Who Is Speaking The Truth: NDC Or NPP?

Read Comments Comments (16)

• Ghana 12 years ago

  Idiot Koku aka Margaret Jackson, you can crow all you like to your idiotic Ndc supporters about 24 boxes initially all you like, there is no record anywhere that the initial box count was 24, not from KPMG or from the court o ...
  read full comment

  Idiot Koku aka Margaret Jackson, you can crow all you like to your idiotic Ndc supporters about 24 boxes initially all you like, there is no record anywhere that the initial box count was 24, not from KPMG or from the court or petitioners. It was only from Tsatsu and and his ex-convict friends who counted the boxes in their heads. They knew the count was going against them so they have to put this false count of boxes in their suppoters heads.
  
  Let Tsatsu show that there was an evidence apart from what they are telling us because KPMG has come out to debunk their assertion of 24 boxes.

  reply
• THAT MARGARET JACKSON 12 years ago

  So whom do you suspect? the supreme court, its registrar, kpmg, npp or tsikata the thief?

  So whom do you suspect? the supreme court, its registrar, kpmg, npp or tsikata the thief?

  reply
• Paul Amuna 12 years ago

  I condemn in the strongest terms those of you who have nothing else to say but to come to this forum to insult people and use such vulgarities. If you disagree with Margaret's views, by all means make your point, and make it ...
  read full comment

  I condemn in the strongest terms those of you who have nothing else to say but to come to this forum to insult people and use such vulgarities. If you disagree with Margaret's views, by all means make your point, and make it strongly but you make a complete fool of yourself when you sink so low.
  
  How do you expect others to see you? Have you any children of your own? and / or nephews and nieces? Is this the kind of language you use at home? You are pathetic and should grow up!

  reply
• CHE ANDREW 12 years ago

  I believe by now you mouth would have developed big blisters due to your persistent insults. Close your mouth and use you brains to answer these questions.
  1. Do the respondents have in their possession 24 boxes or 31 boxes? ...
  read full comment

  I believe by now you mouth would have developed big blisters due to your persistent insults. Close your mouth and use you brains to answer these questions.
  1. Do the respondents have in their possession 24 boxes or 31 boxes?
  2. Do the Justices have 24 boxes or 31 boxes?
  3. Do the 3 respondents have in the possession the 11,000+ "pig-shit" as claimed by the NPP or are they less than that?
  4. Do the 9 Justices have the 11,000+ "pig-shits" as claimed by the NPP or are they less?
  In the matter before the SC numbers and indeed, correct numbers are the crux of the matter. Next is credibility based on honesty. Do you remember Lawyer Addison telling the court that the respondents ought to have asked for the shortfall if there was any? If you were a respondent to the case will you not sing Haleluyah! if the petitioners make such a mess of themselves?

  reply
• Sankofa 12 years ago

  Why are KPMG proceeding with the audit without resolving the issue of the extra ballot boxes?

  Why are KPMG proceeding with the audit without resolving the issue of the extra ballot boxes?

  reply
• Theo 12 years ago

  What extra ballot boxes? The only people who are seeing extra ballot boxes are ndc who "counted the boxes and kept the number in their heads"
  
  My friend, there is no extra boxes from anywhere unless you are a fool to believ ...
  read full comment

  What extra ballot boxes? The only people who are seeing extra ballot boxes are ndc who "counted the boxes and kept the number in their heads"
  
  My friend, there is no extra boxes from anywhere unless you are a fool to believe ndc nonsense.

  reply
• MAHAMA 12 years ago

  IS LYING SOMETHING THEY TEACH AT NDC UNIVERSITY FOR TROKOSI BIGOTRY? READ WHAT AMALIYA SAID COMPARED TO WHAT KPMG AND THE PETITIONERS LAWYERS SAID ABOUT THE NUMBER OF BOXES. THEY ALL SAID THEY DID NOT COUNT THE BOXES SO WHERE ...
  read full comment

  IS LYING SOMETHING THEY TEACH AT NDC UNIVERSITY FOR TROKOSI BIGOTRY? READ WHAT AMALIYA SAID COMPARED TO WHAT KPMG AND THE PETITIONERS LAWYERS SAID ABOUT THE NUMBER OF BOXES. THEY ALL SAID THEY DID NOT COUNT THE BOXES SO WHERE DID AMALIBA COME BY THIS LIE HE TOLD A RADIO STATION.
  
  "Lawyer Abraham Amaliba, a member of the legal team of the ruling National Democratic Congress (NDC), prefers the head count of the number of boxes of pink sheets at the Supreme Court Registry to be done in an open court.
  
  According to him, his side deems the process “compromised” and so, will not go along with it unless the process is displayed in the full glare of the court.
  
  Speaking to Radio Gold, Lawyer Amaliba explained the circumstances that led to the increased number of the boxes containing the pink sheets.
  
  He narrated that last Thursday, representatives from all the parties involved in the election case took inventory of the boxes and was aware of the number until Monday when they realized some changes. "

  reply
• All Die Be Die 12 years ago

  If there are extra boxes then the registrar must be held responsible. I very much doubt increasing the boxes would be a beneficial move by NDC elements as the increase will be to the benefit of NPP. This common logic that som ...
  read full comment

  If there are extra boxes then the registrar must be held responsible. I very much doubt increasing the boxes would be a beneficial move by NDC elements as the increase will be to the benefit of NPP. This common logic that something is foul about the so called concrete evidence loudly sang by the losers of the last elections. One does not need basic lessons in logic to reason through this development no matter how biased and fanatical a party supporter can be.Any way, dear divided fellow Ghanaians if only we all could pay just 20% of the unrelenting allegiance we pay to various parties to our dear country, I bet we will go places as a nation. There are very committed NPPians and very committed NDCians but simply poorly committed Ghanaians with regard to our collective belonging!

  reply
• DAN 12 years ago

  Why does a man take a low paying job for gov...except to steal and be bribes by companies and lobbiest!

  Why does a man take a low paying job for gov...except to steal and be bribes by companies and lobbiest!

  reply
• CHE ANDREW 12 years ago

  My dear compatriot, you have said it all. Supporters of these two parties are willing to die for their respective parties but not for the nation. This because their greedy desires can only be met at the expense of all of us o ...
  read full comment

  My dear compatriot, you have said it all. Supporters of these two parties are willing to die for their respective parties but not for the nation. This because their greedy desires can only be met at the expense of all of us only when their respective parties are in power. No wonder that they call themselves "Fool soldiers".

  reply
• DAN 12 years ago

  go back to street and let the men have their way with you for 1 pesawa or 3 men(all holes used at same time) for 1 cedi

  go back to street and let the men have their way with you for 1 pesawa or 3 men(all holes used at same time) for 1 cedi

  reply
• princewilly@ymail.com 12 years ago

  A middle-aged couple had two beautiful daughters but always talked about having a son.
  They decided to try one last time for the son they always wanted.
  The wife got pregnant and delivered a healthy baby boy.
  The joyful fa ...
  read full comment

  A middle-aged couple had two beautiful daughters but always talked about having a son.
  They decided to try one last time for the son they always wanted.
  The wife got pregnant and delivered a healthy baby boy.
  The joyful father rushed to the nursery to see his new son.
  He was horrified at the ugliest child he had ever seen.
  He told his wife: "There's no way I can be the father of this baby. Look at the two beautiful daughters I fathered! Have you been fooling around behind my back?"
  The wife smiled sweetly and replied, "Not this time!

  reply
• ADELE PALMAS 12 years ago

  MARGERET JACKSON YOU ARE TOO FORWARD:NO
  WONDER YOU ARE ASHAWO:YOUR FORWARDNESS IS THE CHARACTERISTICS OF 33-11=22.YOU
  Hate NPP BECAUSE SIR JOHN DID NOT GIVE IN
  TO YOU .SHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAME.SIR JOHN WIL
  NOT LIKE YOU TODAY ...
  read full comment

  MARGERET JACKSON YOU ARE TOO FORWARD:NO
  WONDER YOU ARE ASHAWO:YOUR FORWARDNESS IS THE CHARACTERISTICS OF 33-11=22.YOU
  Hate NPP BECAUSE SIR JOHN DID NOT GIVE IN
  TO YOU .SHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAME.SIR JOHN WIL
  NOT LIKE YOU TODAY OR TOMORROW.

  reply
• CHE ANDREW 12 years ago

  Did you not hear that Sir John's wife had to seek a court order that has compelled him to cover his face anytime he has to perform his natural paternal dues with his wife? That man is so ugly his wife loses sexual feelings an ...
  read full comment

  Did you not hear that Sir John's wife had to seek a court order that has compelled him to cover his face anytime he has to perform his natural paternal dues with his wife? That man is so ugly his wife loses sexual feelings anytime he undresses and gets into bed. She is now in court asking that Sir John uses special Arabian perfume before going to bed because he smells so terribly.

  reply
• Fantassy 12 years ago

  We already know that this covering of face only occurs in TROKOLAND and not Ghana since this is rape related.

  We already know that this covering of face only occurs in TROKOLAND and not Ghana since this is rape related.

  reply
• Paul Amuna 12 years ago

  Margaret, I have often valued your articles ( though not necessarily supporting your position) despite your clear NDC-partisan leanings and views. Here is one article in which I fundamentally disagree with your take and insin ...
  read full comment

  Margaret, I have often valued your articles ( though not necessarily supporting your position) despite your clear NDC-partisan leanings and views. Here is one article in which I fundamentally disagree with your take and insinuation.
  
  If there was a proper audit at the beginning with all parties in attendance, then surely KPMG have all the records and should be able to tell us if anything has changed.
  
  I am not all clear about the NDC respondents' aim or agenda here. Yes, we know in the past exhibits have gone AWOL from court and you may argue then that you don't want a repeat but I seriously doubt if any such "fast one" could have been pulled in this case.
  
  I therefore disagree with your views and assertions and would rather that (as directed by the supreme court justices) the NDC make their formal complaint to KPMG the referee in this case, which I am sure they have already done. It is unhelpful and frankly counter-productive for anyone to continue to be-labour the point.
  
  I also think it is foolish and irresponsible and disrespectful of the court for the respondents (or their surrogates) to be calling for the audit of the pink sheets to be "in open court"! This is not a lawn tennis match you know? You debase what we all know to be a very serious and landmark case.
  
  Why not let all of us simply wait and see what happens? By the way, there is so much else to do and for the court to focus on and instead of revisiting this particular issue, give us a break and let's move on with other matters such as examination / cross-examination of the witnesses for the respondents. Would you agree?

  reply