the case of Kosmos, Exsson Mobile, Fobbs Magazen, the

USA citizens are not as stupid and senseless as we are clearly

exhibiting in Ghana and AU. With all due respect I some time ask

myself, if the term Socialist is synonimous with insanity? Just I have

problems with the inhumane evilness called African verson of

Capitalism, I cannot deny a lot of characteristics of insanity that

goes with the African so called Socialists. sometimes I spend hours

wondering or brooding over the question; what exactly do we on the

land of African and Aricans world wide want in this world?

The concepts of Socialism and Capitalism, is primarily about wealth

redistrbution which in turn explains the kind of justice each get from

his/her society. In the USA, the citizens are fighting for how to

effectively and efficiently disrtibute the wealth of their nation;

whites or blacks. In order to maximize this distribution effort it

become advantagious to rubb other nations of their wealth to be added

to the stock of wealth of the USA government, so that the total stock

of wealth that will be available for distribution will be much more to

go round. This in turn goes a long way in deciding the kind of justice

each realistically will be getting. For example, if a person end up

stealling an item because he/she is hungry as an Amercan citizen and

in the course of this, the owner(s) of the stollen items who are also

American citizens ended up hitting and beating the individual for

stealling what belong to them, what kind of justice can we say the

person is given? Bearing in mind, 95% of normal humanbeings will not

steal if they are gainfully employed, increasing the employment base

thus reduces the possibility of another person beating another one for

stealling his/her items as with a job, comes an income with which each

could be able to buy their basic needs of life like; food, clothing

and shelter.

Crude oil and other natural resources are very essentail elements in

the modern production of goods and services as essential inputs. Thus

in the lives of the gaint USA industries that employ people enmass for

income to be earn, all uses these natural resources to sustain

production of goods and services. Therefore, the journy of going into

other lands to get this natural resources is in reality the survival

of the fittest in the world of justice of the fittest. In truth, no

two people face judgement by the same judge and both coming out right.

That is why every scale have two sides, which are right and wrong. The

losser and the winner. The conquererd and the conquerer. The living

and the dead. The slave and the master. The strong and the weak. The

owned and the owner. the oppressed and the oppressor.

What the Americans are therefore doing in any part of the world (which

fortunately and unfortunately, belong to us all) is to get justice for

themselves, just the way we all leave our houses to another place in

search of food for survival. Who then blame Barak Obama as the

president and citizen of the USA in working for the interest of his

nation? To you they are imperilaists and vampires but to them they are

innocent people that just have to survive at the cost of other foolish

living things whose brain is less functional in accordance with the

normal standared expected of human beings brains.

Comrade guy, I am smelling a kind of "moralists" sentiments in you. I

do not want to believe this but consciousely or inconsciously, this

seem to be the case. I beleive that this is from your own

subconsciouseness but that is just your reality. You are just a victim

like most of us whose past intergenerational frustration out of our

inherited unfortunate limiting circumstances, to resort to the culture

of appealling to moral sympathy and attention of your oppressors or

others, than our own ability as a people.

It is very important for us all to recognize the fact that it is one

thing to be morally right of which 90% of our concerns of Africa with

the West ern powers are. However our ability (power as it is today) is

unfortunately not good enough to legitimized and actualize our

legitimate concerns. In addition to the immoral claims of the USA and

other EU member state governments on the African continent, these

states also have the ability (power) to legitimze their claims and

concerns. Thus, illegimate as most of the none Africans concerns may

be, they always turn out to be legitimize by the power of the

developed nations as against the weakneses of the African Unionm under

developed member states.

One of the few individuals born and bred on the land of Africa that

understood this challenge and committed his life to addressing it is

Osagyfo Dr. Kwami Nkrumah. Like you Guy informed us that you were a

mature person in the days of Nkrumah and thus knews him than most of

us who were todlers even if born in the Era of Kwami Nkrumah's Ghana,

you will not doubt confirm the late president passion and zeal to the

African common challenge. Nkrumah was very practical about the OAU as

compared to most of his contemporaries who saw the project as a

pileline dream. Undetered, Kwami made his mark enugh to creat a

starting platform for those of us alive today to advance from where he

stopped out of the circumstances of his time. Just like in the days of

Kwami Nkrumah's Africa, a lot of our fellow compatroits at all level

of our political starta, still live in an elusive world of belief that

the state Ghana is more than capable to solve the problem of Africa by

itself, rather than on the platform of the AU comparising the 53

member states. Sad enough, some of the most unrepentant neocolnilsist

psycho- dogmatic zombies of this school of thought are even among the

most noisy in the middle of CPP (Convention People Party) today. Like

the pharasees did with Moses and Jesus Christ, they sing Nkrumah and

Pan Africanism than Africa itself, yet the neo-colonial demon in them

is beyond any reasonal discusion as far as the concerns of Ghana are.

Kwami Nkrumah every minute of his life never fail to echo the call

reminding the Ghanaian and every AU (OAU) member state citizens, at

the least opportunity that "no single African country will liberate

itself from the shackles of imperialism as long as we continue to work

individually". And that " one by one, the imperialist will return

every one of us from this brief indpendence that we have just gain

back to where wer were before this hard won freedom".

Today, nobody in his/her right frame of mind, looking at the lives of

the majority of our citizens across the vast land of Africa, as gainst

the lives of our few elite which was exactly the case before our

independence will say that Osagyfor was not absolutly right. In fact

the creation of some few elite to manage the vast majority of the

African population was the original plan of the colonial master. It

was exactly what Kwami Nkrumah come to fight against and this was the

very reason why he was overthrown at all cost. The prophesy has been

fullfilled. It has come to pass and from the way we even analyse the

concerns, it is not looking like we do understand the problem.

Most of our people are not aware of the recent Chinese policy of

relocating 3 million of their population into africa with 1/3 of these

people already on our land. Most of us are also not aware or preview

to letters writen by some Europeans in the early days of the last two

centuries among whom is Evolutionists- Charls Dwaine explaining how

there were going to be replacing the then inhabitant of Africa refered

to as the Negros with other beings,. This action resulted in filling

Africa with Indians, other Asians, whites from Europe and the removal

of some indegenous people to other lands, like the Americas and the

Careabian Islands. At the moment, there is an exposed documentary

intention of the USA governemt to relocate some of its citizens on the

land of Africa. In fact, the implimentation of all these plans are

well in their advance states.

All these actions of relocating people on the land of Africa aimed to

sustain the interest of their home state (country) against the

interest of the man on the land of Africa. In fact this approach,

according to Dawin and his biological collegues, do work as the

settlers serve as a catalysts the frustrate the local population into

working in accordance to the will of the external interest.

The trick is that the powerful external force serve as the protector

of ther relocated population who live daily under constantthreat of

the hostile local population. So in return for the protection given to

the resettled populetion, the foreign power give the reloatec citizens

the encouragement to frustrate the local effort and retain the foreigh

power support wo are their kinsmen to assumed economic and

consequently political power of their new home. This approach has

worked very well in South Africa, Zimbabwe and Isreal. The latest

project of this sort is the resettlement programe of the USA citizens

in Dafour State being carved out of Sudan. Of course Israel was

created out of Palastain admist all sorts of opposition and hostility,

that still linger on till today. Who said Kwami Nkrumah never foresaw

all these?

The big question some of us continue to ask is what exactly is the

plan of the AU? What exactly is ghana doing in the AU? How much does

it actually cost the Ghanaian tax payer to maintain the AU? What

exactly is the use of the AU to the Ghanaian government and the people

at large? What would Nkrumah have done if he is confronted with the

challenges of Ghana and the AU as it is today? Could we percieve

Nkrumah as an ordinary Ghanaian because he (Nkrumah) was a Ghanaian

like any one of us before he rose to the status of the presidency of

Ghana? Since there are thousands of Kwami Nkrumah all over Ghana and

across the land of the Africa continent, how do we make them behave

exactly like Kwami Nkrumah will do as an ordianry person in the face

of the reality of Ghana and the AU?

Osagyfor Dr. Kwami Nkrumah lived and prove himself as a democrat whio

will frist exhust all possible means of democratic apprach in the

fight for justice before the last option of effecting a change by

force. If this is the great vertue of Kwami Nkrumah that is worthy of

emulation in the face of problem solving, can we convinced ourself

that we have in deed employed this principle in the AU for the

election of the president of the union, as we are doing in Ghana?

Nkrumah strongly believe in the right of the people to choose their

leadership figure which he made very clear in his day in Cornakry,

Guinea by constantly appealling to the people to decide the course of

their destiny. In Nkrumah's fervent appeal in the hard days in Guines,

the emphasis was for the people of Ghana to fight colletively for a

change of leadership of the entity of Ghana and not like individual

terririst Talaban. If we also believe in this course and here we are

faced with a reality of loosing a clear battle of life and the AU as

recommended by Kwami Nkrumah is clearly the only viable option before

us, have we then appealled to the people to embark on the agitation of

demanding for the right of participation in the election of the

president of the AU authrotiy? Are we even appreciating the

significance of organized approach to the Ghanians citizen's AU

demands?

When the Americans in their early days of their nationhood undertood

the complication of their people, they embarked in the definition of

the term Democracy. By defining democracy as "the government of the

people, by the people and for the people", is the AU in which only the

53 leaders of the AU member states voting on behalf of the 850 million

citizens of their various member states be considered to be democratic

enough? If this is what the Americans did to over come their problems

that made them evoled a unifying power that allowed them to be

powerful enough to turn their rights into wrong and their wrongs into

rights, what is then stoping us from doing the same? If it is now very

clear that we are now the victim of the universal injustce in which

our quest for justice is easily over turned with others injustice from

outside Africa onto our land, what choice have we than to mobilize our

people to make this unconditional demand?

If as a president of Ghana or not, Kwami Nkrumah will be dying for

this just course that will allow us to have one person on the land of

Africa as the president of the AU in accordance the driect choice of

the people through the ballot box democratically, what is holding

anyone of us from doing the same? Why must we want to fight only for

CPP to get into the seat of government of Ghana before we will have to

do what we have to do? What then do we do when CPP finally get into

government and then we have Kossmos, Forb News, CIA, KGB, MI5, and the

almight tinny lobbist of Warshington holding us all into ransom? How

do we explain the concerns that Kosmos is being enthrone as sovereign

entity over the government and people of Ghana to our children? Is

this a food for thought or just another old stroy to be swept under

the carpet just as we did with the painful lost of over 120 Ghanaina

youth in the gold pit? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rDCEYT6i_-g

Kofi Ali Abdul

(wakoyako or Ali Abdul yekin)

Columnist: Abdul, Kofi Ali