12

Read Comments Comments (12)

• P Djamgbe 2 months ago

  Fraudulent man, you "saw jets" and you just jump to conclusion that attacks on the US might happen? Hasn't it occurred to you that the US security apparatus around the games might include scrambling military jets to deter any ...
  read full comment

  Fraudulent man, you "saw jets" and you just jump to conclusion that attacks on the US might happen? Hasn't it occurred to you that the US security apparatus around the games might include scrambling military jets to deter any potential threats?

  reply
• Yaa Yaa: Come again, NG 2 months ago

  Nigel Gaisie , redefining “finals” after the fact is intellectually dishonest
  The term “finals” has a universally understood meaning
  In football—especially a tournament as globally standardized as the FIFA World ...
  read full comment

  Nigel Gaisie , redefining “finals” after the fact is intellectually dishonest
  The term “finals” has a universally understood meaning
  In football—especially a tournament as globally standardized as the FIFA World Cup—the word “finals” refers to the final match that decides the champion, not quarterfinals or semifinals.
  This is not a cultural or spiritual definition; it is a technical and universally accepted sporting term.
  Redefining it later is not clarification; it is revision.
  Point: When language is clear, redefining it after events unfold is an insult to public intelligence.
  Post-event reinterpretation destroys the credibility of prophecy
  A prophecy, by nature, must be:
  Clear before the event
  Testable by outcome
  Consistent in meaning
  When someone waits for the outcome and then adjusts the meaning of their words, it becomes retroactive justification, not prophecy.
  Point: Any statement that can be reshaped to fit any outcome is not divine insight—it is wordplay.
  Ambiguity after failure is a classic manipulation tactic
  Saying “I meant quarterfinals or semifinals” only after elimination follows a known pattern:
  Make a bold claim
  Outcome fails
  Redefine terms
  Claim success anyway
  This tactic removes accountability and ensures the speaker is never wrong.
  Point: If a prophecy cannot fail, it is not prophecy—it is insurance.
  Intelligence demands consistency, not spiritual gymnastics
  If “every stage is a final,” then:
  The group stage is a final
  Every match is a final
  The word “final” becomes meaningless
  Point: When words lose fixed meaning, truth collapses. Faith does not require the suspension of reason.
  God is not the author of confusion
  Scripture itself states that God does not operate in confusion or contradiction.
  Point: When a message causes widespread confusion and requires constant explanation, the problem is not with the audience—it is with the message.
  Why this behavior is dangerous to faith and society
  a. It trivializes God’s voice
  Attributing unclear, failed, or manipulated statements to God:
  Reduces God to a public relations shield
  Turns divine authority into a tool for personal reputation management
  Point: God’s name should not be used to protect human error.
  b. It conditions people to accept nonsense as “spiritual depth”
  When followers are told that obvious inconsistencies are “deep spiritual meanings”, critical thinking is discouraged.
  Point: Faith that fears questions is not faith—it is control.
  c. It damages the credibility of genuine ministry
  False or careless prophetic claims make the public skeptical of:
  Genuine pastors
  Authentic spiritual leadership
  Christianity as a whole
  Point: Reckless prophecy creates mockery, not reverence.
  3. Qualities expected of a true man of God
  a. Humility to admit error
  A true man of God can say:
  “I was wrong. I spoke in error. I take responsibility.”
  Point: Accountability is not weakness; it is spiritual maturity.
  b. Clarity, not cleverness
  A true man of God speaks plainly, not in ways that require later reinterpretation.
  Point: God’s truth does not need verbal gymnastics to survive.
  c. Integrity over image
  A true servant of God protects:
  Truth over popularity
  Integrity over ego
  God’s name over personal brand
  Point: Any ministry that cannot survive honesty is already compromised.
  d. Respect for people’s intelligence
  Spiritual leadership is not about dazzling people but guiding them responsibly.
  Point: Talking down to people or gaslighting them spiritually is abuse, not ministry.
  e. Accountability to both God and people
  Biblically, prophets were:
  Judged by accuracy
  Held accountable by the community
  Willing to face consequences
  Point: Authority without accountability is tyranny, even in religion.
  “Faith does not mean abandoning reason. God does not require us to switch off our brains in order to believe. When spiritual language is used to excuse obvious failure, it is not prophecy—it is deception dressed in religion.”

  reply
• kk 2 months ago

  Why bring upon yourself such STRESS? Is any one forcing you to prophesy?
  Again why all your prohesies seanonal? Seek your own salvation and stay away from this NONSENSEyou continue to spew as PROHESIES.

  Why bring upon yourself such STRESS? Is any one forcing you to prophesy?
  Again why all your prohesies seanonal? Seek your own salvation and stay away from this NONSENSEyou continue to spew as PROHESIES.

  reply
• Brown 2 months ago

  Hahahaaa NG go explain taya as noone is paying attention to such confident tricksters

  Hahahaaa NG go explain taya as noone is paying attention to such confident tricksters

  reply
• Justrac Africa LTD 2 months ago

  Website could help you get more customers and look more professional. At Justrac Africa we build clean, quality websites for small businesses like yours. Cost:1,500Gh. Domain, hosting & designing. Call/WhatsApp: 0501796870 Hy ...
  read full comment

  Website could help you get more customers and look more professional. At Justrac Africa we build clean, quality websites for small businesses like yours. Cost:1,500Gh. Domain, hosting & designing. Call/WhatsApp: 0501796870 Hyyssvwv

  reply
• AMAK 2 months ago

  This womanizer is just crazy

  This womanizer is just crazy

  reply
• Joseph the Truth Teller 2 months ago

  kwashia. So if it happened, he will say he prophesy, if it does not he will say he prayed. We can see through these lies. You are a fool!
  
  --Jeremiah 14:14
  
  New International Version
  14 Then the Lord said to me, “The p ...
  read full comment

  kwashia. So if it happened, he will say he prophesy, if it does not he will say he prayed. We can see through these lies. You are a fool!
  
  --Jeremiah 14:14
  
  New International Version
  14 Then the Lord said to me, “The prophets are prophesying lies in my name. I have not sent them or appointed them or spoken to them. They are prophesying to you false visions, divinations, idolatries[a] and the delusions of their own minds.

  reply
• Thief of Staff - Akosua Frema 2 months ago

  The World Cup itself is referred to as a final so he was right. For example, 9 teams have qualified for the World Cup finals to be staged in America, Canada and Mexico.

  The World Cup itself is referred to as a final so he was right. For example, 9 teams have qualified for the World Cup finals to be staged in America, Canada and Mexico.

  reply
• Yaa Yaa: Come again, NG 2 months ago

  1. “Final” has a precise sporting meaning
  In football, the final is one specific match that determines the champion.
  Calling the entire tournament a “final” contradicts standard football terminology used by FIFA, CA ...
  read full comment

  1. “Final” has a precise sporting meaning
  In football, the final is one specific match that determines the champion.
  Calling the entire tournament a “final” contradicts standard football terminology used by FIFA, CAF, UEFA, and broadcasters worldwide.
  2. FIFA itself distinguishes between “tournament” and “final match”
  FIFA refers to the event as the “FIFA World Cup” or “World Cup tournament.”
  The last match is officially called “The World Cup Final.”
  If the whole competition were a “final,” FIFA would not need a separate term for the last match.
  3. “World Cup finals” is a plural, administrative phrase — not a football definition
  The phrase “World Cup finals” is shorthand used to distinguish the tournament phase from qualifiers.
  It does not redefine the meaning of final in football.
  Example: “Qualified for the World Cup finals” ≠ “qualified for the final match.”
  This is linguistic convenience, not technical accuracy.
  4. By their logic, every match becomes a final — which is absurd
  If the entire World Cup is “a final,” then:
  Group-stage matches are finals
  Round of 16 matches are finals
  Semi-finals are finals
  This destroys the competitive structure of football, which is built around progression toward a single final match.
  5. Football already has correct terms they ignored
  Correct usage:
  Qualifiers → matches to reach the tournament
  World Cup tournament → the main competition
  Final → the last match
  Using “final” for the whole tournament is lazy phrasing, not correctness.
  6. Broadcasters and commentators are expected to be precise
  Commentators are paid for clarity and accuracy.
  Defending incorrect terminology because it’s “commonly said” lowers professional standards and miseducates audiences.
  7. Nigel Gaisie’s defense relies on semantics, not football logic
  Arguing from wording instead of football structure avoids the real issue:
  Football definitions are functional, not grammatical.
  Meaning is determined by use in competition, not casual language shortcuts.
  8. Common usage does not equal correctness
  Many people say:
  “Penalty shoot” instead of “penalty kick”
  “Offside goal” (which is impossible)
  Frequency of error does not make it right.
  Conclusion
  Yes, “World Cup finals” is sometimes used administratively,
  but the World Cup is not “a final.”
  The final is one match, at the end of the tournament.
  The commentator and Nigel Gaisie were defending imprecise language, not correct football terminology.

  reply
• Yaa Yaa: Come again, NG…Addendum 2 months ago

  Calling the entire tournament “the finals” does not make Round of 16 or quarterfinal exits “final positions.” That is precisely why medals are not awarded for those stages.

  Calling the entire tournament “the finals” does not make Round of 16 or quarterfinal exits “final positions.” That is precisely why medals are not awarded for those stages.

  reply
• Fire for fire 2 months ago

  Hey, Nigel Gaisie: Stop your foolishness, okay, You are becoming an absolute embarrassment to your parents. They deserve something better than this your "idiotness"

  Hey, Nigel Gaisie: Stop your foolishness, okay, You are becoming an absolute embarrassment to your parents. They deserve something better than this your "idiotness"

  reply
• Popo 2 months ago

  Woaaaa, look at this explaination.

  Woaaaa, look at this explaination.

  reply