Ending election-year Labour agitation, the role of Government and Labour leadership

As Ghana edges closer to the 2024 elections, the familiar stirrings of labour unrest have already begun. Election years in the country are often marred by strikes, protests, and agitations, particularly from the labour front. From teachers to nurses, civil servants to traders, the demand for better wages, improved working conditions, and delayed allowances frequently surges during this time. But why does this happen, and what role do both the government and labour leadership play in managing these tensions?

Historically, election years have always brought heightened expectations, with labour unions viewing this period as a prime opportunity to make their voices heard. Politicians, wary of losing votes, are often seen as more likely to yield to demands. It is a well-known strategy, and in the past, some governments have succumbed to pressure to avoid negative press and maintain public favour. But is this approach sustainable, and can we finally put an end to these recurring agitations?

The Government’s Role

Governments, regardless of the ruling party, have a significant role to play in preventing labour unrest, especially during election periods. First and foremost, there must be a proactive approach to addressing workers' grievances. Waiting until election year to tackle wage discrepancies, unpaid allowances, or poor working conditions creates a breeding ground for discontent. It is not surprising, then, that labour agitations flare up just when political stakes are high.

Moreover, clear communication is essential. Governments need to be transparent about what they can realistically deliver, given the country’s economic state. Recent economic challenges, including the impacts of global issues such as COVID-19 and the ongoing Russia-Ukraine conflict, have placed immense pressure on Ghana's economy. These realities cannot be ignored when discussing worker demands. However, it is the government's responsibility to engage labour unions in sincere dialogue, ensuring that the expectations of workers are managed long before the election bells toll.

The introduction of policies such as the Single Spine Salary Structure (SSSS) was aimed at addressing wage inequalities across the public sector. While it was a positive step, challenges remain, and the need for further reforms is evident. Governments must not only ensure that workers are fairly compensated but must also provide guarantees that these compensations will not only be tied to election years.

Labour Leadership’s Role

On the flip side, labour unions have a responsibility to their members but must also consider the broader context in which their demands are made. While it is their duty to advocate for workers’ rights, it is equally important to avoid using election periods as leverage to force government hands.

Labour leadership needs to engage in constructive dialogue, not only when it is convenient but consistently throughout a government’s tenure. The approach of holding governments hostage during election periods only weakens the credibility of the unions and creates an adversarial relationship. Labour leaders must recognise that their demands should be based on the merits of their case, not the political climate.

Furthermore, unions must be realistic in their demands. While advocating for better conditions, they must be mindful of the economic constraints the country faces. Striking a balance between advocating for workers and acknowledging the nation’s financial realities is key to preventing unnecessary agitations.

Building a Sustainable Dialogue

The solution to this cycle of election-year labour unrest lies in a long-term approach to labour relations. Governments must engage with unions throughout their term, addressing issues as they arise rather than postponing them until election time. Labour unions, for their part, must commit to working with governments in good faith, negotiating for their members’ rights based on facts and fairness, not political expediency.

Additionally, a formal mechanism for resolving labour disputes outside of election years would go a long way in reducing the tensions that often arise. This could be in the form of a permanent labour relations committee that meets quarterly to assess and address ongoing concerns.

To wrap it up, breaking the cycle of election-year agitations requires commitment from both the government and labour leadership. The future of Ghana’s workforce and the nation’s stability should not be held hostage to political timelines. Only through sincere, continuous dialogue and realistic expectations can the labour front achieve its goals without resorting to disruptive protests during critical national periods.

What's your mind? Share your thoughts with us