Is Addison Perverting the Course of Justice?

Read Article

Comments (46)

This article is closed for comments.

Read Comments Comments (46)

Mohammed Dimbie 12 years ago

You couldn't have said it better, especially as you stated the reality in your last paragraph!!

You couldn't have said it better, especially as you stated the reality in your last paragraph!!
KOLA ,LONDON PROPER 12 years ago

BOMDED AND CHOKED

The fool is telling you to do your home work to find the 'difference b/n Devaluation and Depreciation of money as you BOMDED AND CHOKED on the two...hahahahaha

BOMDED AND CHOKED

The fool is telling you to do your home work to find the 'difference b/n Devaluation and Depreciation of money as you BOMDED AND CHOKED on the two...hahahahaha
DAN 12 years ago

Hahahahahahahahaha, this is funny, bomded. Is that a new English word?

Hahahahahahahahaha, this is funny, bomded. Is that a new English word?
APONKYI SARPONG 12 years ago

You always try not be bias in writing your articles. Concentrate on Addison and leave the First and second respondent's attitude in court.

You always try not be bias in writing your articles. Concentrate on Addison and leave the First and second respondent's attitude in court.
GTV-TV3 on WWW.OFMTV.COM 12 years ago

Watch GTV & TV3 on WWW.OFMTV.COM

Watch GTV & TV3 on WWW.OFMTV.COM
GTV-TV3 on WWW.OFMTV.COM 12 years ago

Watch every show or NEWS LIVE FROM GHANA ON TV3,FIFA SPORTS, UNDER 20 FIFA WORLD CUP,
TV AFRICA, GTV, ADOM TV AND OVER 7500 TV - RADIO
CHANNELS FREE ONLINE AT WWW.OFMTV.COM

Watch every show or NEWS LIVE FROM GHANA ON TV3,FIFA SPORTS, UNDER 20 FIFA WORLD CUP,
TV AFRICA, GTV, ADOM TV AND OVER 7500 TV - RADIO
CHANNELS FREE ONLINE AT WWW.OFMTV.COM
GTV-TV3 on WWW.OFMTV.COM 12 years ago

NEWS LIVE FROM GHANA ON TV3,FIFA SPORTS, UNDER 20 FIFA WORLD CUP,
TV AFRICA, GTV, ADOM TV AND OVER 7500 TV - RADIO
CHANNELS FREE ONLINE AT WWW.OFMTV.COM

NEWS LIVE FROM GHANA ON TV3,FIFA SPORTS, UNDER 20 FIFA WORLD CUP,
TV AFRICA, GTV, ADOM TV AND OVER 7500 TV - RADIO
CHANNELS FREE ONLINE AT WWW.OFMTV.COM
PAA 12 years ago

Npp will soon die and a new party formed in its place. What npp are looking for is to come to power to loot the nation's resources. Npp thinks Ghanaians have soon forgotten when they were stealing gold, money, land and other ...
read full comment

Npp will soon die and a new party formed in its place. What npp are looking for is to come to power to loot the nation's resources. Npp thinks Ghanaians have soon forgotten when they were stealing gold, money, land and other state properties. Ministers saving government loans in their individual foreign accounts and keeping the interest accrued before releasing the capital to nation's coffers. In fact, the SC is really wasting time that is why these crooks think they still stand a chance. Where on earth have you seen SC removing democratically elected president and putting in a 70 years old drug baron, greedy and arrogant man as president? You have been found out and God will punish you for wasting Ghanaian tax-payers money.
prince 12 years ago

Kofi is right. he is afraid of stealers like Addison. That document was actually fake!!!!!!! Must win by all means is same as All die be die!!!!

Kofi is right. he is afraid of stealers like Addison. That document was actually fake!!!!!!! Must win by all means is same as All die be die!!!!
APONKYI SARPONG 12 years ago

Kola Used them in inverted commas. No big deal Aponkye Sarp.

Kola Used them in inverted commas. No big deal Aponkye Sarp.

DAN 12 years ago

What difference does it make if you did? Explain why you put them in inverted commas.

What difference does it make if you did? Explain why you put them in inverted commas.
prince 12 years ago

Dan I agree. Whichever way he did, makes no sense and totally out of context!!!

Dan I agree. Whichever way he did, makes no sense and totally out of context!!!
APONKYI SARPONG 12 years ago

Author: KOLA ,LONDON PROPER
Date: 2013-07-13 17:03:33
Comment to: ILLITERATE CHILDRENS IS A GROUP OF CHILD

The fool is telling you to do your home work to find the 'difference b/n Devaluation and Depreciation of money ...
read full comment

Author: KOLA ,LONDON PROPER
Date: 2013-07-13 17:03:33
Comment to: ILLITERATE CHILDRENS IS A GROUP OF CHILD

The fool is telling you to do your home work to find the 'difference b/n Devaluation and Depreciation of money as you 'BOMDED' AND CHOKED' on the two...hahahahaha
KOLA ,LONDON PROPER 12 years ago

Where did you schooled that you don't understand English? Do you live in a shark and trying to use this as escapegoat.? You don't even know that a group of children is childrens. You are an illiterate.

Where did you schooled that you don't understand English? Do you live in a shark and trying to use this as escapegoat.? You don't even know that a group of children is childrens. You are an illiterate.
KOO 12 years ago

Did you put WHERE DID YOU SCHOOLED in inverted commas too?

Did you put WHERE DID YOU SCHOOLED in inverted commas too?
Fo. Kwaku - Tanyingbe 12 years ago

DOES HE KNOW ABOUT THIS?

DOES HE KNOW ABOUT THIS?
Nana Yaw 12 years ago

The delay tactics is part of the 419 lawsuit hatched by Akuffo Addo and Obetsebi Lamptey to make them relevant in the NPP party and also to allow them to run again in 2016 without any internal opposition. Even if the SC rule ...
read full comment

The delay tactics is part of the 419 lawsuit hatched by Akuffo Addo and Obetsebi Lamptey to make them relevant in the NPP party and also to allow them to run again in 2016 without any internal opposition. Even if the SC rule against them, they will appeal and continue with the same delay tactics well into 2015!!!
Kwobia ( Toronto ) 12 years ago

NPP can never accept a verdict that does not go it's way.Since the "Stolen Verdict " which was crafted to appear that someone cheated them.NPP will lie to get their way.

NPP can never accept a verdict that does not go it's way.Since the "Stolen Verdict " which was crafted to appear that someone cheated them.NPP will lie to get their way.
dan 12 years ago

which was purported to have been written by akuffo addo tendered by tsikata through bawumiah which was quickly spotted by bawumiah as not authentic with a received date stamp of 3rd but was written on the 5th?? DID YOU WRITE ...
read full comment

which was purported to have been written by akuffo addo tendered by tsikata through bawumiah which was quickly spotted by bawumiah as not authentic with a received date stamp of 3rd but was written on the 5th?? DID YOU WRITE A SIMILAR PROPAGANDA ARTICLE ON GHANAWEB? NO!what is good for the goose is good for the gander. Kofi Atta be fair and balanced to all parties
Kofi Ata, Cambridge, UK 12 years ago

Dan, thank you for raising this matter. I do remember that letter but from what I heard and understood, that letter was not doctored as well as not withdrawn by Tsikata.

Bawumia confirmed that the letter was from Nana Akuf ...
read full comment

Dan, thank you for raising this matter. I do remember that letter but from what I heard and understood, that letter was not doctored as well as not withdrawn by Tsikata.

Bawumia confirmed that the letter was from Nana Akufo-Addo and the contents were accurate. However, he pointed out that the EC stamp indicating the date when it was received by the EC was earlier than the date the letter was written. That was what made him question the authenticity of the letter. That mistake was by EC or whoever stamped the letter on it arrival at the EC. That was not Tsikata attempting to present a forged letter.

Again, the Chairman of the EC, Dr Afari-Gyan confirmed the existence of the letter when he gave evidence-in-chief and under cross examination by both Tony Lithur and Tsikata.

For your information, that letter was about the allegation by the Petitioners that the EC created some polling stations that were unknown to NPP. However, the letter from Nana Akufo-Addo to EC was to inform EC of NPP's party agents for those same polling stations that the Petitioners claimed they were unaware of their existence. The letter was to discredit that claim.

Since I am bias and my articles are unfair and unbalance, why did you not write one on that, if you were convinced that Tsikata attempted to pervert the course of justice? For your information, that matter did not require any critical analysis because it was not in doubt and I did not find it necessary to write anything about something that was not in doubt. Did you hear any of the Justices raise doubt about that letter?

Broni_Akamfuo 12 years ago

Nana Addo, but an incorrect date stamp had been been placed on it whwn it was received at the EC. That clerical mistake in no way detracted from its contents. The date showing when that letter was actually written comfirms th ...
read full comment

Nana Addo, but an incorrect date stamp had been been placed on it whwn it was received at the EC. That clerical mistake in no way detracted from its contents. The date showing when that letter was actually written comfirms this fact. In any case,the letter was tendered in evidence while Addison`s 'phantom register' was not allowed to be tendered!
Please do not try to compare apples to oranges,or are you simply looking for 'equalization',which is very commonplace nowadys?
PRINCE-ISAAC SOVOR - USA 12 years ago

IF THE SC CAN JAIL THOSE WHO MADE FREE COMMENTS ON THE SAID CASE, THE I EXPECT MR ADISON AND HONORABLE BLAWUMIA TO GO TO JAIL FOR ATTEMPTING TO BLACKMAIL AND TO CONVINCE THE COURT OF THE WHOLE NATION.

IF THE SC CAN JAIL THOSE WHO MADE FREE COMMENTS ON THE SAID CASE, THE I EXPECT MR ADISON AND HONORABLE BLAWUMIA TO GO TO JAIL FOR ATTEMPTING TO BLACKMAIL AND TO CONVINCE THE COURT OF THE WHOLE NATION.
BoyBoy 12 years ago

The extract was from the EC's soft copy of the voters' registrar. The pages 5 and 6 were consistent with the soft copy given to the parties. The problem is that because the EC had dubious motives throughout the election, he w ...
read full comment

The extract was from the EC's soft copy of the voters' registrar. The pages 5 and 6 were consistent with the soft copy given to the parties. The problem is that because the EC had dubious motives throughout the election, he was constantly changing his numbers and manipulating the register. Period. NPP can prove to the court that the hard drive from EC is consistent with the extract. I hope I have cleared your doubts.
GENERAL DeGAULE 12 years ago

You have just engaged in a convoluted argument based on emotions and not facts. What Addison tried to do in court was attempt to tender documents which were patently 'DOCTORED' as an extract of a register. If his document we ...
read full comment

You have just engaged in a convoluted argument based on emotions and not facts. What Addison tried to do in court was attempt to tender documents which were patently 'DOCTORED' as an extract of a register. If his document were an extract as he purported it to be, he would not have withdrawn it. No matter how tenable one's arguments are you cannot support them with doctored documentation. Misleading the court through misrepresentation is a criminal offence.

Atuguba has really done the NPP a big favour for which they ought to be grateful. The case would have stopped at this juncture had the Judges been minded to give a decision on the respondents request for a ruling on the doctored documents. My guess is they have heard enough to adjudicate on this petition as unfounded and did not want to pile further disgrace on the petitioners and counsel.
Paul Amuna 12 years ago

you are simply an incorrigible lost soul. Burying your head int he sand when there is such a potentially serious case of fraud which is not good for our justice system is pitiful.

Perhaps this is how lawyers like Addison ...
read full comment

you are simply an incorrigible lost soul. Burying your head int he sand when there is such a potentially serious case of fraud which is not good for our justice system is pitiful.

Perhaps this is how lawyers like Addison have plied their trade and won their cases. Forget about this petition, I hope from mow on judges watching this case will scrutinise him properly in their courtroom.
LONTO-BOY 12 years ago

MASSA KOFI, this is a well written and reasonable piece. We need to remind ourselves that NPP is in court challenging EC's declaration of NDC's John Mahama as President, on the basis of allegation of fraud. Hence, NPP's must ...
read full comment

MASSA KOFI, this is a well written and reasonable piece. We need to remind ourselves that NPP is in court challenging EC's declaration of NDC's John Mahama as President, on the basis of allegation of fraud. Hence, NPP's must present compelling evidence to the Supreme Court for a realistic prospect of overturning John Mahama's victory. Ironically, Addison was perpetrating fraud upon the Supreme Court, albeit making a dramatic U-turn when he realised he was going down a slippery slope with his fictitious documents.

Potentially, Addison could have been charged with either crime of forgery, perjury or fined for professional misconduct by seeking to tender in evidence, fictitious extracts inconsistent with EC's National Register. However, for a successful charge of Addison of any criminal offense/professional misconduct, the Supreme Court has to prove those extracts were fraudulent and that he[Addison]knowingly, deliberately and intentionally produced those documents to make them admissible in a law court.

It raises a question. Why didn't the Supreme Court judges examine/verify the authenticity of the documents? And if the Supreme Court judges were bold to follow legal principles, why didn't they put Addison in the dock for tendering fabricated evidence? Or in possession of falsified documents in a court of law? Although, Addison dramatically withdrew his submission, I think both the EC and NDC lawyers missed a great opportunity to sway the SC judges on the personal integrity of Addison and credibility and veracity of NPP's evidence as a whole. Both the EC and NDC lawyers should have argued on the line that: If you fabricate evidence once, what shows that you wouldn't fabricate evidence again. Addison was simply left of the hook.
New Ekuma 12 years ago

Watch Addison's cheek , throat and head at the Supreme , hissing My lord, i withdraw my poisoned document . ADixon is just like a cobra at a circus , bewitched by an arrogant evil dwarf KAPWEPWE .

Addison 's cheek and thro ...
read full comment

Watch Addison's cheek , throat and head at the Supreme , hissing My lord, i withdraw my poisoned document . ADixon is just like a cobra at a circus , bewitched by an arrogant evil dwarf KAPWEPWE .

Addison 's cheek and throat is bigger than the head oooo tom . Addison, avoid the cameras ooo tom.
Kofi Ata, Cambridge, UK 12 years ago

My brother, fortunately or unfortunately, Mr Addison cannot be charged for perjury. The only remedy is a sanction by his professional body or the regulatory body. That is, if the Justices were prepared to report his conduct t ...
read full comment

My brother, fortunately or unfortunately, Mr Addison cannot be charged for perjury. The only remedy is a sanction by his professional body or the regulatory body. That is, if the Justices were prepared to report his conduct to the appropriate bodies. Alternatively, the Justices could punish him but that is highly unlikely. This case has thrown a lot at the Ghanaian Judiciary and it would interesting how academics write and analyse the case when it's all over.
Broni_Akamfuo 12 years ago

Contrary to what NPP die-hards like Owusu Afriyie,Kwaku Asare would have you believe,I believe Justice Atubuga sensed the looming danger for Addison and his team and cleverly diffused it by allowing him to withdraw the 'docum ...
read full comment

Contrary to what NPP die-hards like Owusu Afriyie,Kwaku Asare would have you believe,I believe Justice Atubuga sensed the looming danger for Addison and his team and cleverly diffused it by allowing him to withdraw the 'document' without the court having to make a formal ruling on the objection raised by the respondents that was anchored on authenticity.
Dotse 12 years ago

useless article. makes no sense

useless article. makes no sense

New Ekuma 12 years ago

When u see a lawyer whose cheek is bigger than the head , then a cobra is in sight . I pity the additions and addendums of adversorial Addison .watch his cheek bone and u see a gluttonous cobra . If Addison knew how his cheek ...
read full comment

When u see a lawyer whose cheek is bigger than the head , then a cobra is in sight . I pity the additions and addendums of adversorial Addison .watch his cheek bone and u see a gluttonous cobra . If Addison knew how his cheek and throat looks like on TV , he will have ended the case , take his pay and vamoose out of the sight of the TV cameras.

Poor addison ! Simply deceived and trumulized by an arrogant evil dwarf KAPWEPWE . Nonsense
PORTIA AKOTO - TOKYO 12 years ago

THE ARTICLE MAY BE UNPLESANT TO SOME PEOPLE AS BEING BAIS BUT FRANKLY SPEAKING THE ARTICLE IS VERY EDUCATIVE AND IN GOOD MANNER. I HOPE READERS MAY SHARE MY VIEWS AND WE CAN LEARN FROM IT. WE NEED PEOPLE OF THIS CALIBRE TO PR ...
read full comment

THE ARTICLE MAY BE UNPLESANT TO SOME PEOPLE AS BEING BAIS BUT FRANKLY SPEAKING THE ARTICLE IS VERY EDUCATIVE AND IN GOOD MANNER. I HOPE READERS MAY SHARE MY VIEWS AND WE CAN LEARN FROM IT. WE NEED PEOPLE OF THIS CALIBRE TO PROVIDE US SUCH GOOD ARTICLES. BRAVO. KOFI ATTA
BOY KOFI 12 years ago

I am more interested in Addison's refusal to admit that unsigned pink sheets by Presiding Officers at the polling stations could be signed at the Collation Centres.Dr Afari Gyan admitted that some pink sheets were unsigned bu ...
read full comment

I am more interested in Addison's refusal to admit that unsigned pink sheets by Presiding Officers at the polling stations could be signed at the Collation Centres.Dr Afari Gyan admitted that some pink sheets were unsigned but added that some were later signed at the Collation Centres.Surprisingly,Mr Addison said he is not interested in collation forms,he is not ready for it.Can you imaging the opportunity blown up by Addison?He could have used this occasion to get the much needed collation sheets from the EC.What a wasted opportunity?I strongly believe Mr Addison is not in court to win the petition,perhaps just to disgrace Dr Afari Gyan and this is not working.Thank you.
Okoe 12 years ago

This court case is an eye opener for many people including this writer. To all manner of persons who in the future will like to work for EC what will be at stake if they do not do their jobs professionally and as contained in ...
read full comment

This court case is an eye opener for many people including this writer. To all manner of persons who in the future will like to work for EC what will be at stake if they do not do their jobs professionally and as contained in the regulations and statues of the constitution.
Al Gashari 12 years ago

"I am not a lawyer but when I trained as Senior Caseworker who..."

How many times have we not heard you say such a thing? It's becoming boring...

Either you go and take a law degree or stop reminding us of your not havi ...
read full comment

"I am not a lawyer but when I trained as Senior Caseworker who..."

How many times have we not heard you say such a thing? It's becoming boring...

Either you go and take a law degree or stop reminding us of your not having one. You have the right to comment on legal issues whether you read law or not or even if you've not been trained as a UK case worker - senior or junior. Whatever the case, your arguments here will be judged solely on their merits, not on the legal qualifications you bring to them.

Then this thing about your not watching the proceedings for two weeks is also unnecessary. Now you are telling us you watched just a few minutes and those were enough to make you fire off an article. How many articles would you have written if you had watched all the two weeks? Five? Ten? One for every few minutes?

Just tell us what your argument is and stop all these extra- exo-skeletal information. They add nothing to the logic of the argument!
Paul Amuna 12 years ago

This is really funny and makes me lol!!! Al Gashari, the trouble is, Kofi Ata is too modest but that is just his personality. But I agree with you he should make no apologies and simply go straight to the point and express hi ...
read full comment

This is really funny and makes me lol!!! Al Gashari, the trouble is, Kofi Ata is too modest but that is just his personality. But I agree with you he should make no apologies and simply go straight to the point and express his opinions which by and large are sound in my considered view.
Akufo Addo 12 years ago

To wit, if water stays long in a bottle it stinks eventually. This is what is happening to Addison. More and worst blunders are yet to occur to humiliate him if he does not close his case. For now he has nothing new to offer. ...
read full comment

To wit, if water stays long in a bottle it stinks eventually. This is what is happening to Addison. More and worst blunders are yet to occur to humiliate him if he does not close his case. For now he has nothing new to offer. The case has collapsed.
PEKI TUMU 12 years ago

The respondent lawyers made a gigantic mistake. They should have accepted the documents as evidnece sunmited by the petitoners and then later on exposed it as a lie. This would have been more effective as an exposure of Mr Ad ...
read full comment

The respondent lawyers made a gigantic mistake. They should have accepted the documents as evidnece sunmited by the petitoners and then later on exposed it as a lie. This would have been more effective as an exposure of Mr Addission
Paul Amuna 12 years ago

I personally thought the justices had been extremely lenient with counsel Addison by not pursuing the matter further. Equally the counsels for respondents were rather magnanimous in not pursuing the matter as one of ETHICS.
...
read full comment

I personally thought the justices had been extremely lenient with counsel Addison by not pursuing the matter further. Equally the counsels for respondents were rather magnanimous in not pursuing the matter as one of ETHICS.

I commented at the time of that happening and questioned who was misleading the court - Addison of Afari Gyan since Addison had in his cross-examination of the witness accused him of trying to "mislead the court" with "multiple pink sheets" printed for the elections.

It is also interesting that the NPP media never picked on this matter and never pointed out how lucky their party and the petitioners were that the court did not make this an issue of 'perjury'.

Any how Kofi, I personally doubt that we have heard the last of this very matter as I strongly suspect that IF the justices have not themselves picked it up, I will be most surprised if in their summing up the counsels for respondents do not make this one of their key points to support their argument that the petition has been brought in "bad faith".

Honestly, I feel really sad that Ghana should be going through this, and rather worry why and how people will 'stoop so low' and / or go to such lengths to 'manufacture evidence' just to win a case!!! I also find it hard that people with a winning mentality can be 'blinded' to such an extent. A real shame for our democracy and the practice of law.
Kofi Ata, Cambridge, UK 12 years ago

Paul, you sounded as if the lawyers and the Justices let Addison off because of their fraternity. Did I get you right? Remember both lawyers and Justices belong to the same legal profession.

I agree with you that counsels ...
read full comment

Paul, you sounded as if the lawyers and the Justices let Addison off because of their fraternity. Did I get you right? Remember both lawyers and Justices belong to the same legal profession.

I agree with you that counsels for the respondents will raise the matter in their final submission. In fact, Tastsu set a trap for both Addison and the Justices but I left this out to shorten the article. When he was asked by one of the female Justices if it would be acceptable to them if the original register was used by Mr Addison, Tsatsu said, they will have no objection to that. This is a trap because Addison strongly objected to the EC tendering the Voters' Register in evidence and the Justices sustained his objection. So how could he turn round to tender the same material evidence that he had objected to earlier?
Paul Amuna 12 years ago

I very much doubt that "fraternity" could have been a basis for any apparent 'let off'. I see the trap you refer to from Tsatsu. When Addison had a similar opportunity earlier on (when the EC wanted to tender some original bi ...
read full comment

I very much doubt that "fraternity" could have been a basis for any apparent 'let off'. I see the trap you refer to from Tsatsu. When Addison had a similar opportunity earlier on (when the EC wanted to tender some original biometric and electoral register data), he made a 'calculated error' in my opinion when re fought hard and successfully objected to it. If you recall, I suggested this would come back to harm the petitioners and it has in several ways. I did not pick up "Tsatsu's trap" and thanks for spotting that.

Yes indeed, I rather suspect counsel for respondents will try to capitalise on it as 'yet another example of the error-strewn' petition from those who are accusing others of "gross errors" which affected the results of the polls.

On the part of the justices, if you listen carefully to the comments of the two justices in respect of that 'dodgy' list, they seemed to me not to want to create a fertile ground for another round of 'controversy' in the public with accusations of 'unfairness' from the NPP 'outside court'. Whether in their own summation they will take this particular issue into account, I am not sure. And as you have pointed out in your original article, whether the justices would 'cite' Addison for 'unethical practice' is also up for speculation.

These are just my observations and impressions but as always, and like most others, I could be completely wrong, and stand to be corrected.
BK 12 years ago

I believe Addison is quite a good lawyer, however the documents are prepared mostly for the lead lawyer, he does not have time himself to check all these documents. You have division of labour in such a complex case. I won't ...
read full comment

I believe Addison is quite a good lawyer, however the documents are prepared mostly for the lead lawyer, he does not have time himself to check all these documents. You have division of labour in such a complex case. I won't be surprised if after court he confronted the staff that prepared that document.
Kofi Ata, Cambridge, UK 12 years ago

BK, I think I alluded to your position in the article. However, if that was the case, then Addison was unaware at the time that the document was not authentic. If this assumption is right, then I would have expected Addison t ...
read full comment

BK, I think I alluded to your position in the article. However, if that was the case, then Addison was unaware at the time that the document was not authentic. If this assumption is right, then I would have expected Addison to have made a strong case in defence of the authenticity of the document instead of withdrawing it. That is what I would have done. His action or omission suggested that either he was aware the document was not genuine or he could not trust his subordinates. Whichever it was, the buck stops with him.

Again, from the Daily Graphic reports on the coverage of the hearing that I read, it appears documents have been given to the respondents by the petitioners that the respondents have identified many discrepancies. That should have warned Addison to ensure that his subordinates do their homework well before they provided him with this document/s for court. His failure suggests that either he is unable or unwilling to exercise proper supervisory role over the management and prosecution of the case, or perhaps, he is complicit. What do you think?

I am sorry to appear to be very harsh on Addison but I expect that since the petitioners are accusing the EC of fraud, then the petitioners must be whiter than white.
BOY KOFI 12 years ago

There is nothing he can do with billions of pink sheets.The EC does not declare results solely based on pink sheets but for some strange reasons Addison does not want anything to do with Collation Sheets.Even when Dr Gyan rem ...
read full comment

There is nothing he can do with billions of pink sheets.The EC does not declare results solely based on pink sheets but for some strange reasons Addison does not want anything to do with Collation Sheets.Even when Dr Gyan reminded him the importance and purpose of collation sheets,he snubbed.As for me,I remember vividly when Addison confessed that the respondents are not going to give him any chance to win the case.Thank you.
Paul Amuna 12 years ago

The fundamental flaw is to have one single legal expert advancing your case in such a landmark case. I would have expected up to three staunch legal specialists on the part of the petitioners to handle different key aspects o ...
read full comment

The fundamental flaw is to have one single legal expert advancing your case in such a landmark case. I would have expected up to three staunch legal specialists on the part of the petitioners to handle different key aspects of proceedings. That would allow Addison time to study and scrutinise or direct his 'clerks' to use a "tooth comb" to make sure that all information presented is checked, double-checked and consistent.

I rather disagree with your impression of him as a good lawyer. He has demonstrated in this case that he is not as good as others have always made him out to be. However 'good' you are, you cannot be 'jack and master' of all things you survey at the same time and Addison in my view has 'overreached' and is not receiving the necessary 'technical' support he needs.

If he is also relying on Dr Bawumiah's 'discredited analysis' then he is making a very big mistake. A very smart lawyer would approach this in a slightly different way. These are just my opinions.
Broni_Akamfuo 12 years ago

Writing contest with his 'good' friend Kwaku Asare, then I would recommend he makes the time to watch the entire proceedings so he can be in a better position to proffer sound opinions about developments that come up,as this ...
read full comment

Writing contest with his 'good' friend Kwaku Asare, then I would recommend he makes the time to watch the entire proceedings so he can be in a better position to proffer sound opinions about developments that come up,as this case goes on. Why did he write this piece if he was not seized with all the facts? And I frankly do not see the need to bring Tsikata and Lithur(who was`nt even in court on this particular day) into this discussion about the 'manufacturing' of evidence.
It is as if these other lead Attorneys have engaged in a suimilar conduct; which, as we are all aware, is not the case at all! Philip Addison stated in open court that he is not IT savvy,and therefore relies on people with the expertise in that area. That said, I think his to get the the document tendered into evidence even when some members of the bench had raised serious concerns is what is troubling.

46 Comments

Welcome,

SIGN IN

Welcome,

RESET PASSWORD

Hello,

Terms and conditions

REGISTER

Is Addison Perverting the Course of Justice?

Read Comments .st0{display:none;fill:#14BDD3;} .st1{display:none;} .st2{display:inline;fill:#FC0F0F;} .st3{display:inline;fill:#FFFFFF;} .st4{display:inline;fill:none;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:6;stroke-miterlimit:10;} Comments (46)

Read Comments Comments (46)