This article is closed for comments.
AUGUST 29, 2013
Nothing matters now !
Tweneboa-who-ever-you-are, Addison confuses you not everyone.
Tweneboa or who ever you are, I dont think you are even smart enough, we all heard and I dont think anyone needs your commentary now. If Addison confused you, that is not surprising and by the way there are some many more ou ...
read full comment
It will be better if you join the panel judge hearing the case rather than this constant disturbing of reade4w on this site.
You're the only confused one. Wait and see August 29
Sorry,I could not follow Addison's oral address.Now,I realise that I've not been the only one.His address had no flow or logic.
Unfortunately for you, the judgement in this case will be delivered by nine eminent judges who followed the oral address.
And the judges will still be as confused as all of us.
How many pink sheets were submitted in evidence by the petitioners?
Addison's address was clear and true so if you are confused it is because you are not by his side.
I WOULD HAVE BEEN HAPPIER IS 'PROF' HAD GIVEN HIS REAL NAME. OBVIOUSLY HE IS NOT A PROFESSOR BECAUSE HE UNDERSTOOD EVERYTHING ADDISION SAID FROM THE TRASH BAG.
Any kindergarten child would understand Addison's explanation about the pink sheets.It is only warped minds that would refuse to understand simple arithmetic. If you're confused wait until August 29th.
Confusion all over. Oh what a poor case. President at all cost indeed.
you are rather confused
It is no wonder that propaganda is now playing a major role for some people.This writer and Tsatsu the dreaded law man have now realized that the only way to win the case before SC is to rely on technicalities.They simply do ...
read full comment
Precisely my brother, Chachu is behaving like a a conman. He asserts that the petitioners did not serve the number of pink sheets that they stated on their affidavit, and cals for, an audit. He then refuses to tell the court ...
read full comment
WHAT DID ADDISON SAY IN HIS ADDRESS? THAT WHAT THE RESPONDENTS ARE SAYING, WE HAVE ANSWERED THEM IN OUR ADDRESS.......? IS THAT WHAT A PETITIONER'S ORAL ADDRESS MUST BE LIKE? DIDNT TSATSU, LITHUR AND QUARSHIE IDUN WRITE THE A ...
read full comment
People should not confuse the number of pink sheets with the number of votes that the complainants want annulled . The plaintiffs want a certain number of votes annulled and if that could be achieved with 1000 pink sheets tha ...
read full comment
The number of votes is contained in a set of pink sheets. So why is the number of pink sheets not important. This is where the case runs into difficulties. To annul the results the justices will have to establish that those s ...
read full comment
They said petitioners had no case and that the S.C will throw the case out, now look at them now ooo. Thank God you're not a judge and so your opinion of confusion is yours alone and not Philips. Check the judges and you will ...
read full comment
Does it mean the NDC can also tell all their pollen agents in the Ashanti and Eastern region next four years not to sign any pink sheet after the election so that it's considered as irregularities then by so doing they can go ...
read full comment
Nana Akua Tweneboah-Koduah/Margaret Jackson is JITTERY
Should I one day Need a lawyer one day and addison is the only lawyer availiable i will prefer not to hire him.
It is normal to find people like the author of this article who will never understand certain issues because they cannot understand. We all watch Addition clarifying this issue to the panel of judges who did not question him ...
read full comment
So how many pink sheets were submitted in evidence?