Fella Makafui, Medikal appear separately before Nungua Stool 'without land papers'

Actress Fella Makafui appeared before the Nungua Stool on May 24, 2024, following a summons issued earlier this week to herself and her estranged musician husband, Samuel Adu Frimpong, alias Medikal.

The two were issued with separate summons by the Office of the Gborbu Wulomo-Shitse, representing the Gadangme State, with respect to their land documents which have recently circulated on social media.

In photos shared online, Fella was seen in the company of fellow actress Habiba Sinare and other aides after the said meeting.

Journalist Caleb Nii Boye, shared details of the meeting in a Facebook post: "Fruitful meeting it was. Fella Makafui came but without the land documents. Medikal couldn’t make it but called to inform the chiefs.

"They have been asked to come back on Tuesday with the land documents," he captioned the post accompanied by a photo of Fella and the Nungua chiefs.

In an update on his earlier claim that Medikal did not attend the meeting, Nii Boye posted details of the musician's meeting with the chiefs later on Friday.

"Aftermath of the Medikal meeting with Nungua Traditional council. Medikal didn’t come to the meeting with the documents requested for, so he has been asked to return on Tuesday 11am with the said document," he stated.

This development unfolds amidst the divorce proceedings between the couple.

Once hailed as one of Ghana's most glamorous pairs, Fella Makafui and Medikal are navigating a turbulent separation while still residing together and co-parenting their daughter, Island Frimpong.

However, their living arrangement has sparked further disputes, with Medikal allegedly requesting Fella to remove her cousin from their shared residence.

Fella, on the other hand, has sought the intervention of the Criminal Investigations Department (CID) to probe Medikal, intensifying their ongoing conflict.

Also, the ownership of their residence has become a focal point of contention.

Medikal claims sole financial responsibility for the property but asserts he included Fella's name for their daughter's benefit.

Fella contests this, citing her contributions during their marriage and vows to substantiate her position in court.

Given the conflicting narratives, authorities have deemed it imperative to conduct a thorough investigation into the matter.



SARA