How The Supreme Court Shall Decide NPP Case!

Read Article

Comments (56)

This article is closed for comments.

Read Comments Comments (56)

Mr. D 13 years ago

EXCELLENT ANALYSIS AND GOOD READING MATERIAL.

EXCELLENT ANALYSIS AND GOOD READING MATERIAL.
Tuf. Osei 13 years ago

That is, if you're thinking the NDC way. Your analysis is based on " if " Are you the SC to say how this case will be judged? You don't have to be a brainer to read through your wants and hows. Just keep your views with your ...
read full comment

That is, if you're thinking the NDC way. Your analysis is based on " if " Are you the SC to say how this case will be judged? You don't have to be a brainer to read through your wants and hows. Just keep your views with your conspirators and let the real judges do their work.
MR. FIGURE- OUT 13 years ago

All trokosis think alike and you can imagine if the supreme court is filled with the likes of Kpakpo with seemingly trokosi genes in his blood. The Supreme Court should throw the NPP case out because the NDC has won the majo ...
read full comment

All trokosis think alike and you can imagine if the supreme court is filled with the likes of Kpakpo with seemingly trokosi genes in his blood. The Supreme Court should throw the NPP case out because the NDC has won the majority seat in parliament. What A F***! And that Ghana should loose more money if rerun of the election is to be occasioned! So, therefore, the SC must reject the petition. I suspect Kpakpo is a a Ga man, but he definitely has some trokosi trait in his gene. Hence this foolish reasoning.
Kojo T 13 years ago

Kpakpo , you are welcome as a " trokosi" Ewe. It means you THINK and not like sheep

Kpakpo , you are welcome as a " trokosi" Ewe. It means you THINK and not like sheep
Oba Nyansani Baako Pe In Ghana! 13 years ago

The spirit of God has spoken to me directly that NDC will surely lose the Supreme court case.

Mahama himself knew that he did not win the 2012 General Elections. We are waiting for the Judges. God bless Ghana.

The spirit of God has spoken to me directly that NDC will surely lose the Supreme court case.

Mahama himself knew that he did not win the 2012 General Elections. We are waiting for the Judges. God bless Ghana.
TerriblY Spe cifiC 13 years ago

Does this fool know that the NPP is challenging the results of 38 Parliamentary results? And does he know that "results" such as the one successfuly challenged by Adwoa Sarfo at Dome Kwabenya was also "counted and declared in ...
read full comment

Does this fool know that the NPP is challenging the results of 38 Parliamentary results? And does he know that "results" such as the one successfuly challenged by Adwoa Sarfo at Dome Kwabenya was also "counted and declared in front of all the candidates?"
Afi 13 years ago

Excellent analysis my foot, who does he think he is to tell the sc how to rule on this matter, from his shallow analysis, anybody can tell where he is coming from. Pls dont think for the sc, they know what to do.

Excellent analysis my foot, who does he think he is to tell the sc how to rule on this matter, from his shallow analysis, anybody can tell where he is coming from. Pls dont think for the sc, they know what to do.
oliver 12 years ago

Where were NPP when they were counting the result at the colination center' are they tell us the were asleep?

Where were NPP when they were counting the result at the colination center' are they tell us the were asleep?
Kojo 13 years ago

Haba!

Haba!
Concerned Citizen 13 years ago

Absolute rubbish! Why should the court evaluate if declaring Nana Akuffo-Addo the winner would or would not disturb the peace of Ghana when satisfied with the credibility of NPP's evidence? What disturbance do you have in min ...
read full comment

Absolute rubbish! Why should the court evaluate if declaring Nana Akuffo-Addo the winner would or would not disturb the peace of Ghana when satisfied with the credibility of NPP's evidence? What disturbance do you have in mind? Are you thinking only about the NDC rogues going on rampage? Nonsense! What about those that voted NPP and still feel cheated?

CONCERNED CITIZEN 13 years ago

PLS LET'S WAIT FOR THE SUPREME COURT.PERIOD.

PLS LET'S WAIT FOR THE SUPREME COURT.PERIOD.
Eng 13 years ago

What a trash!! Completely, rubbish stuff. Just make your mind up.

This is a clear case of a mind of a dishonest "intellectual" who has suddenly come to the realization that the NPP plaintiffs have got solid evidence befor ...
read full comment

What a trash!! Completely, rubbish stuff. Just make your mind up.

This is a clear case of a mind of a dishonest "intellectual" who has suddenly come to the realization that the NPP plaintiffs have got solid evidence before the Supreme Court and is now afraid that the NDC president is likely to lose hence your warped, twisted analysis.

Do you really think the NPP gurus will go to the Supreme Court to seek redress without having any solid evidence? You must be joking!!

Just leave the Supreme Court alone!! The members will know what to do better with a piece of solid evidence before them. I hate you wolves in democratic sheep clothing!!!
BOY KOFI 13 years ago

To begin with,NPP has made it clear that they have no confidence in the EC and will not accept the results if Nana Addo loses.They have made many public statements against the EC,accuse him for helping the NDC to win prior to ...
read full comment

To begin with,NPP has made it clear that they have no confidence in the EC and will not accept the results if Nana Addo loses.They have made many public statements against the EC,accuse him for helping the NDC to win prior to the elections.Nana Addo himself tried to put injunction on the 2008 elections,they announced the results themselves before the EC and they also attempted to stop the EC from declaring the winner of the 2012 Presidential Elections.All these elements amount to a planned strategy to discredit the elections and the EC.The very fact that their actions are premeditated alone could be the end of their petition,no matter the number of evidence.Thank you.
Freddy 13 years ago

Kpakpo should think next time !!

Kpakpo should think next time !!
BANKAS 13 years ago

you are not fair in your judgement,analysis is one sided .No emotions can push the courts ,FACTS IS THE CURRENCY IN THE LAW COURTS.

you are not fair in your judgement,analysis is one sided .No emotions can push the courts ,FACTS IS THE CURRENCY IN THE LAW COURTS.
MAHAMA THE THIEF 13 years ago

See who is trying to be moral in his analysis.THE TRUTH IS THE NDC STINKS TO THE HIGH HEAVENS.

See who is trying to be moral in his analysis.THE TRUTH IS THE NDC STINKS TO THE HIGH HEAVENS.
princewilly@ymail.com 13 years ago

A husband and his wife who have been married 20 years were doing some yard work. The man was working hard cleaning the BBQ grill while his wife was bending over, weeding flowers from the flower bed. So the man says to his wif ...
read full comment

A husband and his wife who have been married 20 years were doing some yard work. The man was working hard cleaning the BBQ grill while his wife was bending over, weeding flowers from the flower bed. So the man says to his wife "Your rear ass is almost as wide as this grill" She ignores the remark.

A little later, the husband takes his measuring tape and measures the grill, then he goes over to his wife while she is bending over, measures her ass end and gasps, "Geez, it really IS as wide as the grill!" She ignores this remark as well.

Later that night while in bed, her husband starts to feel frisky. The wife calmly responds, "If you think I'm gonna fire up the grill for one little Sausage, you are sadly mistaken.
norvisi 13 years ago

I think this is a good analysis but the record must be set right so that the subsequent elections are without any doubt ,we are tired of all these every election year.

I think this is a good analysis but the record must be set right so that the subsequent elections are without any doubt ,we are tired of all these every election year.
EMMA 13 years ago

THE AUTHOR IS TOTALLY CONFUSED AND IS MERELY INDULGING IN WISHFUL THINKING. TOTAL TRASH!!!

THE AUTHOR IS TOTALLY CONFUSED AND IS MERELY INDULGING IN WISHFUL THINKING. TOTAL TRASH!!!
Kwame 13 years ago

Excellent Analysis!

Excellent Analysis!

Freddy 13 years ago

This is an unintelligent & biased analysis. The analysis shows that the NDC will lose the LEGAL CASE but will win because of international observers' verdict, their parliamentary majority & for the sake of peace and stabilit ...
read full comment

This is an unintelligent & biased analysis. The analysis shows that the NDC will lose the LEGAL CASE but will win because of international observers' verdict, their parliamentary majority & for the sake of peace and stability of the country. Poor Kpakpo Allotey. COME AGAIN !!
Kofi Ata, Cambridge, UK 13 years ago

Mr Allotey, good effort on analysis but wrong interpretations and applications. You should remember that for justice to be served and to be seen to be done, the SC Justices must balance the peace and security of the state wit ...
read full comment

Mr Allotey, good effort on analysis but wrong interpretations and applications. You should remember that for justice to be served and to be seen to be done, the SC Justices must balance the peace and security of the state with the rights of the petitioners for justice. The Justices will not simply ignore wrong doing and conclude the status quo must remain for the sake of peace and security of the state because that in itself will threaten the peace and security that they want to preserve. That would be perverse.

You also misapplied the principle of "harmless error". That is not a blanket licence for acts that are unlawful and unconstitutional, as I understand it from my experience as a former Employment Tribunal Panel Member here in the UK. For example, in claims of unfair dismissal, after the panel has reached a decision that the Applicant was unfairly dismissed by the Respondent, it is our duty to apply the principle of "harmless error" before our final judgement.

The test is that, what would have been the final outcome, had the Respondent followed due process in terminating the contract of employment? In answering this question, a lot of consideration is given to facts of the case. Such as, what exactly led to the dismissal and the behaviour of the dismissed worker. Did his/her actions and omissions contributed to the dismissal, etc? Was the employer's behaviour in using wrong and unfair means to dismiss the worker so irrational that no rational employer would have behaved that way in similar circumstances, etc.

It is only after these issues have been addressed to our satisfaction that the final decision is made, bearing in mind that our duty is, first and foremost to dispense justice to both parties.

I totally do not share your view that the SC Justices will make their decisions solely on what the international community consider to be right or wrong but most important, on the facts of the petition. The article was one sided and it's not surprising the responses.
Osei 13 years ago

the author is just writing something to wet his appetite. Greedy bastard.

the author is just writing something to wet his appetite. Greedy bastard.
Kojo 13 years ago

The arrogance of the NPP and its supporters can be easily seen from the way they convey their comments on any issue. If you in the NPP think you are superiour to all Ghanaians then go and form your own country and display you ...
read full comment

The arrogance of the NPP and its supporters can be easily seen from the way they convey their comments on any issue. If you in the NPP think you are superiour to all Ghanaians then go and form your own country and display your baselessly over inflated egos. Does anybody in his right mind have to heap insults on an intelligent analysis of the courts options. For people who claim such high intellectual prowess one wonders whether you actually attained your so called academic laurels through your own hard work.
NANAOWUSUNYANSA, GERMANY 13 years ago

VERY SAD ! WHICH FOREIGN COUNTRIES KNOW GHANA SUPREME COURT JUSTICES ARE BIAS TOWARDS THE NPP ? SO NOW GHANA SHOULD TAKE WHAT EVER THE FOREIGN NATIONS SAY ? CAN GHANAIANS SAY SAME ABOUT US ELECTIONS ? WHAT HAPPENED IN 2000 IN ...
read full comment

VERY SAD ! WHICH FOREIGN COUNTRIES KNOW GHANA SUPREME COURT JUSTICES ARE BIAS TOWARDS THE NPP ? SO NOW GHANA SHOULD TAKE WHAT EVER THE FOREIGN NATIONS SAY ? CAN GHANAIANS SAY SAME ABOUT US ELECTIONS ? WHAT HAPPENED IN 2000 IN US AL GORE VRS. BUSH ? WHY CAN´T SOME GHANAIAN INTELECTUALS USE COMMON SENSE AND ALWAYS SPEAK OUT WITH LOGIC? ASK KWESI PRATT IF HE AGREE TO WHAT THE AMERICANS OR EUROPEANS SAY ABOUT GHANA POLITICS ? WHY NOW ?
OTCHERE DARKO 13 years ago

I can see that this is the case.

You are INFACT directing the Supreme Court.

Fortunately, you are just a cuckoo singing in your lonely nest.

The Supreme Court is made up of men and women who see [and must see] iss ...
read full comment

I can see that this is the case.

You are INFACT directing the Supreme Court.

Fortunately, you are just a cuckoo singing in your lonely nest.

The Supreme Court is made up of men and women who see [and must see] issues from a on-partisan angle. We are grateful to God for this.

It would be helpful, though, if the Supreme Court could be left alone to decide; and, HOPEFULLY, NDC and NPP members and supporters will accept the court ruling when it comes finally.
MAMBORA 13 years ago

Are u serious at all? oh well, if your mother is drowning in river and u think she is swimming is your own case. Law is not a matter of fact but presentation my brother.

Are u serious at all? oh well, if your mother is drowning in river and u think she is swimming is your own case. Law is not a matter of fact but presentation my brother.
fo kofi 13 years ago

ALL SHOWS THAT YOU DO NOT WANT A TRUTHFUL CHANGE B'COS IT WILL CREAT INSTABILITY EVEN THOUGH NDC LOST OR STOLE THE VERDICT! THIS IS UNHEALTHY. NPP ABD UNBIASED GHAANIANS HAS WAITED PATIENTLY FOR THE TRUTH. WHICHEVER WAY IT G ...
read full comment

ALL SHOWS THAT YOU DO NOT WANT A TRUTHFUL CHANGE B'COS IT WILL CREAT INSTABILITY EVEN THOUGH NDC LOST OR STOLE THE VERDICT! THIS IS UNHEALTHY. NPP ABD UNBIASED GHAANIANS HAS WAITED PATIENTLY FOR THE TRUTH. WHICHEVER WAY IT GOES DOES NOT MATTER ONCE IT IS THE TRUTH!
Freddy 13 years ago

THE NDC are not thinking of the SOLID EVIDENCE provided by the NPP. Their main defence is now based on parliamentary elections, international observers and the peace and stability of the country. Very unfortunate. This is a d ...
read full comment

THE NDC are not thinking of the SOLID EVIDENCE provided by the NPP. Their main defence is now based on parliamentary elections, international observers and the peace and stability of the country. Very unfortunate. This is a defeatist attitude on the part of the NDC. They have lost the legal battle already !!
BOY KOFI 13 years ago

Judges don't care about strong evidence they go into logic conclusion of credibility.We all followed the elections on radio,tv and internet,the results were presented live so don't let nobody fools you.Anybody can fabricate e ...
read full comment

Judges don't care about strong evidence they go into logic conclusion of credibility.We all followed the elections on radio,tv and internet,the results were presented live so don't let nobody fools you.Anybody can fabricate evidence and present it in court but the judges will investigate the case profoundly.Even when the evidence is credible they will still go ahead to find out if the actions were premeditated or not.Unless you tell me now that you don't trust the Supreme Court,just wait and see.Thank you.

CONCERNED CITIZEN 13 years ago

All your analysis show`s clearly you are NDC.It`s like you thinking for the SUPREME COURT,this is totaly rubbish layman`s ideas an idiotic NDC mindset.

All your analysis show`s clearly you are NDC.It`s like you thinking for the SUPREME COURT,this is totaly rubbish layman`s ideas an idiotic NDC mindset.
BOY KOFI 13 years ago

You lack critical thinking my friend,who told you that I am NDC fan?You got it all wrong,if you have gone to Supreme Court,please wait for judgement and stop speculations,it's enough.I am simply not happy about the way NPP is ...
read full comment

You lack critical thinking my friend,who told you that I am NDC fan?You got it all wrong,if you have gone to Supreme Court,please wait for judgement and stop speculations,it's enough.I am simply not happy about the way NPP is fooling its supporters in believing that Nana Addo won the elections therefore the court will overturn the declaration of the Electoral Commission.Please refrain from insults,that is what made NPP lost the elections.Thank you.
Freddy 13 years ago

The Supreme Court is not a Palace Court !!

The Supreme Court is not a Palace Court !!
nana addo 13 years ago

If the npp has a strong evidence,they would not be bothered who precides at the sc.so u writer big up.law and politics are seperate.

If the npp has a strong evidence,they would not be bothered who precides at the sc.so u writer big up.law and politics are seperate.
Chief amankwa 13 years ago

Kpapko what u expect from a man like this

Kpapko what u expect from a man like this
Liar Liar Pants on Fire 13 years ago

Henry Kpakpo Allotey where thou from?

After reading your views on this matter, and it is only your views, I have concluded that your are biased and have found your views distasteful.

It would be better kept to yourself.

Henry Kpakpo Allotey where thou from?

After reading your views on this matter, and it is only your views, I have concluded that your are biased and have found your views distasteful.

It would be better kept to yourself.
Oppong Kyekyeku 13 years ago

The Judges will be wasting taxpayers' money if this is how they judge a case!

The Judges will be wasting taxpayers' money if this is how they judge a case!
Oppong Kyekyeku 13 years ago

Then the palace would better decide on this case where this reasoning can better prevail!

Then the palace would better decide on this case where this reasoning can better prevail!
asamoah kwaku 13 years ago

ghana is not for the npp we dont need them becouse we have trai the 8yrs and nothing better came out we are overhear them laiyers only god will deal with you.

ghana is not for the npp we dont need them becouse we have trai the 8yrs and nothing better came out we are overhear them laiyers only god will deal with you.
Adongo 13 years ago

Allotey: Charity begins at home!
Stop your cheap Gas from selling your lands and heritage to these jungle "all-die-be-die" tribal folks, for balls of kenkey! See how your language and the once proud Ga nation is going EXTINC ...
read full comment

Allotey: Charity begins at home!
Stop your cheap Gas from selling your lands and heritage to these jungle "all-die-be-die" tribal folks, for balls of kenkey! See how your language and the once proud Ga nation is going EXTINCT??That's what you should be doing!

Adongo
John 13 years ago

How in earth can anyone expect the SC to declare Akufo Addo the winner after he lost? The EC declared Mahma the winner. Except the NPP for selfish reasons, everyone else agrees with the EC. Good luck Narcotic Peddlers Party f ...
read full comment

How in earth can anyone expect the SC to declare Akufo Addo the winner after he lost? The EC declared Mahma the winner. Except the NPP for selfish reasons, everyone else agrees with the EC. Good luck Narcotic Peddlers Party folks. Keep wasting your time. NDC already has a candidate for 2016. Think about that!!!
AGYA YAW 13 years ago

JUST SHUTUP U ARE NOT A JUDGE SO PLEASE STAY AWAY FROM THIS CASE IF U HAVE BEEN BRIBE BY THE NDC THEN SEE URSELF AS A FAILURE WHY NOT SHUT UR STINKING MOUTH FOR THE COURT TO RULE THE CASE MOTHER FUCKER

JUST SHUTUP U ARE NOT A JUDGE SO PLEASE STAY AWAY FROM THIS CASE IF U HAVE BEEN BRIBE BY THE NDC THEN SEE URSELF AS A FAILURE WHY NOT SHUT UR STINKING MOUTH FOR THE COURT TO RULE THE CASE MOTHER FUCKER
Coler Mc 13 years ago

What a vegetable piece of article. Henry shito, you write as if you are a lawyer, but I think you set out to dilute the NPP's case. Unfortunately you only succeeded in exposing your little mind. Whoever tasked you with writin ...
read full comment

What a vegetable piece of article. Henry shito, you write as if you are a lawyer, but I think you set out to dilute the NPP's case. Unfortunately you only succeeded in exposing your little mind. Whoever tasked you with writing this article, I am sorry for him/her.
Mi6 13 years ago

Assuming that the Supreme Court must do this and that.Are you not very Stupid in your assumption?

Assuming that the Supreme Court must do this and that.Are you not very Stupid in your assumption?
Tom 13 years ago

useless article

useless article
Mugu 13 years ago

Thank u brilliant Kpakpo.

Thank u brilliant Kpakpo.
CROSS 13 years ago

Wishful thinking and biased even though i find you intelligent. These days intellectuals have become partisan in their deliberation so you are forgiven. Let us concentrate on punishing severely deceitful and criminals in elec ...
read full comment

Wishful thinking and biased even though i find you intelligent. These days intellectuals have become partisan in their deliberation so you are forgiven. Let us concentrate on punishing severely deceitful and criminals in electoral fraud so it does not become profitable to attempt to try. That is what this is about and not who becomes President. We want strong institutions to protect the Nation and not allow cheats if is proven in court to think they can take this nation for granted.Name, shame and humiliate under the law is the way forward so only decent and righteous people can walk in our streets.Any EC official caught in the net should not only rot in prison but humiliated so badly that he can commit suicide to serve as a deterrent.Countries break up because of greedy few.
JOEDUSU@yahoo.com 13 years ago

EC MUST PUBLISH THE RESULTS POLLING STATION BY POLLING STATION. IT ONLY TAKES ONE EXCELL SHEET TO DO THAT. THEN THE GENERAL POPULACE WHO WITHNESSED THE COUNTING ACROSS THE COINTY CAN SEE FOR THEMSELVES IF THE RESULTS THE HEAR ...
read full comment

EC MUST PUBLISH THE RESULTS POLLING STATION BY POLLING STATION. IT ONLY TAKES ONE EXCELL SHEET TO DO THAT. THEN THE GENERAL POPULACE WHO WITHNESSED THE COUNTING ACROSS THE COINTY CAN SEE FOR THEMSELVES IF THE RESULTS THE HEARD AT THE POLLING STATION IS WHAT WAS EVENTUALLY RECEIVED AT EC HQ. SMIPLE
JOEDUSU@yahoo.com 13 years ago

i was hoping for an intellectual analysis not an openly biased synopsis
disappointing for neutrals
acceptable only for ndc followers
and i guess in equal measure nauseating for npp following...
Score 2/10

i was hoping for an intellectual analysis not an openly biased synopsis
disappointing for neutrals
acceptable only for ndc followers
and i guess in equal measure nauseating for npp following...
Score 2/10
Panin Kwaapia 13 years ago

The NPP is alrady blaming the Supreme Court so that when they loose, they will tell Ghanaians that "we told you so" They are a useless bunch of people. I am not lieing to you.

The NPP is alrady blaming the Supreme Court so that when they loose, they will tell Ghanaians that "we told you so" They are a useless bunch of people. I am not lieing to you.
Alex 13 years ago

Your analysis is biased. It is skewed in favour of NDC. Leave the judgement to the Supreme Court.

Your analysis is biased. It is skewed in favour of NDC. Leave the judgement to the Supreme Court.
MENSAH 13 years ago

You clearly sound an NDC SUPPORTER.

You clearly sound an NDC SUPPORTER.
nii 13 years ago

Who are those international observers,
obasanjo didnt win any of the election he contested in life free and fair so how do believe somebody leading a group of crrupt people to look after our election. he will say is free and ...
read full comment

Who are those international observers,
obasanjo didnt win any of the election he contested in life free and fair so how do believe somebody leading a group of crrupt people to look after our election. he will say is free and fair because he did the same to stay in power.
SLICKBILLYWILLY 13 years ago

discussing the petition which is pendite-lite.

discussing the petition which is pendite-lite.
Seymour Gray, LL.B. (USA) 13 years ago

“HOW THE SUPREME COURT SHALL DECIDE NPP CASE!”
A Comment on the above article:
The author, Henry Kpakpo Allotey, evidences considerable bias and pre-judgments’ in his analysis of what he thinks the Supreme Court migh ...
read full comment

“HOW THE SUPREME COURT SHALL DECIDE NPP CASE!”
A Comment on the above article:
The author, Henry Kpakpo Allotey, evidences considerable bias and pre-judgments’ in his analysis of what he thinks the Supreme Court might “decide” in the above cited case. For this reason I will focus on my perceptions of the author’s biases. For example, in paragraph #2 the author speaks of credible errors or acts of malfeasants as events that the Supreme Court must rule upon, but he errors when he says that “the Court must take into account that the NDC also won the parliamentary results because…the NPP is not challenging the parliamentary results because they were declared right at the constituency collation centres before any results were transmitted to the EC (Electorate Commission) headquarters, when they were supposedly altered in favor of John Mahama and NDC.”
The author is wrong in the above statement because the leaders of the NPP have stated that there may well be additional filings from the petitioners.
In paragraph 3 the author states that if there is credible evidence of fraud the Supreme Court must be able to go further and determine what “incentive” the Supreme can identify as factual that constitutes the cause of and “for the whole of the EC (Electoral Commission) to connive” [and conspire to perpetrate the fraud] “with the NDC.”
To follow the author’s logic here would be like having a filming of which shows a man mortally shooting another person and demanding that a motivation for the intent to murder be proven before the film can be used as evidence.
The author goes on to state that if the Supreme Court finds that there has been errors or malfeasants that altered the election of Nana Akufo-Addo in favor of electing John Mahama then the Court must also determine if all of the Parliamentary elections fit the same criteria and if all of the Parliamentary elections do not fit the same criteria then that evidence of fraud in the presidential contest between Nana Akufo-Addo and John Mahama must be ignored.
The author goes on to state that even if errors and/or malfeasants is found to constitute fraud that altered the election of Nana Akufo-Addo and changed it to an election of John Mahama then that legal consequence can only be used if the Supreme Court can rule that Akufo-Addo is the winner of the election only if that decision will fit the “mood of Ghanaians in terms of maintaining, or disturbing the peace.” In addition in paragraph #7 the author goes on to allege that the Court could not rule that Akufo-Addo won the presidential election, even if John Mahama won by the EC’s decree due to fraud, if Ghana would not be governable, because the author has determined that the NDC has won control of Parliament without any element of fraud and therefore John Mahama must be the victor in the presidential contest, because the NDC could not have won the parliamentary election without John Mahama winning also the presidential election.
In paragraph 8 the author states that if “The figures could only push the two contending parties into a second round, the Court must take into account the monetary consequences and destabilization of the country in ordering for a run-off which is most likely to be won by John Mahama.” Notwithstanding the figures that have been submitted to the Court by the three leading members of the NPP would have Nana Addo Akufo-Addo winning the (50% + 1) vote share.
In paragraph 9 the author cites the “congratulatory messages” from other countries; saying that these congratulatory messages have made John Mahama the rightful president of Ghana.
In paragraph #10 the author cites as his final salvo that Ghana and the world perceives that “the judiciary is leaning towards NPP and the NPP could manipulate the courts anyhow to their advantage.” If this perception of the author were true the Ghana Supreme Court could not be a Supreme Court. Most of the world considers Ghana’s Supreme Court a truly Supreme Court and I believe the author is wrong again.
Ayibge Ni Aboa 12 years ago

This nigga is a fucking..Shit..ur moda wate..Ayigbe ni aboa

This nigga is a fucking..Shit..ur moda wate..Ayigbe ni aboa

56 Comments

Welcome,

SIGN IN

Welcome,

RESET PASSWORD

Hello,

Terms and conditions

REGISTER

How The Supreme Court Shall Decide NPP Case!

Read Comments .st0{display:none;fill:#14BDD3;} .st1{display:none;} .st2{display:inline;fill:#FC0F0F;} .st3{display:inline;fill:#FFFFFF;} .st4{display:inline;fill:none;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:6;stroke-miterlimit:10;} Comments (56)

Read Comments Comments (56)