7

Read Comments Comments (7)

• KA NA WU 12 years ago

  If you cannot put across facts to the reading public, why fabricate lies to deceive us? By what authority are you presenting such nonsense? Who has hired you to throw this on the web? If you have nothing to write, don't do ...
  read full comment

  If you cannot put across facts to the reading public, why fabricate lies to deceive us? By what authority are you presenting such nonsense? Who has hired you to throw this on the web? If you have nothing to write, don't do it here. You are a rented NPP stooge. Silly article. Readers should discard this trash.

  reply
• joseph Antwi 11 years ago

  most stupid article. no facts. can you rule over a house or even a village. you failed in your BA degree that is why you shifted to accounting. you don't have the analytical brains to discuss Nkrumah. the man of the millenniu ...
  read full comment

  most stupid article. no facts. can you rule over a house or even a village. you failed in your BA degree that is why you shifted to accounting. you don't have the analytical brains to discuss Nkrumah. the man of the millennium the one who gave Africa its own identity and pride

  reply
• emmanuel osei kofi 12 years ago

  not helpful
  post his achievement in education, politics, transportation,communication etc

  not helpful
  post his achievement in education, politics, transportation,communication etc

  reply
• PAUL GYANG 11 years ago

  NKRUMAH NEVER DIES HIS 8 YEARS OF GOVERNANCE CANNOT BE MARCHED WITH THE TOTAL NUMER OF YEARS BY HIS SUCCUSSORS

  NKRUMAH NEVER DIES HIS 8 YEARS OF GOVERNANCE CANNOT BE MARCHED WITH THE TOTAL NUMER OF YEARS BY HIS SUCCUSSORS

  reply
• tettey ocloo (economic historian) 11 years ago

  A critical analysis of the work shows that the writer wasn't objective. There is too much subjective in the work and does not qualify to be on this page. The work also lacks dating, which is very important in every historic w ...
  read full comment

  A critical analysis of the work shows that the writer wasn't objective. There is too much subjective in the work and does not qualify to be on this page. The work also lacks dating, which is very important in every historic work.

  reply
• Francis Ludwig 11 years ago

  This article is a bad one.In fact it is not at all factual and this doctor should come again.Dr Nkrumah's detractors cannot tell us how much was left in the kitty by the british.
  I can bet that,fair minded and well read ghan ...
  read full comment

  This article is a bad one.In fact it is not at all factual and this doctor should come again.Dr Nkrumah's detractors cannot tell us how much was left in the kitty by the british.
  I can bet that,fair minded and well read ghanaians are very grateful God Made him first president, like Moses in the bible to liberate the Isralites. Anything short of this would have spelt disaster for the country. They sold Vodafone and doused the cedi instead of finding a good strategy to improve agriculture and consequently manufacturing.A certain prez. took 2 yrs. salary advance and leave and proceeded abroad to lecture without putting a minute of work in. Where was this doctor/author. This can best be described as the effusions of a disgruntled sycophant seeking to better the lot of his non-excellent masters and ghanaians must be wary of such people and the atrocities they are capable of. They have nothing new to offer.
  Long live the legacy of Nkrumah Long live Ghana.

  reply
• Francis Ludwig 11 years ago

  This guy is a pervert. His article is more than porn.

  This guy is a pervert. His article is more than porn.

  reply