8

Read Comments Comments (8)

• Kofi Acquah 1 week ago

  I call this warped legal, logical reasoning.

  I call this warped legal, logical reasoning.

  reply
• The Motherland 1 week ago

  The rendering of your name suggests that you are a lawyer. If that is so, then you have succeeded in adding to the puzzle as to what sort of material lawyers are made of. Throughout your article you have spent your energy huf ...
  read full comment

  The rendering of your name suggests that you are a lawyer. If that is so, then you have succeeded in adding to the puzzle as to what sort of material lawyers are made of. Throughout your article you have spent your energy huffing and puffing about all that is not the crux of the matter. For example, you adduce reasons to underscore the fact that the Special Prosecutor has prosecutorial discretion. But nowhere has anyone said that he hasn’t got such discretion. Rather, the central issue at the heart of the debate relates to documentary evidence attesting to the prosecutorial powers of the Special Prosecutor. That’s all. You only needed to provide substantiation for this element, to nail the matter, rather than the tangent you went, ending in much ado about nothing!! Are you sure you are a lawyer? Perhaps not a very learned one.

  reply
• Sam 1 week ago

  This is Ghana, a country of Numbtists. Every goddam this is an issue. Almost every law is badly written, so much so that there are various interpretations. Nothing is straightforward- yet we expect to develop? When it is goin ...
  read full comment

  This is Ghana, a country of Numbtists. Every goddam this is an issue. Almost every law is badly written, so much so that there are various interpretations. Nothing is straightforward- yet we expect to develop? When it is going, it is rather coming. dumb dumb dumb

  reply
• Emmanuel Bright Attuah 1 week ago

  Smartest of legal minds! Bravo

  Smartest of legal minds! Bravo

  reply
• NDC-NPP 1 week ago

  VERY IMPRESSIVE ARTICLE ON THE MATTER OF THE PROSECUTORIAL POWERS OF THE OSP! HOPE THE SUPREME COURT, IN ITS DELIBERATION OF THE CASE, TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION THE POINTS RAISED ABOVE.
  IN MY CANDID OPINION, THE BEST WAY TO D ...
  read full comment

  VERY IMPRESSIVE ARTICLE ON THE MATTER OF THE PROSECUTORIAL POWERS OF THE OSP! HOPE THE SUPREME COURT, IN ITS DELIBERATION OF THE CASE, TAKE INTO CONSIDERATION THE POINTS RAISED ABOVE.
  IN MY CANDID OPINION, THE BEST WAY TO DEAL WITH OR SATISFY ARTICLE 88(4) OF THE 1992 CONSTITUTION AND SECTION 4(2) OF THE OSP ACT WAS TO GET THE ATTORNEY GENERAL TO SWEAR IN THE SPECIAL PROSECUTOR AND CONFIRMING THE AUTHORITY TO PROSECUTE UNTO HIM OR HER.

  reply
• Northern Boy 1 week ago

  Great piece. I know president mahama wil not allow any person or group of persons to frustrate this office. We know zhat the president means well for ghana and therefore will protect this noble office by even strengthening i ...
  read full comment

  Great piece. I know president mahama wil not allow any person or group of persons to frustrate this office. We know zhat the president means well for ghana and therefore will protect this noble office by even strengthening it. Any attempt to weaken or abolish it has the huge potential of bringing down the ndc government.

  reply
• Mensah 1 week ago

  Are you sure u are dealing with the exact question taken to the supreme court for interpretation?
  By the way, thanks for ur opinion.

  Are you sure u are dealing with the exact question taken to the supreme court for interpretation?
  By the way, thanks for ur opinion.

  reply
• Tony 1 week ago

  Whoever authorizes you has responsibility for your actions. Therefore that person has the right to take away that authority granted. Simple logic.

  Whoever authorizes you has responsibility for your actions. Therefore that person has the right to take away that authority granted. Simple logic.

  reply