Dr. Bawumia was a joke and a worse withness. Mr Asiedu Nketia did an excellent job. That is why Nana is yelling at the NPP attorney. They have made a fool of themselves. I suggest all NPP supporters should let nana, osafo man ... read full comment
Dr. Bawumia was a joke and a worse withness. Mr Asiedu Nketia did an excellent job. That is why Nana is yelling at the NPP attorney. They have made a fool of themselves. I suggest all NPP supporters should let nana, osafo manfo, Ken offia-atta, obeshibi-lamptey and Dr. Bawumia to retire and lets get new leadership for NPP.
JOEMOORE 10 years ago
May i ask that did dr. bawumia also participated in biometrics election before or did mr.Addison also participated in biomertric election before? i think mr. addison cut short his cross-examination because he did not have eno ... read full comment
May i ask that did dr. bawumia also participated in biometrics election before or did mr.Addison also participated in biomertric election before? i think mr. addison cut short his cross-examination because he did not have enouth questions.
the writter is trying to mislead the readers. i heard that mr. addison played interview grant by mr.asiedu to prove that he Asiedu said that anybody VOTE WITHOUT VERIFICATION that vote must be cancel. but my question to this is that, is a Ghanaian election law made in radio station? if not then i think anything some body said in the radio station would only be his/her opinion so one cannot said that you said it in the interview so it should be the law or the nation should act on it.
and also NO VERIFICAFICATION NO VOTE means alot.please dont confused us. i think the same law said that anyone that qualifies shall not denie to vote,this means to me that if the biometric machine broke down and the voter have VOTERS ID this person have every right to vote or this person shall not deniel to vote.
that is my understanding of this noverification no vote.
the don 10 years ago
uncle Kofi Ata, take a good look at yourself and you will sure see what is wrong with Ghana. you write brilliantly but in circles. this reality and not a hypothetical prose. God dammn it be decisive MANNNNNNNN
uncle Kofi Ata, take a good look at yourself and you will sure see what is wrong with Ghana. you write brilliantly but in circles. this reality and not a hypothetical prose. God dammn it be decisive MANNNNNNNN
princewilly@ymail.com 10 years ago
A "dread" was living in rural Jamaica in a community that had no electricity supply. One evening he was reading his Bible (Macabee version) and meditating, assisted by lighting from a bedside lamp (Home Sweet Home), but was b ... read full comment
A "dread" was living in rural Jamaica in a community that had no electricity supply. One evening he was reading his Bible (Macabee version) and meditating, assisted by lighting from a bedside lamp (Home Sweet Home), but was bothered by the constant nuisance of some mosquitoes. He could bear it no longer so he decided to cover up under his sheet in bed, but it was useless as the mosquitoes kept biting him on his ears through the sheet. He got up and blew out the lamp and went back under the sheets, hoping that the mosquitoes would not be able to bother him if they could not see him.
The Mosquitoes did not bite him for a few minutes giving the "dread" hope that his so-called plan had worked out perfectly. Now he was only hearing the constant "humming' of them flying around in the room. It was getting real hot under the sheets, so the "dread" decided that he would take off the sheet as it was too dark for the mosquitoes to see him now. When he removed the sheets, lay on his back and looked up in the ceiling, he saw a 'peenie wallie' (Firefly) flying around. The "dread" shouted out "BlOOD CLAATT!! DEM CUM BACK WID FLASHLIGHT FI I AND I!!"
ASEIDU NKETIA HAS COME TO BITE THE PETITIONERS WHO ARE NOT CARRYING LAMP BUT ELECTRICITY BY SAYING CHOOBO,CHOOBOI,DUMSOR,DUMSOR.
THE MORE THEY PUT THE LIGHT OFF THE MORE THEY GET THE BITE.
Wiafe 10 years ago
Its too bad we are stuck with these too bogus parties. The two parties are just vampires seeking to suck out our resources for their selfish ends.
The performance of both parties at the SC shows how shallow and reckless th ... read full comment
Its too bad we are stuck with these too bogus parties. The two parties are just vampires seeking to suck out our resources for their selfish ends.
The performance of both parties at the SC shows how shallow and reckless they parties are.
Its sad that Ghanaians are stuck with these jokers. A country of over 25 million and we only have Mahama and Akuffo (2 incompetents)to chose for president. It is sad.
Kwadwo 10 years ago
Why do you keep writing these half truths in a vain attempt to be objective. Keep these opinions to yourself. Some of us instead of "representing employees at tribunals" actually try major civil cases and understand what is ... read full comment
Why do you keep writing these half truths in a vain attempt to be objective. Keep these opinions to yourself. Some of us instead of "representing employees at tribunals" actually try major civil cases and understand what is going on in the Supreme Court. You are no different from the serial callers on Adom Fm.
Kofi Ata, Cambridge, UK 10 years ago
Kwadwo, are you commenting on this article or yesterday's? The Employment Tribunal example I gave was not to boast but just to show that even in the lowest end of the judiciary here there is respect for all parties, including ... read full comment
Kwadwo, are you commenting on this article or yesterday's? The Employment Tribunal example I gave was not to boast but just to show that even in the lowest end of the judiciary here there is respect for all parties, including a Barrister and QC showing me who is not a lawyer full respect. It was just an illustration and I am fully aware that there are Ghanaians in the UK who are Barristers and go to higher courts (High and Appeal) on major civil and criminal cases.
You have every right to disagree with my assessment but attempting to belittle others is uncalled for. In any case, where in this article did I give the Employment Tribunal example? Are you not exhibiting here that you were prejudiced even before you read the article if you are using example in a previous article to judge this one?
Chabba 10 years ago
I did not listen to the totality of his evidence, so this is based on what I listened to----Ata Kofi.
Atari Kofi if you did not listen to "the totality" of the evidence of Asiedu Nketia, then how do you make an objective and ... read full comment
I did not listen to the totality of his evidence, so this is based on what I listened to----Ata Kofi.
Atari Kofi if you did not listen to "the totality" of the evidence of Asiedu Nketia, then how do you make an objective and fair assessment of his witness and even going to the extent of comparing it to that of Dr. Bawumia? You see, people like you, the NDC and John Mahama are the very reason why Ghana is sinking so fast into political and economic abyss due to your dishonesty, lies and deception. Probably you think people cannot see through your subtle deceptive articles trying to show 'objectivity' which in actual fact you are bent on putting the petitioners in a bad light. The justice of God grinds slowly but it grinds exceedingly fine! So keep on with dishonesty!
Dr Yaw Ohemeng 10 years ago
Kofi Atta you try so much to be objective, but you fail anytime you make the attempt. Mosquito - honorary professor in pink sheets? Please come again. The man was a bundle of contradictions!
1. He declared that he was not ... read full comment
Kofi Atta you try so much to be objective, but you fail anytime you make the attempt. Mosquito - honorary professor in pink sheets? Please come again. The man was a bundle of contradictions!
1. He declared that he was not a Lawyer and therefore did not know of Constitutional provisions guiding elections. In the next breadth, he was defining over-voting and tying it to the Constitutional requirement that everyone does have a vote;
2. He was claiming the existence of unidentified material if votes cast exceed votes issued. Yet he thought all other parts of the pink sheet were immaterial, except the declaration of results portion. How was one then to detect that there are unidentified material?
3. He agreed that polling agents cannot direct presiding officers what to do, yet thought that their signing of pink sheets certifies the results;
4. He said in his experience ballot accounting is only done after declaration of results because there is always pressure for counting to begin. This Dr Afari Gyan testified would amount to an irregularity;
5. He thought no reliance should be placed on number of voters, as recorded on the pink sheet. So how was over-voting, as he defined it, to be detected?
6. He claimed that no one voted without biometric verification and yet confirmed that they did receive pink sheets from stations where results were annulled for voting without verification.
I can go on and on but I think I will reserve it for a planned article.
Asiedu Nketia rather exposed his lack of understanding of what the various portions of the pink sheet are there to verify. From now on, elections will never be the same - people will pay attention to how these things are done. From reports, care was taken to fill in all sections, at the required point and checks done before the recent bye-election in the north was declared. The petition, I say, is already yielding the required dividends.
Kakraba Cromwell 10 years ago
Dear Dr Ohemeng,
I completely disagree with you that kofi ata's analysis is skewed.
The case is for the petitioners to prove their case.
Bawumia did a very bad job in the witness box.
I am Npp but I am completely disappoi ... read full comment
Dear Dr Ohemeng,
I completely disagree with you that kofi ata's analysis is skewed.
The case is for the petitioners to prove their case.
Bawumia did a very bad job in the witness box.
I am Npp but I am completely disappointed and disillusioned by the testimony of Bawumia.
What i expected Addison to do was to completely destroy and make the "general" a bogus witnes, but he failed miserably!
Kofi Ata, Cambridge, UK 10 years ago
Dr Ohemeng, the only difference between us is that I did not provide the various examples of Asiedu Nketia's contradictions as you have but I stated in the article that he contradicted himself both during his evidence-in-chie ... read full comment
Dr Ohemeng, the only difference between us is that I did not provide the various examples of Asiedu Nketia's contradictions as you have but I stated in the article that he contradicted himself both during his evidence-in-chief and under cross examination. To avoid a very long article I did not provide specific examples as you have.
Again, I am still of the view that his knowledge on electoral matters including pink sheet was better than Dr Bawumia and therefore if he was given the accolade "Dr Pink Sheet" then Asiedu Nketia could be given professor but after hearing from Dr Afrai Gyan, Asiedu Nketia also does not deserve a full doctorate but only an honorary one. Or was it my suggestion that the Dr Pink Sheet should be withdrawn from Dr Bawumia that was skewed? Dr Wereko Brobbey is right that Dr Bawumia should not have been the key witness but someone who involved with all the meetings with the EC about the processes and procedures such as Sir John and Jake.
Despite, your conclusion that my analysis is skewed, you failed to indicate which section/s are skewed but only provided examples of Asiedu Nketia's contradictions, which is stated in the article. Is the analysis skewed just because I did not give examples of what I meant by his contradictions?
Let's make debate on this forum more useful by offering alternatives instead of always being judgemental. I do not expect readers to agree to my views but predetermined accusations of bias will not lead to any improvement.
Dr Yaw Ohemeng 10 years ago
The reason why I labelled your article skewed is based on what was being analysed. The petitioners have made certain allegations, which the pink sheet clearly shows. The matter before the justices is not about electoral proce ... read full comment
The reason why I labelled your article skewed is based on what was being analysed. The petitioners have made certain allegations, which the pink sheet clearly shows. The matter before the justices is not about electoral process but what took place, based on the only 'concrete' evidence available. I expected that if you have bothered to analyse what is happening, then it should be about the substance of the case and should also compare and contrast why the two witnesses were selected by the two parties.
Dr Bawumia was selected based on the fact that he carried out the analysis of the alleged infractions. On that, no one has managed to challenge him. Asiedu Nketia, on this core issue, was not even within sight of Bawumia.
I felt that this distinction ought to have been done in your article. On the issues to be determined by the court, Bawumia presented an excellent case.
Asiedu Nketia was in the dock because of his claim to 34 years of experience in election matters. He asserted several times that figures on the face on the pink sheet were errors and his justification was that processes existed to prevent those errors. He could not explain why, in spite of these processes, those errors occurred. If he knows the nitty-gritty of elections, he knew the flawed ways and not what ought to have occurred. Even if he was well-versed in the nitty gritty, in what way did he demonstrate how the errors arose. That is why I would not credit him with the knowledge you assigned him.
I thought I should say this to those expressing surprise that Sir John was not among the petitioners. Are you implying he was, somehow, not consulted in putting the case together? He certainly was but since the main issue is a statistical/mathematical one, who is best placed to present it?
Kofi Ata, Cambridge, UK 10 years ago
Dr Ohemeng, I will give you the benefit of the doubt that, perhaps, you misinterpreted the objective of the article. The article was not about the substance of the petitioners' case or claim, rather, an assessment of how the ... read full comment
Dr Ohemeng, I will give you the benefit of the doubt that, perhaps, you misinterpreted the objective of the article. The article was not about the substance of the petitioners' case or claim, rather, an assessment of how the witness performed in the witness box. Probably, that I am right that some people read articles with a predetermined mind on what it should contain or should not contain.
The substance of the case is for the Justices to determine and not me, though I can discuss it and indeed, I have done so in some of my articles since the elections.
As explained above, I did not set out to discuss substance of the case and that is why I did not analyse the alleged irregularities, errors or mistakes on the pink sheets. I am also waiting to hear how Dr Afari Gyan will explain all those irregularities, errors or mistakes on the pink sheets but that was not the purpose of this article.
I am surprised you concluded from my suggestion that Sir John or Jake should have been a key witness instead of Dr Bawumia meant I am suggesting he was not consulted. That really is neither here nor there. It was only a suggestion and my view. Of course, they were in a better position to make that decision than me. Again, making Sir John or Jake the key witness should not have excluded Dr Bawumia from the witness box.
Rii. 10 years ago
You are jumping around, Sir. We got you loud and clear. You are enthralled by the performance of the man called "Mosquito". That is not a surprise, because in this lawsuit, there are those who accept the status quo however it ... read full comment
You are jumping around, Sir. We got you loud and clear. You are enthralled by the performance of the man called "Mosquito". That is not a surprise, because in this lawsuit, there are those who accept the status quo however it was achieved, and those who can cut through all the shenanigans and the fanfare surrounding the case. Dr Ohemeng's riposte is taken from a select view which is a cut above the norm. If you do not get it, you just won't.
Yaw Amofa 10 years ago
Addison was pathethic as a counsel in his cross examinations, and i am still baffled why NPP which has 85% of Ghanaian lawyers in its fold, will chose such and inexeperienced lawyer to lead them. He was no match for Gen Mosqu ... read full comment
Addison was pathethic as a counsel in his cross examinations, and i am still baffled why NPP which has 85% of Ghanaian lawyers in its fold, will chose such and inexeperienced lawyer to lead them. He was no match for Gen Mosquito.
Kakraba Cromwell 10 years ago
Dr Ohemeng,
I completely disagree with you that kofi ata's analysis is skewed.
The case is for the petitioners to prove their case.
Bawumia did a very bad job in the witness box.
I am Npp but I am completely disappointed ... read full comment
Dr Ohemeng,
I completely disagree with you that kofi ata's analysis is skewed.
The case is for the petitioners to prove their case.
Bawumia did a very bad job in the witness box.
I am Npp but I am completely disappointed and disillusioned by the testimony of Bawumia.
What i expected Addison to do was to completely destroy and make the "general" a bogus witnes, but he failed miserably!
Paul Amuna 10 years ago
Kofi, I am sorry to say that this is perhaps your worst analysis of this case so far, and falls far short of your usual high standards.
In your attempt to 'remain neutral' of avoid being accused by either side, you have su ... read full comment
Kofi, I am sorry to say that this is perhaps your worst analysis of this case so far, and falls far short of your usual high standards.
In your attempt to 'remain neutral' of avoid being accused by either side, you have succeeded in provided an intellectually weak and factually limiting analysis of the real facts. You could have picked on key moments in examination and cross examination and been more critical of both sides.
You should also call a spade a spade when you see one. Honestly, Nketiah gave a far better account for himself and Bawumiah's was a very poor showing. I cannot see how close a comparison you can give to the two witnesses, one of whom was clearly a pathological liar and constantly evasive. I am inclined to support Dr Wireko-Brobbey's comparison than yours, and you can see why the NPP apparatchiks want him out of their party (for telling it as it is between these two witnesses).
One who (whether coached by counsel or not) had determined that he would NEVER provide a straight and clear answer to any question, and another witness who was armed with the facts and (yes, may occasionally have been sarcastic) but was determined to let counsel for the petition know that he wouldn't be intimidated, and that he wouldn't stand for any tricks.
Is it too had to simply report it as is, just because you don't want to be condemned? Disappointing my friend,
Kofi Ata, Cambridge, UK 10 years ago
Paul, you do not have to be sorry to disagree with my views or if I fell below (your) expectation/s. First, my objective/s for posting articles is not only to share my views but more important, to open such views to objective ... read full comment
Paul, you do not have to be sorry to disagree with my views or if I fell below (your) expectation/s. First, my objective/s for posting articles is not only to share my views but more important, to open such views to objective discussions/debate/s and critique. It is also to solicit alternative views as contribution to development in the motherland. Again, my intention is not to condemn, glorify or sing praises a persons, groups or parties, though on some occasions, I have condemned certain actions.
The words being used by all of us such as being objective or not, anti or pro NDC/NPP, etc are all subjective. That is, they are subject to interpretations and therefore what is objective to me may not necessarily be objective to others, particularly, in a divided country such as Ghana and in matters involving the two political divides. Moreover, as humans we have our preferences and by our nature we are bias in one way or the other. Though I operate in equality and human rights, the only true equality that exist is time and the value placed on the value a vote cast at elections in a 'democracy'. In other words, I do not pretend to be whiter than white when it comes to being objective because I am human and therefore no matter how best my objectivity may be, it will fall below the standards of others. Again, once readers are aware of where one's sympathy lies, there is the risk of being judged in the prism of that line or on that basis than the content of the article. I am saying so because a number of readers assumed I was a saint, totally neutral and did not have a position on the two political divides. Once I confirmed in a number of articles and responses to comments, I became Lucifer since in their minds I am pro NDC.
I welcome constructive criticism but the one dimensional assessment of my objectivity or not being clouded by my sympathy towards NDC or being anti NPP is in itself part of the problem. I may use words like being economical with the truth instead of a liar. If that style betrays my objectivity then, that is fine with me. If the majority view out there is that Asiedu Nketia was not evasive or contradictory in the witness box, that is also fine with me. However, I have the right to express a different view in the same way that all the others have the right to hold onto what in my view, may be alien to me. I am sure we can disagree to agree, so I appreciate your comment.
Okonko Palm 10 years ago
In your attempt to be seen to be objective, you some times end up in a muddle.If it had not been obvious to you that the two personalities were coming from a divergent moral angle,then you must be living in a cloud cuckold la ... read full comment
In your attempt to be seen to be objective, you some times end up in a muddle.If it had not been obvious to you that the two personalities were coming from a divergent moral angle,then you must be living in a cloud cuckold land.
Whereas Asiedu had truth as his shield in the witness box,Bawumiah's evidence was a tangled mishmash of words and figure juggling to confuse and perhaps in his infantile and juvenile mind to outwit all.Credibility is established not by avoiding answers,but how truthful you are. Addison was asking double edged questions to confuse Asiedu and sometimes the questions were not clear so Asiedu had the right to ask for explanation.That is what a good witness must do to ensure that he understood the the question before answering.To assume that Asiedu was hiding something and contradicting himself is not only unfair especially with your experience at the courts and tribunals.I have no doubt that Asiedu was truthful all along to the best of his knowledge as compared to bawumiah who took a gamble on a fishing expedition hoping to make a haul.
Nana 10 years ago
You are misleading the people and you should stop those propaganda.It will serve you well if you do publish the truth!
You are misleading the people and you should stop those propaganda.It will serve you well if you do publish the truth!
KOO NIMO, USA 10 years ago
I think Kofi Atah's problem is his past association with the PNDC and therefore the perceived view that his sympathies lie with the NDC. As a intellectual he has found it difficult to shirk this pereception and therefore tri ... read full comment
I think Kofi Atah's problem is his past association with the PNDC and therefore the perceived view that his sympathies lie with the NDC. As a intellectual he has found it difficult to shirk this pereception and therefore tries too hard to be "objective". Kofi succeeds at times but sometimes one gets the impression that he is more concerned with not letting readers place him in either of the strong partisan camps in Ghana. When he is hard on the NDC, he is brutal, but he measures his words carefully when dealing with the NPP, because of his known past association with the PNDC(stated above) which he has honestly admitted to.
I enjoy and always look forward to reading his articles. I however read Kofi's articles with this in mind: in the hyper-partisan environment in the Ghanaian society and especially in the media especially, Kofi Ata has tried to be as non-partisan as possible, even if he comes across at times as "trying to hard" and perhaps "wishy-washy". So please "ALLOW" as we used to say on (University) campuses in Ghana.
kb 10 years ago
am really surprised at your analysis that you did not realise that asiedu nketia was on the lay man's track. if you are sincere bawumia had interpreted the questions on the pink sheets. You know Afari gyan lied by saying that ... read full comment
am really surprised at your analysis that you did not realise that asiedu nketia was on the lay man's track. if you are sincere bawumia had interpreted the questions on the pink sheets. You know Afari gyan lied by saying that the EC officials were not authorised to fill those portions on the pink sheets. if so why were the questions there and what kind of training did he give to the officers and why? please do a fair analysis. we want a clear and fair elections with every question on the pink or blue sheets anaswered.
Efo Kwaku 10 years ago
This is your opinion and opinion are like noises but Mr mosquito met raid and other repellents and run away without bitten
This is your opinion and opinion are like noises but Mr mosquito met raid and other repellents and run away without bitten
Dr. Bawumia was a joke and a worse withness. Mr Asiedu Nketia did an excellent job. That is why Nana is yelling at the NPP attorney. They have made a fool of themselves. I suggest all NPP supporters should let nana, osafo man ...
read full comment
May i ask that did dr. bawumia also participated in biometrics election before or did mr.Addison also participated in biomertric election before? i think mr. addison cut short his cross-examination because he did not have eno ...
read full comment
uncle Kofi Ata, take a good look at yourself and you will sure see what is wrong with Ghana. you write brilliantly but in circles. this reality and not a hypothetical prose. God dammn it be decisive MANNNNNNNN
A "dread" was living in rural Jamaica in a community that had no electricity supply. One evening he was reading his Bible (Macabee version) and meditating, assisted by lighting from a bedside lamp (Home Sweet Home), but was b ...
read full comment
Its too bad we are stuck with these too bogus parties. The two parties are just vampires seeking to suck out our resources for their selfish ends.
The performance of both parties at the SC shows how shallow and reckless th ...
read full comment
Why do you keep writing these half truths in a vain attempt to be objective. Keep these opinions to yourself. Some of us instead of "representing employees at tribunals" actually try major civil cases and understand what is ...
read full comment
Kwadwo, are you commenting on this article or yesterday's? The Employment Tribunal example I gave was not to boast but just to show that even in the lowest end of the judiciary here there is respect for all parties, including ...
read full comment
I did not listen to the totality of his evidence, so this is based on what I listened to----Ata Kofi.
Atari Kofi if you did not listen to "the totality" of the evidence of Asiedu Nketia, then how do you make an objective and ...
read full comment
Kofi Atta you try so much to be objective, but you fail anytime you make the attempt. Mosquito - honorary professor in pink sheets? Please come again. The man was a bundle of contradictions!
1. He declared that he was not ...
read full comment
Dear Dr Ohemeng,
I completely disagree with you that kofi ata's analysis is skewed.
The case is for the petitioners to prove their case.
Bawumia did a very bad job in the witness box.
I am Npp but I am completely disappoi ...
read full comment
Dr Ohemeng, the only difference between us is that I did not provide the various examples of Asiedu Nketia's contradictions as you have but I stated in the article that he contradicted himself both during his evidence-in-chie ...
read full comment
The reason why I labelled your article skewed is based on what was being analysed. The petitioners have made certain allegations, which the pink sheet clearly shows. The matter before the justices is not about electoral proce ...
read full comment
Dr Ohemeng, I will give you the benefit of the doubt that, perhaps, you misinterpreted the objective of the article. The article was not about the substance of the petitioners' case or claim, rather, an assessment of how the ...
read full comment
You are jumping around, Sir. We got you loud and clear. You are enthralled by the performance of the man called "Mosquito". That is not a surprise, because in this lawsuit, there are those who accept the status quo however it ...
read full comment
Addison was pathethic as a counsel in his cross examinations, and i am still baffled why NPP which has 85% of Ghanaian lawyers in its fold, will chose such and inexeperienced lawyer to lead them. He was no match for Gen Mosqu ...
read full comment
Dr Ohemeng,
I completely disagree with you that kofi ata's analysis is skewed.
The case is for the petitioners to prove their case.
Bawumia did a very bad job in the witness box.
I am Npp but I am completely disappointed ...
read full comment
Kofi, I am sorry to say that this is perhaps your worst analysis of this case so far, and falls far short of your usual high standards.
In your attempt to 'remain neutral' of avoid being accused by either side, you have su ...
read full comment
Paul, you do not have to be sorry to disagree with my views or if I fell below (your) expectation/s. First, my objective/s for posting articles is not only to share my views but more important, to open such views to objective ...
read full comment
In your attempt to be seen to be objective, you some times end up in a muddle.If it had not been obvious to you that the two personalities were coming from a divergent moral angle,then you must be living in a cloud cuckold la ...
read full comment
You are misleading the people and you should stop those propaganda.It will serve you well if you do publish the truth!
I think Kofi Atah's problem is his past association with the PNDC and therefore the perceived view that his sympathies lie with the NDC. As a intellectual he has found it difficult to shirk this pereception and therefore tri ...
read full comment
am really surprised at your analysis that you did not realise that asiedu nketia was on the lay man's track. if you are sincere bawumia had interpreted the questions on the pink sheets. You know Afari gyan lied by saying that ...
read full comment
This is your opinion and opinion are like noises but Mr mosquito met raid and other repellents and run away without bitten