GhanaWeb TV




White Paper has no legal effect on adversarial findings – Foh-Amoaning

Mr  Moses Foh Amoaning Legal practitioner, Moses Foh-Amoaning

Sun, 22 Sep 2019 Source:

Renowned legal practitioner Moses Foh-Amoaning has said the government’s White Paper on the recommendations of the Short Commission will not have any legal impact on the adversarial recommendation.

It comes in the wake of the criticisms that have heralded the White Paper which appears to reject many of the key findings.

The White Paper primarily said the commission failed to achieve their core terms of reference.

The government position among other things rejected the recommendation of the commission which said the individual who assaulted Ningo Prampram MP Sam George should be prosecuted.

The White Paper also rejected the recommendation which said minister of state at the national security should be reprimanded.

Speaking to Starr News, Mr. Foh-Amoaning said the adverse recommendation can only be challenged at the court of law.

"The White paper has no legal effect on adversarial recommendations. Only a court of law can decide on those matters,” he said.

Also, security analyst Dr. Kwesi Aning has described the White paper as worrying.

“In layman’s English, the government is saying that if these were to be an examination question, then members of the commission deviated from answering the question."

“That the report does not represent or does not provide faithful representation of the causes leading to the Ayawaso crisis. If we are to accept this interpretation, then there is a fundamental problem, that we need to go back to the drawing board."

“Government said that there was fundamental deviation so everything else that the report says, they will reject it. But doing that as it may, I think it is unfortunate because the whole world watched the discern responses from what ought to have been a coherent set of institutions at pulling in the same direction.

“So to reject that recommendation, once more in terms of command and control and the oversight, who has oversight responsibilities and where the bud stops, doesn’t contribute to creating a system that is answerable to Parliament,” he said.

Related Articles: