John Agyekum Kufuor, President of the Republic of Ghana, is reported to have said that Ghana has decided to wean itself from budgetary support from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) with effect from the next budget, which is expected to be presented in December this year.
According to the report in the ?Daily Graphic? of Friday, September 9, 2005, the President said the resolve to be financially independent means that Ghana will no longer be troubled by conditionalities from the IMF.
It is therefore false for the President to say that Ghana is weaning itself from the IMF budgetary support with effect from the next budget, which is expected to be presented in December this year [See Box].
The Ghana IMF official also explained that getting off IMF budgetary support has serious management consequences for the economy. According to him, once a country is on an IMF programme, a clean bill of health given by the IMF is a trigger for the release of resources from both bilateral and multi-lateral sources.
In the absence of such a programme, the country will have to assure each and very development partner separately that its books are in order and that its economy is healthy.
Thus instead of dealing with one IMF Mission to make a determination of a green light for the Ghanaian economy which all development partners will accept, Ghana will now have to be dealing with separate teams from Italy, Japan, USA, Canada, Germany, World Bank, France, and so on.
In effect, Ghana will have to deal with conditionalities from each of her development partbners instead of the IMF
The effect this will have on the time management of the officials of the Ministry of Finance and Economic Planning is better imagined than described.
Then there is the matter of economic and financial discipline. One advantage for developing countries, which run IMF programmes, according to the IMF official, is that they are not allowed a laissez-faire approach to the management of the economy. Strict economic discipline is insisted on, sometimes at great political cost to the incumbent Government.
The temptations for Governments to allow slippages, especially when the Government comes under intense social pressure such as agitation for wage increases, pressure for political reforms, industrial actions, cat-call strikes, etc, is always very great and many governments of developing countries succumb to those pressures in the absence of the discipline induced by IMF programmes.
That is when you get the phenomena of excessive currency printing, governmental free-spending, and economic favouritism ? phenomena that wrecked the Kutu Acheampong Government in Ghana in the 1970s, the IMF official added.
The IMF official was of the view that this was what Senior Minister J. H. Mensah was alluding to when he expressed the hope that Ghanaians would have the ?political stamina and managerial capability? to maintain the new economic dispensation.
* The 2005 Article IV consultation and third review under the Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility (PRGF) arrangement discussions were held in Accra during March 29-April 14, 2005. Ghana?s economic team was led by Finance and Economic Planning Deputy Minister A. Akoto-Osei, and the mission met with Senior Minister J. H. Mensah, Finance and Economic Planning Minister K. Baah-Wiredu, Bank of Ghana Governor P. Acquah, and other ministers. The mission met with H.E. President Kufuor to review developments, and with representatives of the private sector and nongovernmental organizations.
* The staff team comprised Messrs. Itam (head), Maehle, York, Ms. Chiovakul (EP), Mrs Ellis (staff assistant) (all AFR), Mr Kinoshita (FAD), and Mr Zhan (PDR), and was assisted by Mrs. Muttardy (Resident Representative). The mission liaised with teams from the World Bank and the Multi-Donor Budget Support Group.
* Ghana?s three-year PRGF arrangement was approved on May 9, 2003 in the amount of SDR 184.5 million (50) per cent of quota). The second review of the programme was completed on July 9, 2004 and, at that time, Ghana reached the completion point under the enhanced Heavily Indebted Poor Countries Initiative. Upon completion of the third review, Ghana will be eligible to draw an amount equivalent to SDR 26.35 million (7.1 per cent of quota). Ghana is requesting waivers for the nonobservance of three quantitative and one structural performance criteria. Also, the authorities are requesting a six-month extension of the current PRGF arrangement to October 31, 2006, so that the sixth and final review (based on June 2006 test date) and all disbursements under the arrangement could be completed.
* Ghana maintains a managed floating exchange rate regime, with no pre-announced path for the exchange rate. Ghana has accepted the obligations under Article VIII, Sections 2(a), 3, and 4 of the Fund?s Articles of Agreement.
* President Kufuor was reelected for a second term in December 2004, and his party increased its parliamentary majority.
* Ghana?s relations with the Fund are summarized in Appendix I, IMF-World bank collaboration and Ghana?s financial relations with the World Bank Group in Appendix II, and statistical issues in Appendix III. This report is accompanied by a Letter of Intent, with attached Memorandum of Economic and Financial Policies for 2005 and Technical Memorandum of Understanding (www.imf.org), and a statistical Appendix.
* The authorities have agreed to publish the staff report, Letter of Intent, and the Statistical Appendix. The principal authors of the report are Samuel Itam and Robert York.