4

Read Comments Comments (4)

• Supervisor General 7 months ago

  This is a healthy debate between Dzamefe and Bartels-Kojo. I lean to Bartels-Kojo's side. The games played by the lawyers and the investigators are formidable.

  This is a healthy debate between Dzamefe and Bartels-Kojo. I lean to Bartels-Kojo's side. The games played by the lawyers and the investigators are formidable.

  reply
• Psd 7 months ago

  I believe they complement each other. One says " creating more courtroom without comprehensive reform would not solve the problem of delay". The other says "expanding court infrastructure plus technological upgrade" will help ...
  read full comment

  I believe they complement each other. One says " creating more courtroom without comprehensive reform would not solve the problem of delay". The other says "expanding court infrastructure plus technological upgrade" will help solve the issue.

  reply
• Kwesi Busumbru 7 months ago

  Every police headquarters and municipal assembly should have a court house. Just like they do in America and other G7 countries, for Misdemeanor and traffic offenses. This will help to speed up the judicial bottle necks.

  Every police headquarters and municipal assembly should have a court house. Just like they do in America and other G7 countries, for Misdemeanor and traffic offenses. This will help to speed up the judicial bottle necks.

  reply
• Yaw 7 months ago

  If one judge can finish 50 out of 100 cases before him, another court is added and the other 50 given to the new court, common sense dictates the possibility of the two doing more than just 50. Creating more courts lessen the ...
  read full comment

  If one judge can finish 50 out of 100 cases before him, another court is added and the other 50 given to the new court, common sense dictates the possibility of the two doing more than just 50. Creating more courts lessen the burden on one court and more cases get finished faster.

  reply