Akufo-Addo not fighting corruption

The former advisor on Governance and Corruption to ex-President John Dramani Mahama, Daniel Batidam, has chastised the Akufo-Addo’s government for doing nothing to fight corruption.

This follows Ghana’s worse performance in the last six years in its fight against corruption, the latest corruption perception index (CPI), has revealed.

Daniel Batidam, who has worked with the global anti-corruption organization, Transparency International (TI) observed that the Akufo-Addo government, has not done much to its credit when it comes to the fight against corruption.

“I am worried that after years of steady progress which took us from as low as 38percent in 2009 to 48 percent in 2014, we are sliding backwards again…virtually, nothing has happened in the area of fighting corruption when the NPP came into power”, Mr. Batidam lamented.

His comment comes on the back of the latest Corruption Perception Index released Wednesday in which Ghana scored 40 as against last year’s score of 43 – dropping 11 places in the latest CPI. The Ranking is Ghana’s worst performance in the last six years.

Mr. Batidam, who is on the African Union Advisory Board on Corruption, bemoaned the country’s steady progress in fighting corruption which is now sliding backwards again.

‘From what I am seeing now, I can say that in Ghana now, the perception of corruption is a reality…this gov’t has not done much to its credit when it comes to the fight against corruption. President Nana Akufo-Addo will have to sit up…his government is doing nothing to fight corruption,’ he told Francis Abban on Morning Starr.

Some of the government’s appointees are alleged to have engaged in corruption in their line of duties.

Ghana, dropped three points from its 2016 score of 43 to 40 in 2017 and ranked 81 out of the total of 180 countries.

Cumulatively, Ghana has dropped eight points since 2016, the CPI, was released on Wednesday, February 21 by Transparency International.

The CPI score, indicates the perceived level of public sector corruption on a scale of zero (being highly corrupt) to 100 (very clean).

Executive Director of the Ghana Integrity Initiative, Linda Ofori- Kwafo, said Ghana’s poor score in 2017 was a reflection of inadequate investigations, prosecutions and sanctioning of corrupt officials.

Presenting the report, she said Ghana performed “not too good” adding “since the CPI became comparable from the period 2012 to now, this is the worst performance that Ghana has had. This year, 2017 CPI, we are saying Ghana’s performance from 2012 is the worst so far.”



She was, however, optimistic the situation could improve in the next three years by which time the various government interventions put in place to check corruption in the public sector would have started yielding results.

The newly created Office of the Special Prosecutor, the paperless port system and the Ghana Post digital addressing system, were some of the initiatives she observed could help Ghana shore up its ranking

“When we are able to get the gains of the new initiatives; the paperless port, the digital addressing system and the powers of the Auditor General to do the disallowance and surcharging and then office of the special prosecutor that has come on board…if all these initiatives work very well for us, we’re hoping that in a year, two years, three years to come, we should see a rise in Ghana’s CPI,” she expressed.

Generally, the 2017 CPI, showed majority of countries were making little or no progress in ending corruption.

It also showed journalists and activists in corrupt countries were risking their lives daily in an effort to speak out against corruption.



New Zealand and Denmark, ranked highest with scores of 89 and 88 respectively while Syria, South Sudan and Somalia rank lowest with scores of 14, 12 and 9 respectively.

Western Europe was identified as the best performing region with an average score of 66 with the worst performing regions being Sub-Saharan Africa (with an average score of 32) and Eastern Europe and Central Asia (with an average score of 34).