This article is closed for comments.
This Founder's/Founders' day when was it instituted and why? Was that what Ghanaians wanted at the time? The name Jubilee house; was it political? The change from Jubilee to Flagstaff house when and why was that done? Was it ...
read full comment
Overall a great article but an important disagreement must also be expressed.
Nkrumah may not have been "a good manager of our economy after winning freedom", in your eyes, but he sure got you free education right up throu ...
read full comment
I wonder whether the building of infrastructure both human,industrial and technological could amount to bad economy.
Basic infrastructure in education,energy,factories and roads and townships to accommodate and educate a y ...
read full comment
Doc;isn't it the same people who are there now when Ghana was given opportunity by IMF along with South Korea,Malaysia and Singapore to redeemed themselves from stats-quo:what went wrong..Doc;isn't it Osafo Marfo and Ofori-At ...
read full comment
Remit errors pls.
DON'T MIND THE LAZY DOC.HE FAILED MISERABLY TO SHOW THAT SOUTH KOREA,MALAYSIA,SINGAPORE WAS RULED BY ONE-MAN FIST FOR OVER 30(THIRTY)YEARS COMPARED KWAME NKRUMAH.
When? When Akufo Addo Returns The Horn.
When shall we overcome? .. When we stop the tribalism, greed and begin to have confidence in ourselves as black Africans. When we sincerely work for the betterment of our community
You must be kidding by saying nkrumah was not a good manager of the economy.
Declaration is not proof. The professor is the first person to know that, as an academic, it is unacceptable to make an accusation or argument without any proof. He also knows, as a clinical psychiatrist, that to declare som ...
read full comment
Read Meredith's "The state of Africa" or David Rooney's biography of Osagyefo. Both are kind but objective.
Did u go to school at all, Mr writer, this is a chop bar analysis.only npp will take u serious
It's the mark of educated mind to be able to entertain other thoughts without insulting or demeaning them. The writer has done a great with his analysis. If you can't praise him, don't demean his thoughts.
Writer has done a great job with his analysis!
The writer is obviously an Nkrumaist but is objective enough to say Nkrumah had his faults. That is where we fail as Ghanaians. No one is perfect and if we do not analyse our failures we will not ever improve.
The author is obviously an Nkrumahist but he is prepared to look at Nkrumah's failures along with his successes. If we do not examine our failures,how will we ever improve?