Opinions

News

Sports

Business

Entertainment

GhanaWeb TV

Africa

Country

The human genome project and the claims of homosexual activists

Fri, 10 Jul 2015 Source: Seshie, Stanley

The homosexual activists are noted for seeking support in science and

human right movements for appealing to people to accept the

legalization of the act. We shall not be taken away by what science

and human right movements had achieved for mankind. But we must all be

interested in the verdict of science on homosexuality. And then, the

justification of subsuming it under the umbrella of human rights. So

let us focus on their claims.

IT IS GENETIC. REALLY?

They claim it is genetic. So they are born gay. But no, it is not. In

April, 2003, the world witnessed one of the highest achievements of

science...specifically in biology, which is the completion of the

Human Genome Project. The Human Genome Project is the mapping or

sequencing of all genes in mankind, carried out in the scientific

laboratories in all over the world. This means that human X and Y

chromosomes, the two sex chromosomes, had been completely sequenced.

As these unique chromosomes were analyzed for the construction of the

gene maps, using the sequence from the Human Genome Project, the much

anticipated gene.....the "gay gene" was never found due to its

nonexistence. In sum neither the X nor Y chromosomes contain any "gay

gene".

The homosexual activists via their mostly funded scientists kept

pouring in skewed interpretation of researches upon researches just to

shore up the claim of biological genetic origin. But, the overarching

reproducibility of science always defeats and exposes such reseachers

as their claimed results can hardly be found/reproduced anytime the

experiments were carried out elsewhere by other scientist in the same

field with the same sample size or more.

For instance when experiments of Kallmann leading to his famous 1952

sexual orientation studies, that was widely interpreted as nailing the

genetic basis of homosexuality, was repeated by Michael Bailey and

Richard Pillard, researchers at Northwestern University and the Boston

University of Medicine respectively, their findings were rather

different from the claim of Kallmann. These two researchers' examined

56 pairs of twins, 54 pairs of fraternal twins, 142 non-twin brothers,

and 57 pairs of adoptive brothers, and the results was totally

different.

This is because the hypothesis was simple and understandable; if

homosexuality is an inherited trait hence genetic, then more twin

brothers would be expected to have the same orientation than non-two

brothers or non-biological brothers. Instead of the results fitting

into the hypothesis, the result showed that nearly half of the

identical twins studied, one was homosexual and one is not. The result

simply meant one thing; homosexuality is not genetic. It is of

environmental origin. Because if there was a "gay gene" as claimed,

then all the identical twins should have reported a homosexual

orientation, because identical twin (or twins) share almost the same

genetic material.

Also it was found that "the biological and adoptive brothers showed

approximately the same rate in the studies". This suggest that there

is no genetic components but rather environmental component, else it

does not make sense that biological siblings should have the same rate

of sexual orientation as adoptive brothers. Just as it does not make

sense that within identical twins sharing almost the same genetic

materials, one should be homosexual and the other not. In fact there

are many studies out there proving the non-genetic origin of

homosexuality and establishing firmly its environmental origin.

EQUAL TREATMENT

They like to create and stay behind the impression of suppression,

oppression and repression in society against them, hence their demand

for equal rights of treatment as others. Yes, no matter how long it

will take, humanity must eventually purge themselves of such inhuman

treatments in order for all to live freely in conjunction with society

and societal rules. So there is that collective consciousness towards

creating a free society for all. But there is a contextual

understanding to the main reasons why equal rights to treatment is a

such a nerve-touching issue in Western nations, especially US. The USA

is a melting pot of different races where discrimination kept rearing

its ugly faces in different forms.

The dominant White races kept multreating other minorities such as the

Blacks, Hispanics, Asians etc, as if they are not part of the pot.

This is the basis of the equal right to treatment in the US, that, the

White dominant races treat the minorities equally in all spheres of

human endeavours and needs as in education, health, transport, housing

etc. And much had been achieved in this respect....thanks to the civil

right movements that spring up. Yet, despite all the strides made,

racial discrimination and segregation against minorities is still

alive in even today's 21st century US, if not the West. It is never

disappearing. It keeps coming back.

To this course of equal treatment, they are forever committed to

fighting for as long as it will take. There is no retreating, and in

this desperation mistakes are abound. It is this very psychological

scar of non-disappearance of discrimination against minorities in US

and Western nations, and their laudable commitment to bringing it

down, that the homosexual activists have exploited, probably

justifiably to their advantage, in presenting homsexuals in such

light.

In other words, homosexuals are shouting and crying they are the new

minorities in town, in need of protection desperately. So if

homosexuality is legalized in Western nations, especially US, it is

probaly influenced by the collective protection of the minorities due

to their history of discrimnations and segragations than any other

reason. The same thing can be said for Ireland, the apathied South

Africa among others that have suffered heavily from discriminations in

one form or another.

But, what of Ghana? Do we have any notable discrimination and

segregation as in race, tribal, religious among others. Sure, there

may be pockets of such instances, but certaintly they are not of

national scale with any reasonable threat to national security unlike

the case in the Western nations, like US in particular. So the claims

of homosexual activists in Ghana are anecdotal and importation of

other peoples troubles as representations of situations in Ghana. If

there is any reason why there are no known active civil right

movements in Ghana to claim discriminations and demand an end to it,

is simply because of the absence of the cause that necesaarily ignites

such movements.

And it won't make sense that, of all other compelling problems that

are bedevilling us as a nation, it is this nonexistent , but a rather

self-made discrimination against homosexuals that we want to defend by

pushing for its legalization. In actuality, there is no basis for

legalization of homosexuality. No one is discrimination against them.

They are invisible minorites holed up by their own attitudes, not

oppressed, suppressed and repressed by the majorities in the sense

minorities suffers in the Western nations. At least no Ghanaian is

denied access to education, health, transport, housing, employments

among others on basis of colour, religious, or whatever yet.

CONCLUSION

Homosexuality has no genetic origin given the Human Genome Project

sequencing. It is therefore environmental, hence cultural in origin.

Its acceptance and legalization mostly had all to do with the

historical discrimination and segregation background of such nations,

where the collective protection of the minorities in society became

the consciousness of the people.

Unfortunately this is now being exploited by homosexual activists by

presenting them as minorities suffering such fates, hence in need of

protection via legalization. It worked for them. But it must fail here

in Ghana. The reason is simple. Ghana does not have such a history of

national discrimination and segregation as USA, South Africa, Ireland.

Culturally, there is no loophole for homosexual activists to exploit

here like they did in such countries. There are better things for

which these human right activists should direct their attention to.

SESHIE, STANLEY

Email; seshiehanku@gmail.com

Whatsapp; 0508951323

Columnist: Seshie, Stanley