The Third-Term Debate: Performance, power, and Ghana’s democratic future

John Dramani Mahama has undeniably demonstrated experience, political maturity, and a renewed sense of purpose in governance. Many Ghanaians observe that his current leadership reflects clearer direction, institutional sobriety, and a deeper grasp of Ghana’s long-standing structural challenges than in the past. That acknowledgment is fair and widely shared.

However, the growing public discussion about the possibility of a third term raises questions that go far beyond the performance of one individual. At its core, this debate touches the very foundation of Ghana’s democratic stability and constitutional order.

Ghanaian politicians don’t understand democratic governance - CenPOA

Why a Third Term Is Risky for Ghana’s Long-Term Development:

1. Constitutional Integrity Matters More Than Personal Ability

Ghana’s two-term limit is one of the strongest democratic guardrails protecting the republic from executive overreach. Altering this provision—regardless of good intentions—creates a precedent that future leaders may exploit with far less restraint. Constitutions are designed precisely to restrain power, not to be adjusted to suit moments of political convenience.

2. Institutions Must Outlive Individuals

Sustainable national development does not come from exceptional leaders staying longer in office. It comes from strong institutions that function effectively regardless of who occupies the presidency. History shows that countries which anchor progress in personalities rather than institutions often struggle once those personalities leave the scene.

3. Africa’s Painful Lessons Are Clear

Across the African continent, third-term projects have repeatedly weakened democratic norms, polarised societies, and shifted national focus from governance to political survival. Ghana has proudly distinguished itself by resisting this trend. Preserving that record matters—not just symbolically, but practically.

4. Leadership Renewal Is a Democratic Strength, Not a Weakness

A healthy democracy prepares successors. If a nation comes to believe that only one individual can “fix” its problems, that belief itself signals a deeper institutional weakness—one that must be corrected, not prolonged through extended rule.

A Better Path Forward: Constructive Alternatives

Let Mahama’s legacy be institutional, not personal

Rather than extending tenure, lasting impact can be achieved by embedding reforms so deeply—economic governance, public sector discipline, decentralisation, youth inclusion—that they become irreversible regardless of future administrations.

Mentor and elevate a new generation of leaders

True statesmanship is measured not by how long one stays in power, but by the calibre of leaders one prepares to continue the national project.

Strengthen national development frameworks beyond electoral cycles

Ghana needs binding long-term national compacts that survive party changes. Constitutional amendments to extend individual leadership are a weak substitute for durable, inclusive development frameworks.

Opening the Discussion: Questions for Ghanaians

This debate deserves thoughtful national reflection. Some questions worth considering include:

• Should strong performance justify altering constitutional term limits?

• Is Ghana’s development best secured by leadership continuity or democratic renewal?

• What lessons—positive or negative—should Ghana draw from third-term debates elsewhere in Africa?

• How can Ghana ensure continuity of good policies without weakening constitutional safeguards?

• What responsibility do current leaders have to strengthen institutions rather than extend personal authority?

Bottom Line

Even if President Mahama is performing well—and many agree that he is—a third term is not in Ghana’s long-term interest. Ghana’s greatest asset is not any single leader, but its constitutional discipline, peaceful transfers of power, and democratic credibility.

Protecting these principles is itself a form of national development.

What do you think? Should Ghana maintain its two-term limit, or reconsider it in the name of continuity? The discussion is open.

Meanwhile, watch the 2025 GhanaWeb Excellence Awards Nominees Unveiling below: