The farces of Alban Bagbin are becoming emetic and putrid

Read Article

Comments (15)

This article is closed for comments.

Read Comments Comments (15)

Lance 1 year ago

What misrepresentation of the law. The supreme court rather is the one undermining the constitutional order. The supreme court is shamelessly throwing the constitutional order to the dogs. The supreme court has no jurisdictio ...
read full comment

What misrepresentation of the law. The supreme court rather is the one undermining the constitutional order. The supreme court is shamelessly throwing the constitutional order to the dogs. The supreme court has no jurisdiction on the matter in parliament.
gh.citizen 1 year ago

More than the Unanimous SC?

More than the Unanimous SC?
Wakasa 1 year ago

These profs and gyimie paaa. Who is more partisan than the unanimous SC. What is going on with all these sop called intellectuals? Is this something intentional to turn dumb?

These profs and gyimie paaa. Who is more partisan than the unanimous SC. What is going on with all these sop called intellectuals? Is this something intentional to turn dumb?
Osei Abebrese -917-476-3340 1 year ago

This useless idiot who never dreamt of speakership position is trying to interpret the law as if he is still living in his village in the north.He should find the solution to his impotency rather than turning his frustration ...
read full comment

This useless idiot who never dreamt of speakership position is trying to interpret the law as if he is still living in his village in the north.He should find the solution to his impotency rather than turning his frustration to the majority members in parliament
The Motherland 1 year ago

Prof Dinkum aka Prof Quack, the only thing that is emetic and putrid here is your jaundiced vituperations that can only come from a luridly quack prof.

Prof Dinkum aka Prof Quack, the only thing that is emetic and putrid here is your jaundiced vituperations that can only come from a luridly quack prof.
Yaw 1 year ago

so your point here is just insults? no added value??? very weak contribution, weak paaa.

so your point here is just insults? no added value??? very weak contribution, weak paaa.
Dan K 1 year ago

OFFCOURSE- HE DESERVES THE ABUSE WITH THIS STUPID WRITE UP. HOW COME THE SAME LAW WHICH WORKED FOR OQUAYE BE DIFFERENT FROM THAT OF BAGBIN?- SAME LAW.
BECUASE THE SUPREME COURT IS NOT PROFESSIONAL AND DOING THE BIDDING FOR T ...
read full comment

OFFCOURSE- HE DESERVES THE ABUSE WITH THIS STUPID WRITE UP. HOW COME THE SAME LAW WHICH WORKED FOR OQUAYE BE DIFFERENT FROM THAT OF BAGBIN?- SAME LAW.
BECUASE THE SUPREME COURT IS NOT PROFESSIONAL AND DOING THE BIDDING FOR THE NPP? YOU MUST BE JOKING
jesus 1 year ago

@Yaw. What is insulting here is the rants of the vermin that authored this article!

@Yaw. What is insulting here is the rants of the vermin that authored this article!
Yaw 1 year ago

I completely agree. Thank you. This concise yet impactful piece renders the opinions of social media commentators like Kwaku Azar and Kwasi Prempeh insignificant. Thank you again.

I completely agree. Thank you. This concise yet impactful piece renders the opinions of social media commentators like Kwaku Azar and Kwasi Prempeh insignificant. Thank you again.
Nsia 1 year ago

Lying scumbag Okoampa posing as Prof Dinkum is bad enough, now he is trying to pull wool over our eyes as 'Yaw' heaping praises on himself. And his piece of cowdung. Readers should not be fooled by the comments of Yaw. He ...
read full comment

Lying scumbag Okoampa posing as Prof Dinkum is bad enough, now he is trying to pull wool over our eyes as 'Yaw' heaping praises on himself. And his piece of cowdung. Readers should not be fooled by the comments of Yaw. He is Okoampa aka Prof Dinkum aka Yaw. Ahoofe, you are the ultimate slimeball.Shameless wanker!

Joseph N. Hill 1 year ago

This is insulting

This is insulting
Nick 1 year ago

The supreme court is too political period,

The supreme court is too political period,
HOW CAN BAGBIN THINK RIGHT WITH A PALMWINE TAPPER AS HIS ADVISER 1 year ago

Bagbin has thrown his legal career to the dogs in his last days. These faults of his have become law and will be cited forever and ever. I pity how he is feeling. And as for Sory at Law, come ooonnn all you had to do was to a ...
read full comment

Bagbin has thrown his legal career to the dogs in his last days. These faults of his have become law and will be cited forever and ever. I pity how he is feeling. And as for Sory at Law, come ooonnn all you had to do was to advise the Speaker to back off the course he had taken. You square squarely in this goof.
Ex-Pope 1 year ago

The Ghana Supreme Court has become a dirty joke as it continues to be a silent partner of Akufo-Addo and his devious scheme to break the 8. Only a demented liar and shameless child molester Prof. Kwame Okoampa-Ahoofe will ign ...
read full comment

The Ghana Supreme Court has become a dirty joke as it continues to be a silent partner of Akufo-Addo and his devious scheme to break the 8. Only a demented liar and shameless child molester Prof. Kwame Okoampa-Ahoofe will ignore the obvious and instead try to paint Speaker Bagbin as the bad guy in the latest shameful Supreme Court/NPP conniving episode. To the Supreme Court, it's no loner about the rule of law but rather all about how the court can twist matters to suit the Chief Justice's Julor House benefactor who planted her in that position to aid in the diabolical break the 8 scheme.
Godfred 1 year ago

It's because of people like you and others the country has failed. The heading says "Tenure of MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT" and the clause is " A MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT SHALL VACATE THEIR SEAT IF". THIS LAW COULDN'T APPLY TO YOU IF YO ...
read full comment

It's because of people like you and others the country has failed. The heading says "Tenure of MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT" and the clause is " A MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT SHALL VACATE THEIR SEAT IF". THIS LAW COULDN'T APPLY TO YOU IF YOU ARE NOT A MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT SO ITS A "NOW" SITUATION. NO ONE IN THE 8TH PARLIAMENT HAS AN AUTOMATIC PROMOTION TO THE 9TH PARLIAMENT. THIS MAKES THE LAW NOT A FUTURISTIC ONE. THE CONSTITUTION GRANTS ONLY THE SPEAKER THE RIGHT TO WORK IN PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS, IF THE COURTS GRANT AND THE SPEAKER DOESN'T APPLY, IT WONT WORK. I DONT UNDERSTAND WHY PEOPLE LIKE YOU DONT UNDERSTAND. ONCE YOU BECOME A MEMBER OF PARLIAMENT, THERE ARE RULES AND REGULATIONS YOU MUST ABIDE BY " STANDING ORDERS". EVERY JOB HAS A WAY TO LOSE IT, ONCE IT APPLIES, YOU ARE GONE, YOU DO NOT NEED OUTSIDE COURT TO DECIDE. ITS THERE PLAIN ENGLISH. IF A COURT WAS NEEDED TO DECIDE, IT WOULD STATE. SO THOSE PEOPLE WILL GO AND CAMPAIGN AGAINST AND FOR A PARTY THAT HAS ALREADY CHOSEN A REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE 9TH PARLIAMENT? USE YOUR BRAIN PLEASE... THERE WILL BE CIVIL WAR BECAUSE OF YOU GUYS NOT USING YOUR BRAINS.

15 Comments

Welcome,

SIGN IN

Welcome,

RESET PASSWORD

Hello,

Terms and conditions

REGISTER

The farces of Alban Bagbin are becoming emetic and putrid

Read Comments .st0{display:none;fill:#14BDD3;} .st1{display:none;} .st2{display:inline;fill:#FC0F0F;} .st3{display:inline;fill:#FFFFFF;} .st4{display:inline;fill:none;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:6;stroke-miterlimit:10;} Comments (15)

Read Comments Comments (15)