kufuor is part of afican poverty problems.God bless Dr Nrumah for ruling Ghana with kindvess and honesty.and also Dr Hilla Limaxnn
kufuor is part of afican poverty problems.God bless Dr Nrumah for ruling Ghana with kindvess and honesty.and also Dr Hilla Limaxnn
Paa Reality 8 years ago
Myth: GMOs Are Just an Extension of Natural Breeding Techniques
Many GMO proponents claim that genetic engineering is just an extension of natural breeding methods, and just as safe. Nothing could be further from the truth ... read full comment
Myth: GMOs Are Just an Extension of Natural Breeding Techniques
Many GMO proponents claim that genetic engineering is just an extension of natural breeding methods, and just as safe. Nothing could be further from the truth — on both counts.
Genetic engineering is radically different from conventional breeding techniques used to improve a crop. For starters, it’s a laboratory-based technique allowing scientists to create a food that could never be created by nature. As explained by Robinson:
“Genetic engineering enables DNA to be transferred not only between different kinds of plants, but even between different kingdoms. You can take DNA from an insect, an animal, or a bacterium, and insert it into the genome of a food crop plant.
This is actually a very imprecise process. What happens is that you’re disrupting the genome of the plant. We found time and time again that there are unexpected effects on the plant that is genetically engineered.
They tell us that it’s exactly the same, except for the inserted gene that’s been deliberately put in...But this isn’t the case. The genome is very complex. It’s not like Lego; you can’t just take out one bit, put in another bit, and expect there to be no knock-on effects.”
Unintended and Unforeseeable Side Effects Abound
There have been many occasions where the GE crop has been unexpectedly toxic or allergenic when the non-GE crop had no such issues. The reality is that scientists really don’t know what they’re doing in terms of what side effects are produced by DNA tampering. The effects are very unpredictable.
Genetic engineers are just now starting to admit this. Ironically, many of the drawbacks of genetic engineering, including the fact that it’s imprecise, were not openly admitted until they came out with a new technique, called gene editing or CRISPR technology, which is said to be far more precise than earlier methods.
Alas, even CRISPR creates off-target effects, according to Robinson. So we’re still far from knowing all there is to know about genetic manipulation.
GMO Creation Is a Cruel and Wasteful Enterprise
Genetic engineering is also a very wasteful process. You create an enormous number of plants that are deformed, infertile, or otherwise not viable, so there’s a lot of waste. When it comes to the creation of GE animals there’s also the moral aspect of creating so many non-viable life forms.
“One of the scientists who I’m in contact with happened to see some of the genetically modified salmon that were created while the company was trying to come up with their AquAdvantage fast-growing GE salmon. He said it was really shocking, because there were salmon that were green in color.
There were salmon that had lumps all over their bodies. All these had to be thrown away... I think it’s a very cruel process, because you’re creating so many non-viable animals, and you have to dispose of them.”
Myth: Hundreds of Millions of GMO Meals Served With No Adverse Effects
Another completely unscientific and dishonest claim used to justify the use of GMOs is that Americans have eaten hundreds of millions of GMO meals with no ill effects. But who’s actually checking? No one is assessing and keeping tabs of potential side effects. You can’t even make that connection since GE foods are not labeled.
Despite that lack of traceability, health statistics clearly show Americans have been getting increasingly sicker over the past few decades. Chronic diseases are definitely increasing, and children are increasingly coming down with diseases that in the past did not arise until much later in life. No one can say for sure that there’s a link to GMO consumption since they’re not labeled and therefore cannot be tracked, but you certainly cannot ignore the possibility of a link either.
Myth: Without GE Crops We Cannot Feed the World
Another common claim is that we need GMOs because without them we don’t stand a chance to feed our growing population. This is nothing but a flawed fantasy, and there are at least half a dozen truths that dispel it.
Part of the myth is that GE crops provide greater yield, but they don’t. There is no gene for high yield. The GMO genes inserted are for creating herbicide tolerance or to produce internal insecticide. There is no way of genetically engineering high yield into a crop.
Conventional breeding methods are helpful for increasing yield however. So a high-yielding GE crop is simply a crop that has been conventionally bred to produce high yields. Then the genetic engineers inserted an herbicide-tolerant gene or an insect-resistant gene into that plant.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) even admits that yield is dependent on the background genetics of the crop; it is not dependent on the genetic engineering. In some cases the GE crop ends up yielding less than its non-GE equivalent.
That is certainly the case with GE soy, where there is what is known as a yield drag. It yields less than the non-GM soy. Exactly why is still unknown, but Robinson suggests it’s possible the GE plant’s energy is somehow used up in resisting herbicide, for example, and therefore has less energy left over for growth.
Soil Destruction Promotes Food Scarcity
GE plants — courtesy of the herbicides used — also destroy the microbial health of the soil. Ultimately, you need the microbes in the soil to nourish the plant, and it’s this symbiotic relationship that provides good yields.
From a long-term strategic perspective, destruction of topsoil is the greatest threat to the future of food, and if we continue in this way, people will starve no matter what GE plants they come up with. It’s a prescription for disaster. Once you implement regenerative agriculture you almost automatically create far greater yields, as these time-honored traditions nourish and build soil health.
“There’s some very good long-term research done at Rodale Institute which shows that year upon year, the yields with organic systems can go up and up and up, because the soil is being built. Also, organics yield better in drought conditions, because there’s more organic matter in the soil. It acts like a sponge and it can hold water.
If we’re thinking about resilient agriculture that’s going to tide us through climate change and everything else the future can throw at us, it’s really agroecology, organic, and building soil. We certainly don’t want to be killing soil by putting glyphosate on it. We do know that putting glyphosate herbicide on the soil actually ties up nutrients within the soil. It makes them less available to the plant and less available to us when we eat those plants,” Robinson says.
The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has also classified glyphosate as a probable carcinogen. Over 80 percent of GE plants are engineered to be heavily doused with Roundup, which is over a hundred times more toxic than glyphosate in isolation. Roundup gets incorporated into the entire plant, and cannot be washed off, so when you eat those plants, you’re eating a potential carcinogen.
Myth: GMOs Reduce the Need for Herbicides and Insecticides
Genetic engineering was sold as a means to reduce the amount of herbicides and chemicals being used, but the reality is quite the opposite. GE crops have increased the use of pesticides, mostly because of herbicide-tolerant crops designed to survive huge amounts of herbicide. As weeds have developed tolerance, farmers are forced to use ever-greater amounts of chemicals.
Research by Charles Benbrook, a professor at the Center for Sustaining Agriculture and Natural Resources at Washington State University shows that because of GE crops, we have sprayed 7 percent more pesticides than we would have done had those same acres been planted with non-GE crops. That amounts to 404 million pounds of additional pesticides.
In addition to that, more than 61 million acres of U.S. farmland is now covered with glyphosate-resistant super weeds. To address these weeds, even more toxic chemicals are being employed, such as Dicamba and 2,4-D (which is an ingredient of Agent Orange). So not only are we using more herbicides, we’re also using increasingly toxic ones.
“Also, there’s a report1 called the International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development (IAASTD), which was published in 2008 by over 400 world scientists. It was on the future of food and the future of agriculture. They concluded that GE crops were not needed to feed the world.
They pointed out that the yields of GE crops were ‘variable,’ as they put it. In some cases, a GE crop might yield more; but in other cases, they don’t. Also there were lingering safety concerns over them. They said that the key to feeding the world and future generations will be agroecology.”
Who Benefits From GE Crops?
The answer is the companies that patent and own them. Profit is the real reason why GE crops are pushed so relentlessly in spite of the fact that they don’t yield more and they don’t reduce pesticide use. When you patent a GE crop, you not only own the rights on the particular crop, you also own the breeding rights.
Every crop bred from that GE crop, as long as your proprietary patented genes are in that progene, you own the progene as well as the original crop. So patenting GE seeds is a means of consolidating control over the food supply by a few big companies.
The U.S. government does nothing to prevent this, and the reason for that is because there are perpetually revolving doors between the industry and the government. It’s gotten to the point where the USDA is in practical reality a mere extension of Monsanto and other chem-ag giants, implementing and enforcing the industry’s recommendations.
“Michael Taylor is a case in point. He was an attorney for Monsanto. He crafted the biotech policy that enabled these foods to be marketed onto world markets from the USA. Michael Taylor oversaw the creation of that policy. He was basically an attorney for Monsanto, and still is. People often think that Europe is somehow better. Unfortunately, our own Food Safety Authority (FSA) has been absolutely infiltrated by industry people.
There’s a body called the International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI), which is basically funded by Monsanto, Bayer, DuPont, and these big GMO companies. They’re this kind of scientific lobbying-style organization. They craft rules, regulatory rules to judge the safety of GE crops.
They actually design them. A lot of these rules have now gone into the European regulatory process to judge whether a GE crop is safe. Basically, we can say the industry wrote its own examination.”
Public Scientists Are Also Motivated by Greed
As revealed in “Altered Genes, Twisted Truth,” the collusion between the industry and the government would never have been possible had it not been for the early molecular biologists who collectively agreed to allow genetic engineering of plants to proceed, and intentionally kept the public from being informed about the risks. Still to this day, many public scientists have jumped on the bandwagon to support GMOs because they see it as a way to get funding from the industry.
“I’ve actually quizzed some of them about the animal feeding studies with GE crops. Not only have those scientists never read an animal feeding study on GE crops – I’m not talking about all of them here, just these few examples who I’ve met – but they see no reason why they should.
One of them said to me, ‘Why should I read those studies?’ I said, ‘Because you’re genetically engineering our plants.’ ‘Oh, what harm can possibly come of it,’ he says. ‘It’s just a matter of moving around a few genes. It’s nothing very scary.’ Again and again, we see this arrogant attitude.”
GMO Research Is Being Aggressively Thwarted
Not only do independent researchers rarely get access to GE seeds to perform their research, they also have few means of funding since they’re not interested in bending to the will of the industry. Industry funds most research, and they have a long history of “motivating” their scientists to reach certain conclusions.
Without funding, there’s not much a concerned scientist can do. Even if you manage to get funding from some government agency, they will often demand you have an industry partner to put up part of the money.
Moreover, those who have somehow managed to get around all of these obstacles to do these kinds of studies and reach negative conclusions typically end up being ostracized by the scientific community. Many have lost their jobs, and have had their entire scientific careers go up in flames. As noted by Robinson:
“It certainly is true that if you are a scientist who draws attention to risks of GE crops or whose research shows such risks, you are in danger of losing your job. You are in danger of never getting funding from anybody ever again. I’ve seen this happen now so many times that it is predictable.
Scientists have basically entered a cage voluntarily, if you can use that word “voluntarily” of this situation. Basically, they don’t ask the awkward questions. They don’t do the awkward research that may show the problems with GE crops. They stay clear of it.
A friend of mine actually got together some independent funding for GMO risk research in the form of an animal feeding study. They approached a university and said, ‘Here, we’ve raised some money. Please, can your scientists research the safety of this GE crop when fed to animals?’ The scientists would not touch that money because they were frightened of losing their jobs. This is a very, very serious situation.
If we’re seriously interested in finding out the truth about GE crops, if we’re interested in finding out more than we already know, it’s going to come down to the public putting up the money and finding scientists who somehow will never need to worry about industry funding ever again. Probably they have to be retired or they have to be very, very unusual people.”
Any Government who allows GMO crops in Africa should be charged and EXECUTED for Crimes against Humanity by THE PEOPLE
ghanaman 8 years ago
It is pleasure to note the come back of the author. Enjoyed reading your latest article. Welcome home, and please give us a lot more of your pieces. Best.
It is pleasure to note the come back of the author. Enjoyed reading your latest article. Welcome home, and please give us a lot more of your pieces. Best.
FOYOOSIS 8 years ago
Welcome back to the forum, Angelina, my long lost friend. Why have you gone so long hibernating? Or is it because our comments to your perevious articles were so boring you decided not to feed us anymore, out of anger, perhap ... read full comment
Welcome back to the forum, Angelina, my long lost friend. Why have you gone so long hibernating? Or is it because our comments to your perevious articles were so boring you decided not to feed us anymore, out of anger, perhaps?
It's good you're back and i urge you to keep blowing the trumpet, for we are listening and working on our individual attitude for change.
Mr Bond 8 years ago
Congratulation and your article deserve standing ovation well written and sure no politics involved and the maturity in it is phenomenon.Thank you.It is very sad that our president claim to a Christian but do not read the Bib ... read full comment
Congratulation and your article deserve standing ovation well written and sure no politics involved and the maturity in it is phenomenon.Thank you.It is very sad that our president claim to a Christian but do not read the Bible to get the Bible knowledge to rule Ghana but resort to the devil wisdom,Wickedness,murder and avarice to rule the country.Douth am full of nonsense the Holy Spirit reveal something very important to me to use a simple figures to solve to get to understand it.what came to my mind was Ghana population which 25 million and the day Akua Donkor blaspheme that president John Dramani Mahama is God that is the day the spirit reveal to me and that same day the Panama paper came to light and expose rots with the media figured both Kufour and Annan and left Mahama out of the scandal but it appears that president John Dramani Mahama stole $10 billion US dollars and he rule over 10 regions.The spirit draw my focus and attention to once again the Bible into the books of Matthew 25 and the spirit as me the to use the first name of our president which is John and use the $10 billion he has stolen and also use the number of regions he rule or precede.So it gave me John 10:10.Matthew 25 was base on responsibility,stewardship and probity transparent and accountability and development of talents to advance but which president John Dramani Mahama lacks and John 10:10 exposed president John Dramani Mahama as a thief who cometh not to development the country and it economy but for to steal and to kill and to destroy.We saw how president John Dramani Mahama has destroy NHIS,school feeding,cocoa spraying,Both teachers and Nurses training allowances.The killing of Mills and those that travel abroad to seek medical attention because our hospital lacks common simple equipments to help treats ailments and they end up dying abroad because president John Dramani Mahama has stolen $10 billion dollars and deposited it into is offshore accounts and people are dying unnecessary death that is preventable by due to selfish avarice of president John Dramani Mahama stealing All Ghana money for himself and denial the country development and jobs our development is in a sorry state.
THE MAWULIAN 8 years ago
You are sooooo RIGHT!!!!
WE Africans & blacks just cant rule ourselves-and we feel insulted if we are told the truth.
When did Haiti, Liberia get independence? They are still SHIT-HOLES!! See Malasia!!!! What a difference! ... read full comment
You are sooooo RIGHT!!!!
WE Africans & blacks just cant rule ourselves-and we feel insulted if we are told the truth.
When did Haiti, Liberia get independence? They are still SHIT-HOLES!! See Malasia!!!! What a difference!!!
kufuor is part of afican poverty problems.God bless Dr Nrumah for ruling Ghana with kindvess and honesty.and also Dr Hilla Limaxnn
Myth: GMOs Are Just an Extension of Natural Breeding Techniques
Many GMO proponents claim that genetic engineering is just an extension of natural breeding methods, and just as safe. Nothing could be further from the truth ...
read full comment
It is pleasure to note the come back of the author. Enjoyed reading your latest article. Welcome home, and please give us a lot more of your pieces. Best.
Welcome back to the forum, Angelina, my long lost friend. Why have you gone so long hibernating? Or is it because our comments to your perevious articles were so boring you decided not to feed us anymore, out of anger, perhap ...
read full comment
Congratulation and your article deserve standing ovation well written and sure no politics involved and the maturity in it is phenomenon.Thank you.It is very sad that our president claim to a Christian but do not read the Bib ...
read full comment
You are sooooo RIGHT!!!!
WE Africans & blacks just cant rule ourselves-and we feel insulted if we are told the truth.
When did Haiti, Liberia get independence? They are still SHIT-HOLES!! See Malasia!!!! What a difference! ...
read full comment