Nana Akufo Addo, “Patapaa” Will Delay Your Petition

Read Article

Comments (22)

This article is closed for comments.

Read Comments Comments (22)

Paul Amuna 12 years ago

It is borne of a misplaced arrogance by an individual who cannot accept the very legal structures that he a spouses and for which he was once a national servant in his capacity as attorney general. It is a pity that Nana and ...
read full comment

It is borne of a misplaced arrogance by an individual who cannot accept the very legal structures that he a spouses and for which he was once a national servant in his capacity as attorney general. It is a pity that Nana and his fellow NPP leaders commit blunder after blunder. Personally I doubt if he is really in control and driving this process. I have a feeling others like Jake Obetsebi Lamptey are driving this train which is rolling uncontrollably towards disaster.
Nana Yaw III 12 years ago

If he (Nana) is not in control (of his own executives), how then could he have controlled a whole nation?

If he (Nana) is not in control (of his own executives), how then could he have controlled a whole nation?
Taamiawu 12 years ago

Own ground rules for anything he does.
He and his team want to engage in trial by "ambush",which is raelly a technique of the past. 'Voire dire' or disclosure is now the accepted norm,and as we all know,his stance is yet ano ...
read full comment

Own ground rules for anything he does.
He and his team want to engage in trial by "ambush",which is raelly a technique of the past. 'Voire dire' or disclosure is now the accepted norm,and as we all know,his stance is yet another convenient way to shift blame on others. Check this out:
We, the petitioners,believe there were under-handed dealings in 4709 polling stations,but I don`t think it is necessary for the respondents to call witnesses from these polling stations to refute them.
We want the respondents to provide answer(s)to claims they are not familiar with,but we want them to prvide answers anyway.
As Tarzan has pointed out,all these are part of the "self-promotional gimmick" intended to deceive their supporters.
DAVID ATUGIYA 12 years ago

Paul, you have been diplomatic in your choice of words in describing Nana' behaviour. I will call it political stupidity. Please if the case of Nana and his legal jokers is not stupidity in their needless of objections as ...
read full comment

Paul, you have been diplomatic in your choice of words in describing Nana' behaviour. I will call it political stupidity. Please if the case of Nana and his legal jokers is not stupidity in their needless of objections as illustrated in Kofi's piece, then what it possible.

Logically, and in the interest of fairness and justice how could the President and the EC,
DAVID ATUGIYA 12 years ago

Paul, you have been diplomatic in your choice of words in describing Nana's behaviour. I will call it political stupidity. Please if the case. Of Nana and his legal jokers is not stupidity in their needless of their objection ...
read full comment

Paul, you have been diplomatic in your choice of words in describing Nana's behaviour. I will call it political stupidity. Please if the case. Of Nana and his legal jokers is not stupidity in their needless of their objections as illustrated in Kofi's piece, then what could it possibly be?

Logically, and in the interest of fairness and justice how could the President and the EC prepare to defend themselves if there are no disclosures from the petitioners?
Sanusi 12 years ago

Why? you are you a lawyer to worry us over this and that?
The accuser knows he has to prove period. Someone accused K4's brother of being a shareholder in metro mass transport. He could not produce the registration from the ...
read full comment

Why? you are you a lawyer to worry us over this and that?
The accuser knows he has to prove period. Someone accused K4's brother of being a shareholder in metro mass transport. He could not produce the registration from the Registrar General becuase he could not gain access there. The judge did not order Registrar General to produce the information. End of case. He was fined GHC6 billion those days and had to run for life.
Nana Yaw III 12 years ago

As I was reading through this article, “STRATEGY” kept popping up in my thoughts. So I asked: Could these objections be the strategy of one who knows he lost fairly and yet intends to make good the threat “If they make ...
read full comment

As I was reading through this article, “STRATEGY” kept popping up in my thoughts. So I asked: Could these objections be the strategy of one who knows he lost fairly and yet intends to make good the threat “If they make the wrong move by arresting any of our officers, they will know no peace and this country will suffer for that. We are not scared to be arrested but if they try to arrest any of us we will make this country ungovernable.”.?????

The above statement was made (by Kwadwo Owusu Afriyie, General Secretary, New Patriotic Party) on the 12th of December 2012, some 3 days after the declaration of the results. He justified this assertion by telling the world that the NPP, in the wake of disturbances carried out by their supporters, had gathered intelligence that government was going to arrest some of their leaders. Before this, we heard on various campaign platforms of how some leaders of the NPP were not ready to accept any results that did not declare them as winners.

They have taken the case to court, and till now, as you rightly put it, they are the only ones that are raising objections and causing delays to the process. So is this a strategy? Is this a strategy to sow doubts (in the minds of citizens and the international community) on the validity of the results, knowing that the allegations cannot be proved in court? When one adds these objections to the boycotts, it is fair to start assuming that the current strategy of the leaders of the NPP is to “make the nation ungovernable.” They said it, and they are pursuing it.

Fortunately for Ghana, the law allows for a president to be sworn in and government to continue functioning even in the course of a legal challenge of the validity of an election’s results. Fortunately for us there are parliamentarians in the majority who will move this nation forward even in the “unfortunate and possibly reckless absence” of their minority colleagues.

Your article is a nice one. I enjoyed reading it. As for Mahama’s 4,800 witnesses, do not worry. I doubt if they will end up in court. But it all depends on the petitioners. If they come out with some strange narrations of what happened in the 4,709 polling stations where they allege the irregularities then of course, the court may decide to bring in as many of Mahama’s 4,800 witnesses to give their version.
private mensah 12 years ago

thanks for this wonderful piece Nana should read it

thanks for this wonderful piece Nana should read it
FORGED PINK SHEETS 12 years ago

Everybody is afraid of Nana. Even the legal team. If he says so they will do it for him. Nana is not good as a lawyer and listening to him and using his strategy will lose the case for NPP. The legal team has a big problem. ...
read full comment

Everybody is afraid of Nana. Even the legal team. If he says so they will do it for him. Nana is not good as a lawyer and listening to him and using his strategy will lose the case for NPP. The legal team has a big problem. This is the case when your client thinks he is rather the lawyer.
Solomon Dormenyo Quist 12 years ago

The interesting thing about reading such in-depth analysis is that, it is bereft of the woolly-brained comments from howlers who find such articles above their comprehension.

The interesting thing about reading such in-depth analysis is that, it is bereft of the woolly-brained comments from howlers who find such articles above their comprehension.

Nii Gbemi 12 years ago

Wow, thanks for the in depth legal narrations, these sums up all the stupid bravado of our NPP useless so called former attorney general. He hasn't got a clue of all the legal wranglings by our own legal team. At least we hav ...
read full comment

Wow, thanks for the in depth legal narrations, these sums up all the stupid bravado of our NPP useless so called former attorney general. He hasn't got a clue of all the legal wranglings by our own legal team. At least we have few commentators on this article because the intelligence shown in your piece is beyond them.
Kwasi Ntiamoah, California 12 years ago

Those who rain insults on writers who seek to ltell the truth are the ones who really are either half educated and therefore find those articles incomprehensible or thier political loyalty and fanatic temdency have beclouded ...
read full comment

Those who rain insults on writers who seek to ltell the truth are the ones who really are either half educated and therefore find those articles incomprehensible or thier political loyalty and fanatic temdency have beclouded thier thinking. What a nice piece of writing
Nyame Ekuma 12 years ago

NPP lost the elections with HUMPTY DUMPTY having a great fall.

NPP shd continue to burn Ghana. They shd burn the Ministry of Foreign affairs, lands commission, markets , and farms.

They shd also burn the sea and the riv ...
read full comment

NPP lost the elections with HUMPTY DUMPTY having a great fall.

NPP shd continue to burn Ghana. They shd burn the Ministry of Foreign affairs, lands commission, markets , and farms.

They shd also burn the sea and the rivers and lakes and lagoons to deprive Ghana of fish. Nonsense.
Concerned Citizen 12 years ago

Kofi, your analyses are good but I disagree with you on some points. Are you aware or not, that the EC have started tampering with some biometric machines used at some polling stations when threats of petition were made?

A ...
read full comment

Kofi, your analyses are good but I disagree with you on some points. Are you aware or not, that the EC have started tampering with some biometric machines used at some polling stations when threats of petition were made?

Anyway, you should not behave like an ostrich that plays ignorance when the reality on the ground is in contrast to its beliefs. Do you not know what these NDC guys and Afari-Gyan are capable of as crooks as they are? Giving them those detail information before hand will let them carry out their usual nefarious activities in attempt to obliterate the truth. The requested information will be provided to them during the trial which possibility you have asserted is feasible.

As the EC are being given copies of proofs covering the disputed polling stations, it will be required of them to supply the copies of pink and blue papers covering same polling stations.

The legal team of Nana Addo should make a simultaneous request to the EC via the Supreme Court to supply the team with all the pink/blue sheets covering all the 26,000 polling stations. Then both teams (EC and Nana Addo) will exchange the copies as requested by each at the same time. This will make it difficult for each of them to alter any evidence once exchanged.

The EC should not be allowed to know the contested polling stations beforehand. I don't trust the EC and the NDC. They are crooks who are capable of executing any silly acts that they deem will enhance their chances of acquiring whatever they dream of.
Joseph 12 years ago

Can you please let us know how the EC has tampered or is tampering with the biometric machines? Do you know personally or you obtained the information on authority and a reliable as such. You claim Afari Gyan is a crook, si ...
read full comment

Can you please let us know how the EC has tampered or is tampering with the biometric machines? Do you know personally or you obtained the information on authority and a reliable as such. You claim Afari Gyan is a crook, since when did he turn a crook? Was it 2000, 2004 or just before 2008? It seems you are talikng from your heart (biased) and not from your brain (reality).
Kofi Ata, Cambridge, UK 12 years ago

Mr/Miss/Mrs or whatever title you bear, I knew people in very high positions at the Castle in the PNDC days that posted articles in the Daily Graphic and the Times using the name "Concerned Citizen". Were you one of them?

...
read full comment

Mr/Miss/Mrs or whatever title you bear, I knew people in very high positions at the Castle in the PNDC days that posted articles in the Daily Graphic and the Times using the name "Concerned Citizen". Were you one of them?

Any way, as you will agree with me the subject matter of the article was not about tempering with evidence and therefore your concerns about EC or any other party tempering with pink or blue sheets is irrelevant to the article.

You are right to suggest that the petitioners could also request the EC for original copies of the pink and read sheets covering the 26,000 polling stations. However, will that be necessary since the petitioners are only disputing results from less than 5,000 polling stations? Would that not be another time wasting, which is the subject matter of this article?

In my view, the best way to fasten this petition will be for the legal teams of the petitioners, the first, second and third respondents to meet and agreed on exchange of information/documents outside the court and only go to court for an order if any parties is reluctant to release information/documents requested.
DAN 12 years ago

Master you have written a very intelligent piece but please be informed that the NPP and their leader know that they will definitely lose the case that is why they are playing the delay and blame tactics. we have read through ...
read full comment

Master you have written a very intelligent piece but please be informed that the NPP and their leader know that they will definitely lose the case that is why they are playing the delay and blame tactics. we have read through the lines already so please save your breathe and your ink and let the 3 people keep deceiving their supporters into thinking a miracle will happen.
Whatever 12 years ago

I share your searching thoughts except on one. That is, the defeated NPP alleged that 14 million people voted in their petition. This is an unmistakable inflation from the 10million people the EC had announced publicly to eve ...
read full comment

I share your searching thoughts except on one. That is, the defeated NPP alleged that 14 million people voted in their petition. This is an unmistakable inflation from the 10million people the EC had announced publicly to every listening ear. This humongous error by the NPP cannot be prima facie. Bawumia's Distortion of the definition of over-voting and undervoting cannot be prima-facie. This deliberate erros by the NPP makes their case on its face value a useless case
Paul Amuna 12 years ago

So you want us to believe that the EC in the glare of this 'unwanted' publicity and with the very foundations of our democracy and it's own credibility at stake, will go "destroying biometric machines"? Which planet have you ...
read full comment

So you want us to believe that the EC in the glare of this 'unwanted' publicity and with the very foundations of our democracy and it's own credibility at stake, will go "destroying biometric machines"? Which planet have you just landed from? Please don't 'eat every pap you are fed with'. In other words, don't believe any cheap propaganda put out there.
Akoffo Addo 12 years ago

oh Mr Kofi Ata,what shall i do with you?you have really reminded me of my days at uni of science and technology.you have really demonstrated how level minded you are.if only the npp supporters know about law,then they would t ...
read full comment

oh Mr Kofi Ata,what shall i do with you?you have really reminded me of my days at uni of science and technology.you have really demonstrated how level minded you are.if only the npp supporters know about law,then they would think twice.i do agree with every single word or sentence from you.its sad and shame that the average Ghanaian,even including people,students and to say educated elites who has no law background can't understand that what you have written here is what hapens with court cases.i wish most people will read to understand as a lot of people talk rubbish here without sidelining the petition and the comstitution/law to know what happens.how is Npp going to proof beyond reasonable doubt?how come these npp lawyers couldnt foresee that the composition,the joinder of the NDc etc will not hold?NDC and Mahama stand in a fiduciary relationship in legal terms,in other words are inseperable.how could they not foresee that,the sc will allow the joinder.how are they going to proof that NDC or any othe party had this figure or that to favour NDC?do they not know that the courts can or will allow them to provide their so called strong evidence even before court proceedings?even if the court does not,are they aware when a question is asked,the ec can ask for time to go and look into the matter and come back later to ask?i can go on and on.all i say is well done.i have noticed that most people here who wrote articles here sidelining the petition and the constitution means the npp willloose.it takes only those who know law to realise this.Kofi stay blessed.

togi 12 years ago

great piece!! lets see what happens next

great piece!! lets see what happens next
capsules for lose weight 12 years ago

qkKhI3 wow, awesome blog article.Much thanks again. Want more.

qkKhI3 wow, awesome blog article.Much thanks again. Want more.

22 Comments

Welcome,

SIGN IN

Welcome,

RESET PASSWORD

Hello,

Terms and conditions

REGISTER

Nana Akufo Addo, “Patapaa” Will Delay Your Petition

Read Comments .st0{display:none;fill:#14BDD3;} .st1{display:none;} .st2{display:inline;fill:#FC0F0F;} .st3{display:inline;fill:#FFFFFF;} .st4{display:inline;fill:none;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:6;stroke-miterlimit:10;} Comments (22)

Read Comments Comments (22)