Tsatsu Tsikata Needs Anger Management Training

Read Article

Comments (33)

This article is closed for comments.

Read Comments Comments (33)

KWAKU 12 years ago

TSATSU THE BRAINLESS UNCIVILIZED MAN

TSATSU THE BRAINLESS UNCIVILIZED MAN
BISHOP 12 years ago

This is exactly what is killing Ghana and most of Africa. People go through dry schooling without and practical knowledge and ability to demonstrate common sense. A system that was established by the European needing serious ...
read full comment

This is exactly what is killing Ghana and most of Africa. People go through dry schooling without and practical knowledge and ability to demonstrate common sense. A system that was established by the European needing serious upgrading so our country's graduates could compete with the best in the world. This has unfortunately not happened, I wonder when.

Unfortunate as in the case of Ghana we praise this book-long know nothing fools, honor them like demigods and hand them the destiny of the country once they graduate and the results are there for us all to see.

Tsatsu is a no brainier like we had been made to believe all along, he is your typical African graduate full of pomposity due to blind praise and less access to education by many at their time.

Its time we start honoring people that can clearly demonstrate their abilities outside of the classroom before entrusting the destiny of our country into their hands.

A good article
BB 12 years ago

Bishop do u even have such book long knowledge

Bishop do u even have such book long knowledge
SILASMANNER 12 years ago

It is clear from the ongoing cross examination of Dr Bawumia by Tsikata that the latter is not a luminary as has been speculated.Tsikata has no record of cases won in his name.
He is seen to be repeating questions which amou ...
read full comment

It is clear from the ongoing cross examination of Dr Bawumia by Tsikata that the latter is not a luminary as has been speculated.Tsikata has no record of cases won in his name.
He is seen to be repeating questions which amounts to nothing.
Baffled and confused because Dr. Bawumia has been consistent and fearless,Tsatsu has resorted to anger,intimidation and shouting.
GHANA 12 years ago

A lawyer who could not defend himself and was sent to Jail and after a short experience of Prison faked sickness.....Go straight to the Point..do not use your emotions...

A lawyer who could not defend himself and was sent to Jail and after a short experience of Prison faked sickness.....Go straight to the Point..do not use your emotions...
Musah Osman 12 years ago

Akufo Addo should have safe Bawumia from all these troubles.If nana is truly a lawyer as we are made to believe,why didn't he spare Bawumia this agony? since the issues at stake borders on law.Stop 'inflating' Akufo Addo for ...
read full comment

Akufo Addo should have safe Bawumia from all these troubles.If nana is truly a lawyer as we are made to believe,why didn't he spare Bawumia this agony? since the issues at stake borders on law.Stop 'inflating' Akufo Addo for he shall never lead this nation Ghana.
BB 12 years ago

I am sure Mr.Ghana u are either ignorant of the circumstances surrounding his imprisonment or you were not in Ghana at that time. It had to take president kuffour appointing Justice Afreh(late) and another justice whose name ...
read full comment

I am sure Mr.Ghana u are either ignorant of the circumstances surrounding his imprisonment or you were not in Ghana at that time. It had to take president kuffour appointing Justice Afreh(late) and another justice whose name I have forgotten to take him to prison. Pls when writing present facts don't be like ur bosses(the short man or Akuffo Addo,Jake and Bawumia(I feel sorry for him he is being used by the NPP,sure he'll be dumped later)
CARDINAL 12 years ago

Tsatsu was convicted and sent to prison not by the Supreme Court as you are alluding here but it was rather a High Court lady Lawyer who sent him to prison by using GNPC money as if it was his own money to guarantee loans for ...
read full comment

Tsatsu was convicted and sent to prison not by the Supreme Court as you are alluding here but it was rather a High Court lady Lawyer who sent him to prison by using GNPC money as if it was his own money to guarantee loans for friends.
KK 12 years ago

I was so much ashamed for "self acclaimed legal lunatic" to insult his colleague. So, so, so ashamed and he must put his head in shame.

I was so much ashamed for "self acclaimed legal lunatic" to insult his colleague. So, so, so ashamed and he must put his head in shame.
Concerned Ghanaian 12 years ago

I am very dissappointed in Tsatsu,,,He ought to be ashamed of himself. He certainly needs to attend an Anger Management workshop...Big SHAME!!

I am very dissappointed in Tsatsu,,,He ought to be ashamed of himself. He certainly needs to attend an Anger Management workshop...Big SHAME!!

Osikani 12 years ago

Infraction Tsatsu is behaving like a KG pupil. He seems not to know his left from right and trying to fight in court. Ndc law wizard is now found wanting!!!!

Infraction Tsatsu is behaving like a KG pupil. He seems not to know his left from right and trying to fight in court. Ndc law wizard is now found wanting!!!!
Joe Boateng ---Dabaa . 12 years ago

Of course this Ex-con needs Anger Mnagement Training.Send him back to Togo where he came from.Idiot

Of course this Ex-con needs Anger Mnagement Training.Send him back to Togo where he came from.Idiot
Kwame Boateng 12 years ago

The man is struggling to live the hype around him....Yes at Accra New Town Experimental where we were mates he was great, and as a young lawyer he was a genius BUT, truth be told, he has lost his shine! Period!

The man is struggling to live the hype around him....Yes at Accra New Town Experimental where we were mates he was great, and as a young lawyer he was a genius BUT, truth be told, he has lost his shine! Period!
ATO 12 years ago

ADDISON GOT EXACTLY WHAT HE DESERVES. HE HAS BEEN EMPLOYING THIS DISRUPTIVE TACTIC TO INTERRUPT THE FLOW OF MR. TSIKATA'S CROSS-EXAMINATION AND UNFORTUNATELY THE COURT HAS ALLOWED HIM TO ENGAGE IN THIS UNETHICAL TACTIC WITHOU ...
read full comment

ADDISON GOT EXACTLY WHAT HE DESERVES. HE HAS BEEN EMPLOYING THIS DISRUPTIVE TACTIC TO INTERRUPT THE FLOW OF MR. TSIKATA'S CROSS-EXAMINATION AND UNFORTUNATELY THE COURT HAS ALLOWED HIM TO ENGAGE IN THIS UNETHICAL TACTIC WITHOUT ANY REPROACH. IT APPEARS THIS COURT IS BENDING OVER BACKWARDS TO PLEASE THE NPP.
K.K. 12 years ago

ATO, YOU ARE AS BLOCK HEADED AS TSIKATA HIMSELF OTHER THAN THAT YOU WOULD KNOW THAT RAISING OBJECTIONS TO DUMB QUESTIONS ARE PART OF CROSS EXAMINATION. GET SOME EDUCATION, DUMMIE

ATO, YOU ARE AS BLOCK HEADED AS TSIKATA HIMSELF OTHER THAN THAT YOU WOULD KNOW THAT RAISING OBJECTIONS TO DUMB QUESTIONS ARE PART OF CROSS EXAMINATION. GET SOME EDUCATION, DUMMIE
Kofi Agyemang 12 years ago

Tsatsu is simply deflated. Gone are the days when they were few lawyers in Ghana and people like Tsatsu were supposedly touted as great lawyers. Seriously if I had practised law I think I could have done a much better job. Wh ...
read full comment

Tsatsu is simply deflated. Gone are the days when they were few lawyers in Ghana and people like Tsatsu were supposedly touted as great lawyers. Seriously if I had practised law I think I could have done a much better job. Why is Tsatsu not punching holes in the analysis Bawumia and the NPP have put out. Bawumia has consistently said the pink sheets have been used once in the analysis. I was expecting Tsatsu to punch holes in that rather than follow Tony Lithur who obviously was so lost in his cross examination which made him ask the same question like a 1000 times. Charley Bawumia no size.
Kwadwo 12 years ago

What Tsatsu did today can't happen in a traffic court let alone the Supreme Court of Ghana. I have tried a lot of cases in the US and I have never experienced counsel in open court tell opposing counsel to "shut up" and get a ...
read full comment

What Tsatsu did today can't happen in a traffic court let alone the Supreme Court of Ghana. I have tried a lot of cases in the US and I have never experienced counsel in open court tell opposing counsel to "shut up" and get away with it. Such an outburst will immediately bring the wrath of the trial Judge or a disciplinary complaint against the offending lawyer. Tsatu's conduct is disgraceful and he should be sanctioned. It appears his time in Nsawam wounded him and he is angry at the whole world. He is not helping his client with his anger in the courtroom.
TNC 12 years ago

Shut up Justice !!!
You hypocrite,i say shut up.

Shut up Justice !!!
You hypocrite,i say shut up.
Chabba 12 years ago

Tsikata is increasing becoming edgy and frustrated because he has realized his much anticipated wizardry cross examination is a complete debacle. Dr. Bawumia is too smart for him. Now at least, Tsikata has seen a big differen ...
read full comment

Tsikata is increasing becoming edgy and frustrated because he has realized his much anticipated wizardry cross examination is a complete debacle. Dr. Bawumia is too smart for him. Now at least, Tsikata has seen a big difference between his current formal cross examination and his past communist
interrogation of Amartey Kwei.
Nana Yaw 12 years ago

He is not what he is purported to be. He is just ordinary, nothing special.

He is not what he is purported to be. He is just ordinary, nothing special.

Kwenu Turkson 12 years ago

This fool will have been thrown out of the courtroom in any civilized realm. Like his inward looking bully boy buddy kwakuvi jerry john, they both need anger management.

This fool will have been thrown out of the courtroom in any civilized realm. Like his inward looking bully boy buddy kwakuvi jerry john, they both need anger management.
Obenefo 12 years ago

So is the Ndc going to ask for a refund of legal fees from Tsatsu.

So is the Ndc going to ask for a refund of legal fees from Tsatsu.
Justice Kpegah 12 years ago

Tsatsu has nothing better to ask. He is a failure and not making any sense at all.

Tsatsu has nothing better to ask. He is a failure and not making any sense at all.
ERIC 12 years ago

TSATSU ADDISON IS TOUGH MINDED GUY YOU MET YOUR MATCH' GOD BLESS GHANA

TSATSU ADDISON IS TOUGH MINDED GUY YOU MET YOUR MATCH' GOD BLESS GHANA
LONTO-BOY 12 years ago

OKATAKYIE SARPONG, I must admit that I hardly follow the on going 'circus' at the Supreme Court but I watched the proceedings yesterday. Actually, I was astonished to see Mr Tsatsu Tsikata, an eminent scholar/academic and leg ...
read full comment

OKATAKYIE SARPONG, I must admit that I hardly follow the on going 'circus' at the Supreme Court but I watched the proceedings yesterday. Actually, I was astonished to see Mr Tsatsu Tsikata, an eminent scholar/academic and legal brain losing his temper. In cross examination, losing one's temper sometimes will imply that the witness got the best of the cross-examiner. If Tsikata feels he was being 'disrupted' by Mr Addison's objections, he could have respected the courtroom by being courteous and patient in his attempt to carry on with his line of questioning.

Most probably, Tsatsu felt his ego was being punctured by those objections, hence his 'shut up'-intimidating and condescending scream at Addison. Tsatsu fell into a 'baited trap' in cross-examination. This is Cross-examination, not Verbal Wrestling Contest!
CARDINAL 12 years ago

Okayakyie LONTO, Tsatsu is used to having his way during the P/NDC days when a word from his mouth caould spell a death s3entence for somebody and he was feared. He is still living in those past days which is not relevant any ...
read full comment

Okayakyie LONTO, Tsatsu is used to having his way during the P/NDC days when a word from his mouth caould spell a death s3entence for somebody and he was feared. He is still living in those past days which is not relevant anymore. He has failed to win the intelligence debate with Dr. Bawumiah and he wants to resort to bullying tactics.

As we say in Twi;

"SE BODAMNII ANI TE A, ENYE KAKRA A, WO DE HUNAHUNA NKWADAA"

Tsatsu is still living in the past.
abedu 12 years ago

There is a difference between “Can you shut up?” and "shut up". Tsatsu only asked mr. Addison wether he can shut up? Asking mr Addison to "shut up" would have been a command and disrespectfull, which he Tsatsu did not do ...
read full comment

There is a difference between “Can you shut up?” and "shut up". Tsatsu only asked mr. Addison wether he can shut up? Asking mr Addison to "shut up" would have been a command and disrespectfull, which he Tsatsu did not do. The Judges could have intervained if he did that. That is why they kept mute. Mr. Addison could have answered "yes" or "no", I don´t personally see anything wrong with Tsatsu´s question. It is rather a disrespect if mr. Addison did not answer him. We are to learn from this Tsatsu. The Lawyers of the NPP should know this and stop misleading us.
Can Addison sue Tsatu for asking him "whether he can shut up?"
SANCTIMONIOUSLY 12 years ago

TSIKATA IS DOIUNG JUST FINE. HE IS NOT STANDING ON A POLITICAL PLATFORM TO WIN SYMPATHY VOTES. HE IS BRINGING HIS KNOWLEDGE OF THE LAW TO BARE ON THIS STUPIC CASE. HE IS ASKING THE RIGHT QUESTIONS, PRESSING WHERE HE SHOULD PR ...
read full comment

TSIKATA IS DOIUNG JUST FINE. HE IS NOT STANDING ON A POLITICAL PLATFORM TO WIN SYMPATHY VOTES. HE IS BRINGING HIS KNOWLEDGE OF THE LAW TO BARE ON THIS STUPIC CASE. HE IS ASKING THE RIGHT QUESTIONS, PRESSING WHERE HE SHOULD PRESS, RAISE HIS VOICE WHEN IT IS NECESSARY AND YOU SEE, HE WAITS FOR SOME SECONDS FOR THE WITNESS TO SWALLOW SOME SALIVA BEFORE HE CONFRONTS WITH ANOTHER QUESTION. HIS STUDENT LAWYERS ARE SEEING RED AND THEY WOULD LIKE TO HANG HIM BEFORE THE END OF THE CASE. HE IS HURTING SOME PEOPLE AND THEIR PARTY AND HE SHOULD DO THAT TO THE END. THOSE WHO DONT LIKE HIS STYLE SHOULD GO AND SHAVE THEIR SMELLING ARMPITS. TSIKATA YOU ARE AN IMMORTAL. PLEASE FUCK THEM ALL FOR ME. THEIR ARROGANCE, THIEFERY AND UNCONTROLLED AMBITION WILL BE BROUGHT TO NOTHING. GOOOOO TSIKATA GO AT THEM.
BB 12 years ago

Mr. Justice Sarpong can u tell me how many cases all the lawyers of the petitioners have won. If nothing at all he won the case on the constitutionality of the fast track high court . I sincerely side with him. The incessant ...
read full comment

Mr. Justice Sarpong can u tell me how many cases all the lawyers of the petitioners have won. If nothing at all he won the case on the constitutionality of the fast track high court . I sincerely side with him. The incessant objections from Addison makes delivery slow and arduous.
CARDINAL 12 years ago

What you don't understand is that, Addison is objecting and winning his objections because Tsatsu is asking questions that the law does not allow him to cross the Witness about.

Let me give you a clear example of what Tsat ...
read full comment

What you don't understand is that, Addison is objecting and winning his objections because Tsatsu is asking questions that the law does not allow him to cross the Witness about.

Let me give you a clear example of what Tsatsu is trying to do that is not allow by the law. The Witness has been led in evidence by the Petitioners lawyer Addison. Tsatsu can only cross examine him by the evidence that was put before the court and cannot ask him questions that was not presented in evidence and Tsatsu has tried many times to do that and any good lawyer will object to such sophomoric tactics by Tsatsu.

CARDINAL 12 years ago

"If nothing at all he won the case on the constitutionality of the fast track high court ."

Sorry I forgot to address this issue you raised. Tsatsu could not be credited of winning any Fast Track court case because he was ...
read full comment

"If nothing at all he won the case on the constitutionality of the fast track high court ."

Sorry I forgot to address this issue you raised. Tsatsu could not be credited of winning any Fast Track court case because he was not the Lawyer on record on this case but was a Defendent who did not defend himself as his own lawyer but he hired other Lawyers to defend him. Actually he did not win on this case but the Fast Track High Court was found to be Constitutional.

Fast Track Courts Are Now Constitutional -SC
By GNA

The Supreme Court (SC) by a six-five-majority verdict on Wednesday reversed its earlier decision on the constitutionality of the Fast Track Court (FTC).
The six judges made up of the Chief Justice, Mr Justice Edward Kwame Wiredu, Mr Justice George Acquah, Mr Justice Williams Atugubah, Mrs Justice Sophia Akuffo, Mr Justice George Lamptey and Mr justice Kwame Afreh held the view that the FTC was not alien to the Constitution.
The five dissenting Judges, who were hitherto in the majority and maintained their earlier decision that FTC was unconstitutional were: Mrs Justice Joyce Bamford Addo, Mr Justice A. K. B. Ampiah, Mr Justice F. Y. Kpegah, Mr Justice E. D. K. Adjabeng and Mr Justice Thoedore Kwame Adzoe.
The court awarded a cost of 10 million cedis against Tsatsu Tsikata, former Chief Executive of the Ghana National Petroleum Corporation (GNPC), who brought the application, challenging the constitutionality of the FTC.
Tsikata was arraigned at the FTC for wilfully causing financial loss of 2.15 billion cedis to the State. He allegedly circumvented laid-down corporate objectives of GNPC, when he by-passed the Board and on his own, committed the GNPC to guarantee a loan.
The amount, 5.5 million French Francs was granted by Caise Francaise de Development, a French Aid Agency to Valley Farm, private cocoa-growing company, in which GNPC held initial equity shares of 17.39 per cent.
Distressed, Valley Farm defaulted in the repayment of the loan and without prior approval of the GNPC Board, Tsikata allegedly paid out of its operational funds, the principal amount plus interest, all totalling 6,919,123. 23 French Francs.
This action of his, adversely affected the financial status of GNPC, hence a loss to the State. Tsikata did not plead to the charge and the trial judge. Mr. Justice Julius Ansah entered a plea of not guilty for him and admitted him to a 500 million-cedi self-recognisance bail. In his application before the Supreme Court Tsikata stated that the FTC had no jurisdiction to try him.
At Wednesday's sitting, while the majority contended that the Chief Justice (CJ) had discretionary powers under the constitution to create divisions of the High Court, which the FTC was one, their counterparts on the minority side, maintained that the FTC needed parliamentary approval to bring it into being.
The majority argued that since Article 136 (4) of the 1992 Constitution conferred on the CJ, the exclusive powers to set divisions of the High Court, the FTC which he helped to establish remained legal. To them, the FTC was an innovation of the High Court in that it used automated systems that helped to speed up proceedings to ensure the quick delivery of justice.
The majority argued further that Article 139 (2) did not spell out methods for the CJ to create new courts, clause (3) of that same article, however prescribed that the CJ established courts to try criminal, civil, investment and other related matters, hence the establishment of the FTC.
The judges with dissenting view, stated that the CJ had no discretionary powers to create divisions of the High Court and to do so, he needed the nod from Parliament.
Kweku Asante 12 years ago

like your father.stupid article

like your father.stupid article
Justice Kpegah 12 years ago

With your low IQ, that is not bad for somebody who is retarded.

With your low IQ, that is not bad for somebody who is retarded.

33 Comments

Welcome,

SIGN IN

Welcome,

RESET PASSWORD

Hello,

Terms and conditions

REGISTER

Tsatsu Tsikata Needs Anger Management Training

Read Comments .st0{display:none;fill:#14BDD3;} .st1{display:none;} .st2{display:inline;fill:#FC0F0F;} .st3{display:inline;fill:#FFFFFF;} .st4{display:inline;fill:none;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:6;stroke-miterlimit:10;} Comments (33)

Read Comments Comments (33)