RE: Assassination attempt is proof Mahama is as great as Nkrumah

Read Comments Comments (8)

• KUTRIKU 10 years ago

  NONSENSE. THIS GUY IS THE MOST CORRUPT PRESIDENT GHANA HAS EVER HAD. HE IS EVEN BEEN SUSPECTED IN THE MURDER OF THE LATE PRES. MILLS. HE HASN'T COME CLEAN ON THE ALLEGATION OF STEALING FROM THE PURCHASE OF PLANES FROM BRAZIL. ...
  read full comment

  NONSENSE. THIS GUY IS THE MOST CORRUPT PRESIDENT GHANA HAS EVER HAD. HE IS EVEN BEEN SUSPECTED IN THE MURDER OF THE LATE PRES. MILLS. HE HASN'T COME CLEAN ON THE ALLEGATION OF STEALING FROM THE PURCHASE OF PLANES FROM BRAZIL. YOU BENEFIT FFROM HIM. NO WONDER

  reply
• Atugabiig 10 years ago

  ELVIS, YOU ARE SICK. YOU NEED TO HAVE YOUR HEAD EXAMINED.

  ELVIS, YOU ARE SICK. YOU NEED TO HAVE YOUR HEAD EXAMINED.

  reply
• Mahmoud 10 years ago

  Mr. Elvis, could you remember that Nkrumah used to incite workers to strike against the Whiteman but outlawed strikes in his regime when living conditions were genuinely difficult for them and said that strikes were unpatriot ...
  read full comment

  Mr. Elvis, could you remember that Nkrumah used to incite workers to strike against the Whiteman but outlawed strikes in his regime when living conditions were genuinely difficult for them and said that strikes were unpatriotic?
  "Communism was intended as a political-economic system which would liberate oppressed workers in industrialized western countries. It never took root in the intended environment and instead spread to undeveloped agrarian countries, the largest being Russia and China. Instead of liberating workers, the ideology was co-opted and used as a stepping stone to power by dictators who became the new oppressors. I wonder if Marx and Engels envisioned their system being used by Stalin or Mao to starve, massacre and imprison tens of millions of their own citizens. Again a movement flourished in a different country from its birth and in a different way than was intended."

  reply
• Nii Teiko 10 years ago

  Thief of Bagdad. You now get mouth to speak. Your days are surely numbered.

  Thief of Bagdad. You now get mouth to speak. Your days are surely numbered.

  reply
• Salifu Atampuree 10 years ago

  Elvis is a thin-skin thief!

  Elvis is a thin-skin thief!

  reply
• Soomui 10 years ago

  This Elvis Afriyie Ankrah guy is lucky that he quickly came out to refute this story. I would have torn him to shreds for having the audacity to even mention Nkrumah and Mahama in the same breath.
  
  I didnt read the whole ar ...
  read full comment

  This Elvis Afriyie Ankrah guy is lucky that he quickly came out to refute this story. I would have torn him to shreds for having the audacity to even mention Nkrumah and Mahama in the same breath.
  
  I didnt read the whole article but if, as it seems, he knows that his boss has lowered his own image and credibility to the lowest ranks of politics in this country, then I will stop here. Being the son of a man who is said to have worked Nkrumah, non of us thought that it was possible that President Mahama would disgrace himself to depths which are even lower than the shameful depths of the despicable Danquah-Busia clique.

  reply
• JJ 10 years ago

  How dare you compare this corrupt and inept, this stinking and inferior Mahama to leaders of the world? Has he lost his senses?

  How dare you compare this corrupt and inept, this stinking and inferior Mahama to leaders of the world? Has he lost his senses?

  reply
• Says Who 10 years ago

  He does not need a legal firm to issue this rejoinder. Infact he does not have to say anything. The said publication may have appeared as you have stated but the truth be said; no one gives any notice of utterances of psycoph ...
  read full comment

  He does not need a legal firm to issue this rejoinder. Infact he does not have to say anything. The said publication may have appeared as you have stated but the truth be said; no one gives any notice of utterances of psycophants these days.
  
  And just before you get your back up, just bear in mind that; a statement of fact in connection to an allegation, cannot be grounds for libel or slander if it is denied.
  
  Therefore if it is stated that the said publication was made by a psychophant and you state that your client did not make the said statement, then it follows no action can be instituted on his behalf for being a psychophant, because you said he did not make the statement.
  
  Therefore it does not apply to him. Right.

  reply