Why is China set to approve a new law promoting 'ethnic unity'?

For decades, the Chinese government has been accused of implementing repressive policies designed to subjugate ethnic minorities, forcing them to assimilate into the dominant Han culture.

Now, a new law set to be rubber-stamped through the country's annual parliamentary session later this week will solidify, expand, and even speed up this process, further threatening the rights of minority groups and their way of life, academics and human rights activists say.

The Chinese government, however, defends it as crucial for promoting "modernisation through greater unity" and calls it the law for "Promoting Ethnic Unity and Progress".

It lowers the status of other languages at the expense of Mandarin; encourages intermarriage between the dominant Han Chinese and other ethnicities by prohibiting moves to restrict this; requires parents to "educate and guide minors to love the Chinese Communist Party"; and, in a sweeping generalisation, prohibits any acts seen as damaging to "ethnic unity".

Xi Jinping has repeatedly called for the "Sinicisation of religion", requiring religious practices to conform with what the Communist Party deems to be Chinese culture and values - and experts see this law as an entrenchment of what had already become a core part of his rule.

"Whether it is the promotion of Mandarin or the restrictions on expression of ethnic minority identity, religious practices and so forth, the regime is saying that all that stuff we did is correct and, we are so confident in that, that we are going to now elevate what was previously just sort of policy to the level of basic law," Aaron Glasserman from the University of Pennsylvania says.

With populations ranging from tens of thousands to millions, there are 55 official ethnic minorities in China.

But Beijing has always worried more about some than others - it faces the gravest allegations of human rights violations in Xinjiang, home to Uyghurs and other Turkic minorities, as well as in Tibet.

The Communist Party has relied heavily on promoting fear of retribution to combat any example of dangerous talk of breaking away, rather than offering more autonomy to make minority groups happier to be part of China.

In the months leading up to the 2008 Olympic Games, Tibetan monks led an uprising in Lhasa against Beijing's rule. Like previous uprisings, this too was crushed - Beijing says 22 people died, but Tibetan groups in exile estimate it was around 200.

The next year, in the far west of the country, deadly clashes between Uyghurs and Han Chinese in Xinjiang's regional capital, Urumqi, led to nearly 200 deaths.

In 2013, a group of Uyghur separatists was killed while driving a car loaded with explosive material towards the gate overlooking Tiananmen Square, and in 2014, another group of Uyghurs attacked passersby at a train station in Yunnan Province.

Beijing would argue that its heavy-handed crackdowns on ethnic minorities have been justified by violent insurrections.

But UN and rights groups allege that more than a million Uyghur Muslims have been forcibly detained in camps. The Chinese government has called these locations centres for "re-education" and vocational training. Reports also say that Uyghur religious practices have been curtailed and mosques shut down.

In Tibet, monasteries, which were once centres of power, are heavily controlled. Everyone under 18 must now learn Mandarin in state-run schools, and cannot study Buddhist texts. This is a blow for a community where children used to enrol in monastery-run schools to train as monks.

In more recent years, upheavals have followed government restrictions on Mongolian language teaching in Inner Mongolia and officials ordering the demolition of Hui Muslim mosques in Ningxia in the north-west.

Faced with such potential destabilisation, the government may have felt it needed the new law to supersede existing legal protections for minority rights, according to analysts.

And it allows them to control critical regions that link China to its neighbours and key global trade routes.

In its analysis of the new law, the China Power Project quoted Communist China's founder Mao as saying: "We say China is a country vast in territory, rich in resources and large in population; as a matter of fact, it is the Han nationality whose population is large and the minority nationalities whose territory is vast and whose resources are rich".

It's true that although some minority ethnic groups, like the Uyghurs, number in millions, they are still dwarfed by the number of people recorded in the census as being Han, who make up more than 90% of Chinese citizens.

But when you look at the homelands of Tibetans, Uyghurs, and Mongolians, these massive areas are rich in mineral resources and important for agriculture, and they count for a significant proportion of the country's entire land mass.

Throughout history, these groups have had periods of independence from China. They live in vast border regions with exposure to foreign countries. They not only speak their own languages but also have their own distinct scripts for writing.

They have, at times, tried to protect their distinct cultures by resisting Beijing's control, even if they didn't succeed, and their exiled communities have been some of the harshest critics of the regime abroad.

And though the law in China can often be whatever the Party wants it to be, the new "ethnic unity" law makes it that much easier for officials to implement what has already been in the works – they now have a clearer set of orders from above.

For years, the Chinese Government has offered incentives for Han Chinese people to move to Tibet or Xinjiang, where critics say it has deliberately tried to outpopulate minority ethnic groups. As a result, the regional capitals of Lhasa and Urumqi have already seen a massive influx of Han culture.

In addition, Beijing has encouraged marrying across ethnic groups with financial incentives, especially between Uyghurs and Han Chinese, and has been accused of trying to absorb minority groups into the majority Han culture in this way. Now the new law is touching on this.

"They're not explicitly promoting inter-ethnic marriage in the law. What they're saying is no person or organisation is allowed to interfere with marital freedom on the basis of someone's religious or ethnic identity," Glasserman says.

He gives the example of a local official having to deal with religious opposition from an imam or a priest when a marriage is proposed between a Han Chinese man and a woman from a minority ethnic group.

"You can imagine this official; their number one priority is to have as few problems as possible so they can get promoted or, at least, not fired. This official might quietly massage the situation so that pressure is put on so that the marriage does not go through. This law is making it harder for that informal process to play out and making it more likely that people will not allow the imam or the priest or the parents to say you are not allowed to marry that person".

In the China of 2026, it is difficult to interview Uyghurs, Tibetans, or Mongolians still living in their traditional homelands about their impressions of this law because criticising any government policy could see them imprisoned if their comments were judged to promote "separatism".

However, groups overseas that advocate for them have raised the alarm.