Our current knowledge will be a lie in the future

Read Comments Comments (5)

• gracy 8 years ago

  Nice piece there. My concern is when it comes to religious beliefs and knowledge they are very difficult to state categorically that something is true or because is a believer. This means it might not really have better expl ...
  read full comment

  Nice piece there. My concern is when it comes to religious beliefs and knowledge they are very difficult to state categorically that something is true or because is a believer. This means it might not really have better explanations - just believe it. Some believe without even experiencing it. It is easy to challenge a universal knowledge but difficult when is a faith.

  reply
• KONKONSA 8 years ago

  Great piece. It gives me great pleasure to read intelligent material as this because I am consoled that not all the 27million are gullible. You could do well to expatiate and do a more detailed analysis.

  Great piece. It gives me great pleasure to read intelligent material as this because I am consoled that not all the 27million are gullible. You could do well to expatiate and do a more detailed analysis.

  reply
• Kwabena Yeboah 8 years ago

  To quote from the the writer:
  
  "Knowledge is an easily acquired unreliable asset! The continuous reliance on whatever portrays an individual as "knowledgeable" can likewise, portray the same individual as clueless and outda ...
  read full comment

  To quote from the the writer:
  
  "Knowledge is an easily acquired unreliable asset! The continuous reliance on whatever portrays an individual as "knowledgeable" can likewise, portray the same individual as clueless and outdated in the long run."
  
  I have a problem with the writer's diction, but that is beside the point.
  
  However the point is, over generalization in any discourse is unintelligent and in fact dangerous. What is this writer trying to put across. Is he telling me my current knowledge will be a lie in the future?
  
  Let's test his assertion using logic:
  
  Premise: my knowledge of 2+2 will always be 4 in the future.
  Conclusion: only under certain circumstances.
  
  If I should ask the writer of this article to evaluate the above statement, what would his answer be? Is the above statement logically correct?
  
  Writing for public consumption has never been a walk in the park, that is why it is imperative that those who choose to write for that purpose should think deeply of how they present themselves to the public because you do not know who will read your material.
  
  In fact, I have a serious problem with the writer's diction, but that is for another day.

  reply
• GLORY 8 years ago

  *It's middle of the year already. Get your hands busy. Learn ! Get " Mobile Phones and Tablets Repairs : A Complete Guide for Beginners and Professionals " and make cool cash! Guaranteed* Visit Amazon, Barnes & Noble, eBay et ...
  read full comment

  *It's middle of the year already. Get your hands busy. Learn ! Get " Mobile Phones and Tablets Repairs : A Complete Guide for Beginners and Professionals " and make cool cash! Guaranteed* Visit Amazon, Barnes & Noble, eBay etc Or use link;
  https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/9789534116?keywords=mobile%20phones%20and%20tablets%20repairs&pc_redir=T1&qid=1463153220&sr=8-8

  reply
• Bones 8 years ago

  Kwabena, 2+2 = 10
  That is base 4.
  In the digital world, binary is king.
  2+2 in the near future will be 100
  As digital systems will be dominant

  Kwabena, 2+2 = 10
  That is base 4.
  In the digital world, binary is king.
  2+2 in the near future will be 100
  As digital systems will be dominant

  reply