Court ruling on re-collation flawed

Read Comments Comments (7)

• Oooooooo 11 months ago

  Good lawyers appeal against court decisions. Substandard lawyers appeal at mob courts organized the studios of TV stations, Radio stations, press conferences, social media handles, party offices among cares, footsoldiers, vig ...
  read full comment

  Good lawyers appeal against court decisions. Substandard lawyers appeal at mob courts organized the studios of TV stations, Radio stations, press conferences, social media handles, party offices among cares, footsoldiers, vigilante groups etc. Court decisions are challenged and defeated at higher courts of competent jurisdiction, with valid and stronger legal arguments. Please media studios ban those lawyers who forment trouble within society.

  reply
• I am almost becoming a "POCKET LAWyER' now... 11 months ago

  How I love reading these educative articles.
  
  Beautiful it is.
  
  Lots of learning in this.
  
  Long live GHANA
  
  It's me Emil Akomah

  How I love reading these educative articles.
  
  Beautiful it is.
  
  Lots of learning in this.
  
  Long live GHANA
  
  It's me Emil Akomah

  reply
• Yaw 11 months ago

  The analysis provided is unhelpful. Laws are designed to ensure the smooth functioning of society. While they may not be perfect, they should be logical and acceptable to the majority. According to the author's analysis, it s ...
  read full comment

  The analysis provided is unhelpful. Laws are designed to ensure the smooth functioning of society. While they may not be perfect, they should be logical and acceptable to the majority. According to the author's analysis, it seems to suggest that we should gather large groups of people at polling stations to intimidate electoral officers or potentially bribe them to announce results in our favor. This approach disregards common sense and relies too heavily on technicalities. Let's focus on practical and sensible discussions instead.

  reply
• Abdul Sumed 11 months ago

  What Yaw is saying will then mean twisting the law to suit our interest and that is dangerous in a democracy.

  What Yaw is saying will then mean twisting the law to suit our interest and that is dangerous in a democracy.

  reply
• Kobby 11 months ago

  Rather what he is saying is that the law is in the bosom of the judge and it's refreshing that the judge applied common sense in his judgment. Only crooked minds and those who want to cheat will support a declaration without ...
  read full comment

  Rather what he is saying is that the law is in the bosom of the judge and it's refreshing that the judge applied common sense in his judgment. Only crooked minds and those who want to cheat will support a declaration without the full compliment of pink sheets from all polling stations. Have you thought about why the NDC is against the re-collation if they know their candidates truly won per the pink sheets they have?

  reply
• Yaw 11 months ago

  Thank you !

  Thank you !

  reply
• Yaw 11 months ago

  that's not I am say but thanks for responding without insults.

  that's not I am say but thanks for responding without insults.

  reply