This article is closed for comments.
Why don't you represent Woyome and appeal against the ruling?
If you look at the Supreme Court ruling as factual, you will get the wrong impression as this Kwesi Kwaku guy but the SC in not trying to waste anybody's time after looking at Woyome fraudulent papers just applied the basic l ...
read full comment
So if he didn't have a contract, why did the SC state the contract was not approved by parliament? They would have said he didn't have a contract. Question is who subcontracted whom? If Woyome was the middle man or agent, and ...
read full comment
Waterville had the contract with government who subcontracted with Woyome to seek loans from banks for them.
Woyome branded a letter of recommendation from a deputy Minister when seeking a loan from Bank of Austria as a c ...
read full comment
Kwesi Kweku you sounds like a total idiot. Woyomi knew from the very onset that he was going to cheat by stealing from the Tax payers money in coraboration with his corrupt thieves in the NDC government, so don't be silly and ...
read full comment
You're right Kola, that's exactly what I was going to say. The Guy is a conman and should pay 103.4 million Cedis instead because the currency has lost its value since he collected the amount in 2009-2010.
How come that the Kola outside London rather writes perfect English and the one inside London is a total illiterate. Anyway contracts comes in different forms and guises so like Sarpong said, the SC cut out all the bullshit b ...
read full comment
You are an idiot and frankly you're pathetic. Why are you running your mouth about NDC being a sympathetic govt to Woyome? Did you know that when the taking was good, your npp guys were all over Woyome, enjoying his largess. ...
read full comment
Hahahahaha, now Woyome who calls himself as ndc financier is npp. The same Woyome who stole to build ndc headquarters. You illiterates ndc fool soldiers are really sorry sons of whores.
Kojo Nsiah go and have your bath but before that clean your amalgamated incomplete teeth.
YOU ODOURING ODIOT!!!
My friend don't ever think your support is not appreciated. I really appreciate your knockout punches to Kola. Keep the idiot down where he belongs.
I agree with the ruling by SC
First, let me make a comment on your name. I know of Kwesi Kojo (who was born at Sunday midnight and the parents decide to give him the names of the two days). Yours is a bit difficult to understand unless your mother was in ...
read full comment
Kofi falsely assumes that since there was an agreement that the contract will come into effect only after parliamentary oversight then that is set in sones.equity does not allow the law to be used as a conduit for fraud and s ...
read full comment
Kwesi Kweku or whatever he calls himself, another UK toilet cleaner who thinks that he knows better than the Supreme Court of Ghana.
ee
The writer of this article is very dishonest. What is the education of our contractors. To secure a contract of this magnitude ,consorting with foreign bankers etc. Someone of that caliber need to know the do's and dont't of ...
read full comment
Did you hear Woyome himself saying he had no CONTRACT WITH THE GOVERNMENT? So, what are you up to? It seems you are the only guy who has more sense than those who ruled in favor of the nation.
Kwesi Kweku,a peculiar name with a peculiar mindset.Woyome was fully aware that the payment was a big fraud.
All judgement debt we are paying now are the result of Kuffour & the NPP's greed to amass wealth & they really did.Thanks to the" angelic posture" of the late Mills, most NPP ministers should have been in jail by now.
Atroooo to get by. Lord will expose all.
Ignorance of the law does not permit you to break it. What work did he do to get such a gargantuan payment?
You've written the truth but small point of correction though, the SC silently admitted that woyome had a contract in their ruling. Read the ruling again. What maybe they wanted was for woyome to order parliament to approve h ...
read full comment
Whatever,if it did not meet the conditions required for it to be a contract,then my friend, it is not a contract.
Question is, have you seen any contract? A letter facilitaing the work of a subcontractor is not a contract
A letter facilitating the work of a subcontractor is even an enhancement of a contractual connection. The problem with you is that you think contract is something palpable and that it has a physical presence, it is NOT. Contr ...
read full comment
Simple question for you. Was the contract between the gov and woyome or woyome and another party. If A gives a contract to B to weed his house. B employs C to assist. C arrives at the hse of A and A opens the gate and allows ...
read full comment
Only someone born on two non-contiguous days would come up with such a reason to support Woyome's dubious claims.
How did the Government deceive Woyome? As an astute Business mogul as Woyome would have all see him, one wou ...
read full comment
Let us look at this matter in the round. On what grounds did the Government abrogate the contract with Waterville, such that all those whose services were engaged had genuine or "made up' aborted expenses? Can a Government ex ...
read full comment
You are right my brother Kwesi but as usual,the fatherless idiots would insult you. I´m not a fun of Woyome but I think he has been given a raw deal. It is left with him to do what is best fro him. If I were him, I would mak ...
read full comment
My brother Kwesi, this is Ghana for you. I wonder how often parliament had aproved contracts awarded by Kufour to his cronies for the 8 good years that he accidentally found himself looting this country. Yes, Woyome does not ...
read full comment
YOU ARE A FOOL
The SC ruling on the case is a call for advesarial legal system- this is great because the justices are applying and invoking the " Intrumentalism" theory of law:a pragmatic instrument of creativity and boldness for solving ...
read full comment
Woyome is a subcontractor who has been fully paid by the contractors. If anyone is going to sue anybody,assuming there is a breach of contract,it should be the contractors,not the sub contractor.
If there was a contract between the contractors and the gov't, will that contract bind the sub-contractors in the Specific performance by the contract document? Assuming the gov't is suing the contractors for breach of contra ...
read full comment
First of all no UK or any court in the world will reward the stupidity of a contractor who does not do due diligence. Secondly ignorance of the law is no excuse. It is the contractors responsibility to ensure that all I's are ...
read full comment
The SC ruling is correct and it will hold in the UK. You can contact me on quots148@googlemail.com for further clarification. I am procurement professional and I know what I am talking about. Thanks
Woyome must cough out that money. All those he shared it with must be asked to bring the money back.
51 million GHS is too huge an amount to be given to one Ghanaian for no work done. How did they even come to that figure ...
read full comment