Why the death of capitalism is eminent with the growing advancement in Technology

Read Comments Comments (8)

• KSP 8 years ago

  You assume that the capitalist's methods are static. You assume that the capitalist is unthinking in his pursuit of profit.
  
  The historical evidence does not support these assumptions.

  You assume that the capitalist's methods are static. You assume that the capitalist is unthinking in his pursuit of profit.
  
  The historical evidence does not support these assumptions.

  reply
• YG 8 years ago

  The capitalist is not infallible. he is bound to make mistakes just like any other human, and from some of his mistakes will come his downfall... The only thing that has kept capitalist going is violence... The sense of logic ...
  read full comment

  The capitalist is not infallible. he is bound to make mistakes just like any other human, and from some of his mistakes will come his downfall... The only thing that has kept capitalist going is violence... The sense of logical reasoning supporting capitalism died ages ago. the death of more eminent than even we think

  reply
• Osei Boakye 8 years ago

  Both capitalists and socialists are not educating themselves fast enough about the ever- accelerating pace of technology to keep pace with the changes being made by the medium.

  Both capitalists and socialists are not educating themselves fast enough about the ever- accelerating pace of technology to keep pace with the changes being made by the medium.

  reply
• KOO 8 years ago

  Capitalism will not die because of technological advancements.On the contrary,it will flourish because the capitalist is quick to swish to latest innovations to enhance his production and improve his profit margins.Truly,this ...
  read full comment

  Capitalism will not die because of technological advancements.On the contrary,it will flourish because the capitalist is quick to swish to latest innovations to enhance his production and improve his profit margins.Truly,this development has resulted in the use of lesser worker due to clever innovations on production lines.However,socialism cannot be seen as the ideology that can change this situation.The Russians and the Chinese are using advance tech to improve on their production levels.Capitalism is not going away anytime soon.In fact,it is being said that now it is not necessary to fear the Chinese for their Communism but rather of their capitalism.

  reply
• Kwadwo Gyamfi 8 years ago

  While capitalism is adapting slowly to innovation changes in technology, socialism on the other hand is adapting slowly to changes in capitalism belatedly, because socialism doesn't have modern day Karl Marx, Vladimir Leni ...
  read full comment

  While capitalism is adapting slowly to innovation changes in technology, socialism on the other hand is adapting slowly to changes in capitalism belatedly, because socialism doesn't have modern day Karl Marx, Vladimir Lenin, Mao Zedon, Kwame Nkrumah, nor Julius Nyerere.

  reply
• SWEET STACKLEBERG 8 years ago

  Every once in a while, a fuckwit of a commie, bored to death with the end of his rat-ass ideology comes out to pronounce the death of capitalism. It all started with Karl Marx and obviously continues with this fool Gariba Yu ...
  read full comment

  Every once in a while, a fuckwit of a commie, bored to death with the end of his rat-ass ideology comes out to pronounce the death of capitalism. It all started with Karl Marx and obviously continues with this fool Gariba Yusef
  
  Capitalism is natural, buying and selling free from any externally imposed orders to fix prices. It is capitalism that has given Yusef everything.. He and his commies save money in capitalist banks, ride in cars made by capitalist firms and anyway why do I have a feeling Yusef owns property and should the commies ever try to seize it in the interest of the state, Yusef the cock sucker will resist to his last drop of blood
  
  So Yuesf, bugger off and on your way out, suck a fart out of my anus!

  reply
• ..... 8 years ago

  Yusef do you mean IMMINENT or Eminent?

  Yusef do you mean IMMINENT or Eminent?

  reply
• IDRIS PACAS 8 years ago

  Thanks for writing

  Thanks for writing

  reply