Is Organised Labour’s planned strike over Galamsey a step in the wrong direction?

Organised labour’s decision to proceed with a nationwide strike from 10th October in protest against galamsey is creating ripples across Ghana. But is it the right move? The growing frustration with illegal mining has been understandable. It has left behind devastated water bodies and degraded forests. However, the term "galamsey," originally meaning “gather and sell” as small-scale mining, has evolved to refer to illegal mining, giving the entire practice a bad reputation.

The upcoming strike risks punishing the wrong parties. There are legitimate small-scale miners who have invested heavily in their operations, adhered to regulations, and provided employment to countless Ghanaians. Their operations contribute positively to local economies, offering a livelihood to millions across the country. By calling for a blanket strike, organised labour may inadvertently be jeopardising the survival of law-abiding operators, whose efforts are in line with Ghana’s economic and environmental aspirations.

Furthermore, the involvement of labour in galamsey protests, while well-intentioned, may not effectively address the core issues. Strikes could lead to further economic strain, especially in a country already battling inflation and economic challenges. Dialogue between government, labour leadership, and stakeholders in the mining industry seems a more prudent approach to distinguish between the rogue elements and legitimate operators. The government's role should be to enforce mining laws with precision, not eliminate an entire industry that supports millions of livelihoods.

Instead of embarking on nationwide strikes, wouldn’t it be wiser to support the government's efforts to regulate and formalize small-scale mining? Strikes could set the nation back, particularly for regions and communities that depend on regulated mining activities for their survival. The fight against illegal mining is crucial, but it should be tackled with strategic enforcement and responsible governance rather than widespread protests that could potentially destabilise the nation further.

Let’s rethink the approach—tackling galamsey requires unity, dialogue, and smart policies that preserve livelihoods while protecting our natural resources.

What's your mind? Share your thoughts with us