Nana Addo Exposed

…as a lawless man, story of how he destroyed a life revealed

…judiciary covered his lawlessness

…OYA says his daughter, Gyankoma, takes after him

By Aaron Okyere

The Leader and Founder of the Organised Youth in Ashanti (OYA), Mr Brogya Genfi has

exposed NPP flag bearer, Nana Akufo-Addo as a lawless man “who lacks the moral and

character authority” to rule Ghana.

“Arguably, Nana Addo is the only Presidential candidate who lacks the moral and

character authority to have contested for the highest office in Ghana,” Mr Genfi

said in an article, a copy of which is in the possession of the Daily Post.

He says it is for this reason that his supporters “… feel uneasy when there is the

mention of Nana Addo’s character just as an old woman feels uneasy by the mention of

dry bones”

In the piece, while explaining how the 2008 defeated flag bearer’s disregard for the

law led to the destruction of an innocent life, he also exposed how the judiciary

covered up for him.

According to the OYA Founder, the New Patriotic Party (NPP) Presidential Candidate

for 2012 is a lawless and ruthless person, who, at age 23, negligently drove and

crashed an uninsured car belonging to his mother into the car of one Woledzi, a

41-year-old Mails Supervisor of then P&T Corporation.

Mr. Genfi said the case is reported in the Ghana Law Reports as WOLEDZI V.AKUFO-ADDO

[1982-83] part 1 – GLR 421.

The facts, according to him, as contained in the GLR 421, are that on January 14,

1967, Nana Akufo-Addo negligently drove an uninsured car into the car of one Mr.

Woledzi, a 41-year-old employee of P&T Corporation.

Mr. Woledzi was in comma for three weeks, after which he was hospitalized for six

months.

In September 1967, Mr. Woledzi sued Nana Akufo-Addo. The case was first heard by

Justice Anterkyi but after taking two witnesses, the judge decided not to continue

with proceedings.

After several adjournments, the case was finally heard by Justice Charles Crabbe who

in 1969 dismissed Mr. Woledzi’s claim. Mr. Woeledzi entered an appeal but it could

not be heard because the entire record book containing the record of proceedings

went missing. The Court of Appeals therefore ordered the case to be tried again.

Mr. Ghenfi believes that Akufo Addo escaped justice thanks to the fact that the

National Liberation Council, NLC, which belongs to the Busia-Danquah lineage, was

the government of the day. Furthermore, his father, Edward Akufo-Addo, was then the

Chief Justice and thus the one who appointed judges to cases.

In 1980 (13 years after the incident), the case came for re-trial before the late

Mrs. Justice Cecilia Koranteng-Addow whose description (below) of Mr. Woledzi’s

state at the time of the trial shows the extent to which the NPP flag bearer’s

lawlessness, carelessness and recklessness had destroyed an innocent life.

“…the plaintiff is a different person from what he was before the accident. His

appearance is terrible; his mouth is twisted to one side and it droops. This was

caused by the loss of sensitivity on the right side of the face. His eyes are so

pronounced with a squint and he walks gingerly without co-ordinating his limbs. He

moves as if he is going to trip at any moment. He still continues to take treatment

for the after effect…”

According to Mr. Ghenfi, the lawyer who defended Akufo-Addo, James Amoako-Glover

came from the Nana Akufo-Addo Law Chambers. He was once associated with drugs and

has become a mental case.

The Leader of OYA concluded that the recent accident involving Gyankoma, a daughter

of Nana Akufo-Addo is a character inherited from her father and lends credence to

the age-old Akan adage that “SE AKWADAA ANSE ONI A, WOSE OSE” to wit “if a child

does not copy the character of his/her mother, s/he copies that of the father”

Gyankoma, in the early hours of Saturday, August 21, 2010, while returning from a

night club with friends ran her Toyota Land Cruiser with registration number ER 8104

Z into the Mercedes Benz of Paa Kwesi Amissah-Arthur, the Governor of the Bank of

Ghana.

The 32-year old Gyankoma, who later pleaded guilty to drink driving tested 0.66 per

cent on the Breathalyzer, far above the legally allowed limit of 0.08 per cent when

a test was conducted on her by the Police to ascertain the level of alcohol in her

system.

Below is the unedited full text of the five-page article, titled, “Nana Akufo-Addo

and Gyankoma Akufo-Addo; Like Father, Like Daughter?” please read on:

NANA AKUFO ADDO AND GYANKROMA AKUFO-ADDO; LIKE FATHER, LIKE DAUGHTER?

There is an Akan saying that goes like “SE AKWADAA ANSE ONI A, WOSE OSE” to wit “if

a child does not copy the character of his/her mother, s/he copies that of the

father”

Gyankroma Akufo-Addo may be a living manifest to the above old age adage.

The BIG question will then be; IS GYANKROMA DISPLAYING THE CHARACTER OF HER MOTHER

OR HER ‘POPULAR’ FATHER – NANA ADDO DANKWA AKUFO-ADDO (the twice failed presidential

hopeful of the NPP)?

The answer to the question can best be answered by you, but, my duty will only be to

give you some facts so that you can easily arrive at an answer.

The Media Analyst Group (MAG) of the NDC has made the news in the past weeks

touching on the character of Nana Akufo-Addo.

Some of the issues flagged by MAG borders on the drug record of the NPP man and his

daughter’s hit and run saga.

If what I have been told is anything to rely on, then, Dr. Arthur Kennedy’s

purported explanation that Nana Addo used to do drugs but has stopped should put an

end to the COCAINE PAST of the ‘tall and humble’ desperate presidential hopeful.

The NPP is well aware and conscious of the fact that the product they have produced

for election 2012 market is bad and distasteful in terms of character. Arguably,

Nana Addo is the only presidential candidate who lacks the moral and character

authority to have contested for the highest office in Ghana. This, the NPP can not

deny.

They feel uneasy when there is the mention of Nana Addo’s character just as an old

woman feels uneasy by the mention of dry bones.

The NPP has therefore adopted a shameful and embarrassing strategy – to become

maudlin when Nana Addo’s character becomes an issue of public discussion.

They now say that the discussion of Nana Addo’s character amounts to INSULTS………….

INSULTS MY FOOT!!!

And who indicated their readiness to discern into the gutter? Was it Ausler (his

baby), K. Kwarteng (his next parliamentary candidate for Obuasi), or Ayisi the

petrol man (who now wants favour after following Aliu Mahama). Well, I am already

seated but unfortunately for them, I do not call it gutter to gutter ………. I call it

a healthy exercise for Ghanaians to know who we are all voting to rule over us and

the OIL MONEY. That’s why I will always engage in this healthy exercise; they may

call it gutter to gutter or whatever…..

Why, were we not told that Her Excellency Nana Konadu Agyemang Rawlings was not the

mother of the children she carried for nine months in her womb?

Haven’t we been told repeatedly how President Rawlings got plane seats into his

sitting room?

Ah! Did we not hear from year 2000 that President Mills never had a child?

Was Chief Kufour not a trouble for his father when he fronted the corrupt hotel

deal? What about Aliu Mahama and his KNUST spoilt child?

For Christ sake, who is Akufo-Addo to escape the troubles of his spoilt child

especially at a time he wants to be president and give some directions of a sort to

Ghanaians.

Yes, this reminds me; where is the son of Apenteng Appiah Menka (Chairman of the

council of elders – NPP Ashanti) who was arrested for swallowing pellets of cocaine

and was admitted to the Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital (KATH) for surgery?

Now back to my earlier question of ‘who Gyankroma is emulating? Kindly observe the

facts as I present and compare for an easy answer.

Did you hear that Mrs. Rebecca Akufo-Addo said on T.V in 2008 that she met her

husband at the nite club?

Gyankroma as reported, was on her way from a nite club when she had the accident;

did she under-go any training from the father about how to club? OR, as a 33yr old

matured lady, she is simply learning from the foot prints of her father.

Nana Akufo-Addo had an accident with an uninsured vehicle belonging to his mother at

age 23. There was a suspicion that he had enough alcohol in his system to have

caused the accident at the time.

Is it not a fact that the police tested alcohol in Gyankroma at the time of her

accident?

My friends (including enemies), please don’t doubt me. It is indeed a fact that the

POWDER (COKE) man had an accident with an uninsured car belonging to his mother at

age 23. The case is reported in the Ghana Law Reports as WOLEDZI V. AKUFO-ADDO

[1982-83] part 1 – GLR 421.

THE FACTS

On 14 January 1967, Nana Akufo-Addo negligently drove an uninsured car into the car

of one Mr. Woledzi, a 41year old Mails Supervisor of the then P&T Corporation.

Mr. Woledzi was in comma for 3weeks. After which he was hospitalized for 6months.

In September 1967, Mr. Woledzi sued Nana Addo. The case was first heard by Justice

Anterkyi but after taking two witnesses, the Judge decided not to continue with

proceedings.

After several adjournments, the case was finally heard by Justice Charles Crabbe who

in 1969 dismissed Mr. Woledzi’s claim.

Reminder; Lt. Gen. J. A. Ankrah was then the Chairman of the NLC and Head of State

(February 24, 1966 – April 3, 1969) – the UP lineage. Does the name Crabbe ring a

bell?

The plaintiff (Mr. Woledzi) entered an appeal but mysteriously the entire record

book containing the record of proceedings of the case was missing. The court of

appeal therefore ruled that the case should be re-tried.

Reminder; Nana Akufo-Addo’s father, Edward Akufo-Addo was the Chief Justice (1966 –

1970) and later became the ceremonial President in August 1970. He was responsible

for appointing all judges who sat on the case at the time.

In 1980 (13years after the incident), the case came for re-trial before Mrs. Justice

Cecilia Koranteng-Addow of blessed memory (she was of the 3 judges murdered in 1982

in the early days of the Revolution).

This is how Mrs. Justice Koranteng-Addow described the state of Mr. Woledzi at the

time of the trial;

“….the plaintiff is a different person from what he was before the accident. His

appearance is terrible; his mouth is twisted to one side and it droops. This was

caused by the loss of sensitivity on the right side of the face. His eyes are so

pronounced with a squint and he walks gingerly without co-ordinating his limbs. He

moves as if he is going to trip at any moment. He still continues to take treatment

for the after effect…….”

Nana Akufo-Addo was defended by one James Amoako-Glover, a lawyer in Nana

Akufo-Addo’s Law Chambers at the time. (This lawyer, am told, was once associated

with drugs and has become a mental case. Unconfirmed information indicates that he

relates one Glover who is a member of Nana Addo’s current team)

From the facts produced, Gyankroma Akufo-Addo is obviously not copying the character

of her mother.

I am also not supposed to tell you who she is emulating so just inform yourself and

answer in your household.

I guess I have not insulted anybody in this article…….

Thanks for your time.

BROGYA GENFI

FOUNDER; ORGANISED YOUTH IN ASHANTI