Quarshie Idun, Tony Lithur nail Mahama

Read Comments Comments (8)

• iPad 12 years ago

  This is not a matter of the respondents lawyers not understanding the issues. It is a matter of facts and truth. One can not overturn facts I,e. data and figures - and the truth in front of intellectuals - period

  This is not a matter of the respondents lawyers not understanding the issues. It is a matter of facts and truth. One can not overturn facts I,e. data and figures - and the truth in front of intellectuals - period

  reply
• Hk 12 years ago

  May be u have not understood the issue of cross examination. The lawyers don't need to pull out each and every pink sheet and analyse but rather have to take a sample of the pink sheets create doubts about them which will hav ...
  read full comment

  May be u have not understood the issue of cross examination. The lawyers don't need to pull out each and every pink sheet and analyse but rather have to take a sample of the pink sheets create doubts about them which will have effect all all the 11000 pink sheets you are talking about. Imagine each lawyer has to pick the pink sheets one by one and cross examine. Bawumia. You can imagine how long the case will go

  reply
• FUI 12 years ago

  Good point HK, they can't bring out all the pink sheets or the case will never end. On the other hand, these respondents have done a terrible job. Their arguments don't hold water. To Ipad's point, you cannot overturn facts a ...
  read full comment

  Good point HK, they can't bring out all the pink sheets or the case will never end. On the other hand, these respondents have done a terrible job. Their arguments don't hold water. To Ipad's point, you cannot overturn facts and that is the issue faced by the respondents

  reply
• Kwadwo 12 years ago

  I am also puzzled by the blatant admissions of errors made by the Respondents' attorneys.With these admissions, the only issue left to be determined by the Court is whether the errors or irregularities substantially affects t ...
  read full comment

  I am also puzzled by the blatant admissions of errors made by the Respondents' attorneys.With these admissions, the only issue left to be determined by the Court is whether the errors or irregularities substantially affects the results declared by the EC. It seems to me that the Petitioners will easily meet this burden given the evidence adused thus far. It is getting interesting.

  reply
• Kwobia-Toronto 12 years ago

  I think you are looking at the case from the wrong angle.

  I think you are looking at the case from the wrong angle.

  reply
• tiger shark 12 years ago

  There cannot be a Nation wide election without Errors.Electoral Errors happen in countries with a more
  advanced electoral Gadgets as ours.We will all agree Errors are not fraud.

  There cannot be a Nation wide election without Errors.Electoral Errors happen in countries with a more
  advanced electoral Gadgets as ours.We will all agree Errors are not fraud.

  reply
• kk 12 years ago

  U have your own English, what is Error? Erros are mistake and if find more than three they are no longer mistake they are now premeditated Errors and premeditated Errors are fraud

  U have your own English, what is Error? Erros are mistake and if find more than three they are no longer mistake they are now premeditated Errors and premeditated Errors are fraud

  reply
• kk 12 years ago

  If you came by error then you must go by error

  If you came by error then you must go by error

  reply