A Shielded Gavel: The Chief Justice's style

Read Comments Comments (10)

• Nii 6 months ago

  Im struggling to understand your point. what wrong has she done

  Im struggling to understand your point. what wrong has she done

  reply
• Ola 6 months ago

  It is for the Commission to decide what wrong, if any, she has done. That's why it was put in place. It is not for the public, nor for her to decide that.

  It is for the Commission to decide what wrong, if any, she has done. That's why it was put in place. It is not for the public, nor for her to decide that.

  reply
• The Spear 6 months ago

  It's very obvious you don't understand the query by your question.
  
  It's simple: Citizens (Initial resolve started from Kwaku Azar) of this country - referring to a process in the Constitution that holds judges accountable ...
  read full comment

  It's very obvious you don't understand the query by your question.
  
  It's simple: Citizens (Initial resolve started from Kwaku Azar) of this country - referring to a process in the Constitution that holds judges accountable for wrongdoing - believe the Chief Justice trampled on or flout the laws of the country and petitioned the President of the Republic (First, Akufo-Addo, then Mahama) to undertake the requisite due process to get her removed from her position.
  
  That stance isn't final. All she needs is to follow the processes and respond to the queries or defend herself. If she's found not guilty of the accusations, she would be allowed to go back to her work. The only problem is that, by repeatedly challenging the petition and the processes, she's has shown she isn't knowledgeable about the contents of the Constitution; she doesn't know the law. No matter what she does therefore, she will be removed by force.
  
  Otherwise, how else would judges be held accountable if they run afoul of the law? They have better blood than we other Ghanaians, so they shouldn't be bothered? Otherwise saying, they should continue fooling and hurting the country?
  
  If you watch my posts since over ten years, I kept repeating Ghana would never be a good country because of the constricting urge of the dysfunctional and very corrupt Judiciary and Law Enforcement. If however, citizens are now rising to the challenge so the right things must be done in furtherance of the good cause of the country and we rile against them, are we not compounding issues?
  
  NO one person in Ghana is indispensable. Araba Gertrude Torkornoo is certainly not. So she should stop wasting our time. The different individuals who filed the petitions do so from their independent perspectives and convictions, so she couldn't summarily dismiss all of them as untenable.

  reply
• Ola 6 months ago

  It is too late now for her to be remembered as one who protected justice.

  It is too late now for her to be remembered as one who protected justice.

  reply
• OSAFO KANTANKA 6 months ago

  The behaviour of the Justice is beyond comprehension. It exposes a serious and extremely dangerous and complex Plots against our Establishment. That plot exposes or explains the Blatant Corruption and Abuse of Power during ...
  read full comment

  The behaviour of the Justice is beyond comprehension. It exposes a serious and extremely dangerous and complex Plots against our Establishment. That plot exposes or explains the Blatant Corruption and Abuse of Power during the government of Akufo Addo’s presidency . We are very lucky The Dark Cosmic powers and Deities AROUND PROTECTING our Country have Dutifully ACTED. These dangerous people, descendants of Real ENEMIES of our country are being destroyed by KARMA. They will try all the OLD Tricks in the world bookstore. But just WATCH Them Fall HARD . They will LIVE the rest of their lives Disgracefully and Die painfully IF they are not Careful. This Not me Cursing anybody. It is the Natural Law.

  reply
• Yu 6 months ago

  Ultimately preposterous is the continual call by the GBA leadership for the due constitutional process to be abridged and curtailed. As in the case of GBA v Attorney General ex parte Abban, the learned justices of the Supreme ...
  read full comment

  Ultimately preposterous is the continual call by the GBA leadership for the due constitutional process to be abridged and curtailed. As in the case of GBA v Attorney General ex parte Abban, the learned justices of the Supreme Court berated the then leadership for their ridiculous and ludicrous approach to their desire to remove the then Chief Justice.
  
  As a young lawyer, one is left bewildered and reeling with laughter seeing supposed seniors with year of experience fumbling and making a mockery of themselves over seemingly fundamental issues which a level 100 LLB student will with a little reading easily grasp.
  
  Until the leadership of the GBA set aside partisan coloration and really and truly become objective in their approach to national issues, they may soon like Gorbachev of the former USSR, find themselves leaders with no constituents to represent.
  
  
  Enough with the embarrassment. The profession is called learned for a reason

  reply
• Mama 6 months ago

  KAMA HAS GOT YOU TORKORNOO. OYAME ATUA WOKA WHAT YOU DID TO PEOPLE HAVE COME BACK TO YOU. Foolish woman

  KAMA HAS GOT YOU TORKORNOO. OYAME ATUA WOKA WHAT YOU DID TO PEOPLE HAVE COME BACK TO YOU. Foolish woman

  reply
• Mohammed Sadat Baba 6 months ago

  For it is stated that "mans rationality becomes overruled by his own deisres" (Aristotle, 384-322B.C.). Once the CJ took the decision not to submit to the same law she was protecting indicated how unethical she was in her lin ...
  read full comment

  For it is stated that "mans rationality becomes overruled by his own deisres" (Aristotle, 384-322B.C.). Once the CJ took the decision not to submit to the same law she was protecting indicated how unethical she was in her line of duty. Ethics consist of the actions an individual takes on him or herself. When the individual fails to take that action on him or herself, then it makes room for the larger group to take action on that said individual. And that amounts to justice, not what is determined by our whims and caprices.
  This is a masterpiece by Rashad Abdulai.

  reply
• Yaw Kyeretwie 6 months ago

  The Chief Justice's predicament highlights a crucial tension between accountability and due process. While the public understandably demands swift action, rushing to judgment risks undermining fundamental legal principles. ...
  read full comment

  The Chief Justice's predicament highlights a crucial tension between accountability and due process. While the public understandably demands swift action, rushing to judgment risks undermining fundamental legal principles. The Chief Justice deserves a fair trial, and her ignorance regarding the charges raises serious questions about the process's transparency and fairness. Potential procedural violations and the implications for judicial independence necessitate a cautious approach. True justice requires upholding the very foundations of our legal system, demanding transparent charges and adherence to due process. This will ensure a just resolution and reinforce public trust in the judiciary.
  
  Here's my breakdown of the Chief Justice's position:
  
  Precedent:Submitting the process could set a dangerous precedent, impacting future cases and judicial independence.
  
  Due Process: She may argue for internal judicial mechanisms, believing the proposed process deviates from established legal procedures.
  
  Separation of Powers: Protecting the judiciary's independence from other governmental branches is paramount.
  
  Context and Nuance: The article likely simplifies a complex situation. Undisclosed details and legal intricacies may justify her stance. Public Perception vs. Legal Correctness: While public perception is important, her primary responsibility is to uphold the law.
  
  The Chief Justice's potential reinstatement is a critical juncture for our democracy. It's vital to balance individual rights with the integrity of the office she holds. The judiciary, the third branch of government, plays a crucial role in upholding the rule of law and ensuring a balance of power. Respecting her individual rights, including due process and a fair trial, is paramount. However, equally important is safeguarding the integrity and impartiality of the Chief Justice's office. This delicate balance requires careful consideration, transparency, and a commitment to upholding the principles of justice and democracy.
  
  Expanding on this further:
  
  Individual Rights vs. Institutional Integrity: This situation forces us to confront the complex interplay between protecting individual rights and preserving the integrity of institutions. It's not a simple either/or scenario.
  
  Public Trust: The outcome of this situation will significantly impact public trust in the judiciary. A fair and transparent process is crucial to maintaining that trust.
  
  Long-Term Implications: This case's precedent could have long-term consequences for judicial independence and accountability.
  
  The Importance of an Independent Judiciary: A strong and independent judiciary is essential for a functioning democracy.
  
  This situation underscores the need to protect it from undue political influence.
  
  The focus should be on upholding the principles of justice and democracy, ensuring a fair process for the Chief Justice while protecting the judiciary's integrity. This will resolve the immediate situation and strengthen our democratic institutions for the future.
  
  PLEASE NOTE: I AM NOT A LAWYER.

  reply
• Kk 5 months ago

  All your comments show you are not truthful. The ndc disease will not help Ghana.
  Blame Mahama who was part of Airbus issues published by SFO in Uk here. He is even the president.
  If the lady has done something wrong come ...
  read full comment

  All your comments show you are not truthful. The ndc disease will not help Ghana.
  Blame Mahama who was part of Airbus issues published by SFO in Uk here. He is even the president.
  If the lady has done something wrong come clean and let us know. She is not above the law . By violecting her rights is the founders of ndc style. Please, never blame the chief justice. Blame The president and his corrupt cohorts. May the spirit of the land punish them

  reply