Dabbousi isn’t the originator of Mahama’s womanizing rumour

Read Comments Comments (24)

• ROGUE LAWYER 9 years ago

  Are you for real or been paid to do dirty damage control?, i dont want to believe you understand english more than the writer,
  if dabbousi was not claiming for the origination of what he said or wrote -
  
  what prevented hi ...
  read full comment

  Are you for real or been paid to do dirty damage control?, i dont want to believe you understand english more than the writer,
  if dabbousi was not claiming for the origination of what he said or wrote -
  
  what prevented him of given his source of information credit to Africa watch?
  besides in the Africa watch interview with prez mahama where was it mentioned that he mahama had a child with Otumfour daughter?
  
  bringing different names in his story - is defined to credit him ( Dabbousi )as the originator.
  
  it is high time in our democracy to crack the whip to those self claimed journalist or commentators to be hold accountable or responsible to their falsehood
  
  He Dabousi must defend himself with this explanation in court of law

  reply
• Philip 9 years ago

  I agree,Ghanaian women should stay clear off Mahama.

  I agree,Ghanaian women should stay clear off Mahama.

  reply
• insight to the bone 9 years ago

  It is said religion and science must go together for the welfare of mankind and i say simple plain common sense , justice and science must always walk hand in hand. Not so long ago scientist using DNA analysis were able to pr ...
  read full comment

  It is said religion and science must go together for the welfare of mankind and i say simple plain common sense , justice and science must always walk hand in hand. Not so long ago scientist using DNA analysis were able to prove the DNA of the Pharaohs of Egypt was identical to that of the sub Saharan people of Akan and also they practiced the culture and tradition of Matriarchy which plainly proves Akan are the true chosen people which we all already knew. The blue print for nation building as designed by God for every nation is in the Bible and recommends we dont mix with the philistines or other wicked people such as pepeni/ayigbe Sodom / Gomorrah least we suffer the fire and brimstone of retrogression , nor should we worship their golden calf of islam that can only bring bad-luck to our efforts of modernization and development. We all know the true reason why Acheampong and others were killed because knowing this they had begun the process of separating our blessed people from the menace of the ayigbe and later on the pepeni criminals. Seeing that they would loose their bread basket of free money they decided kill and brainwah the minds of our people with a FAKE revolution as the best way to hide a crime is to do it in the open . Corruption is now in the open and fools ignore this wickedness saying everyone is corrupt yet they piss in their pants at the thought the outsider Nana coming in. We have the law of the country hijacked by constitution written by minorities to ensure justice and freedom for the Akans can never be regained except by war. We have a govt which effectively denies the majority Akan true participation in the processes of a govt by the people and of the people since 70% of all appointees are pepeni northerners who hide behind their incompetence to ensure their true agenda of the devastation of the Akan economy. We have had Pharaohs, kings , paramount chiefs and all kinds system of state organizations through the millennia and now its time to get rid of all these useless Judas Iscariot traitor chiefs and their 30 pieces of V8 treachery that burden us and create a true modern state based on the positive experiences of progressive nations , so its now time for true democracy born in the blood of war as has been the case of all prosperous nations. Nobody can hide the true light and destiny of God's chosen people the Akan no matter the skinpain envy of the useless wicked idiots around and within us .We charge you to investigate the truth for yourselves and not be swayed by the noise , lies of the brainwashing propaganda as they only lead to doom and disgrace. Rather enter the light of wisdom , justice and freedom if not for yourselves but for future generations .We recognize the truth only because God put it in our hearts even before we are born . Do not allow fear to be your guide but rather have God in your heart and be courageous to fight even in the bloodiest of wars as no matter what we shall be victorious. Do not turn away or be blinded by the darkness of the evil , God has ordain we be a nation so arise with the clarion call for battle and do not allow them to finish the process of making us slaves in our own promised land of milk and honey. Many of you here are witnesses to the threats of their juju men and their national security forces who promised to destroy , kill or arrest me for speaking the truth but this whispering voice in the wilderness of pepeni/ayigbe corruption , wickedness and evil can not be silenced but rather grows louder . Yes we shall fight them in the hills and valleys but will never surrender as thousands will see the truth and join the battle for true freedom . we are all witnesses to thew fact that for over 50 years starting with Kotoka and followed by JJ's revolution we see there is not a single prosperous or wise Akan family of intelligentsia that has not suffered , or been persecuted leading to the dispensation or exodus of our most talented or blessed sons serving other nations in exile . The spawn of Satan following this ndc have secured the theft and think they will succeed in denying the will of God through the people in a peaceful ballot but we know they do not know God is with us and they will be booted out no matter what , we prepare not for elections but for the freedom fight of war

  reply
• kweku trouble 9 years ago

  Total nonsense and absolute lies. Give us sources of your claims.

  Total nonsense and absolute lies. Give us sources of your claims.

  reply
• Joyce 9 years ago

  Hmmm, you are indeed a rogue lawyer.

  Hmmm, you are indeed a rogue lawyer.

  reply
• Post Office. 9 years ago

  Badu. There is nothing that is private in life. According to Professor Angela Davies: The personal is political. (See her autobiography). Leaders must set examples. Good luck Ghana.

  Badu. There is nothing that is private in life. According to Professor Angela Davies: The personal is political. (See her autobiography). Leaders must set examples. Good luck Ghana.

  reply
• Joyce 9 years ago

  Mahama's apologists are funny old fools.

  Mahama's apologists are funny old fools.

  reply
• George Boateng 9 years ago

  So so so succinct.

  So so so succinct.

  reply
• Abeeku Mensah 9 years ago

  Africa watch did not state anywhere in its infamous article, you referenced, that the president confirmed or admitted to having concubines in waiting. Furthermore if you Nr. K. Badu had the slightest inkling what logical thin ...
  read full comment

  Africa watch did not state anywhere in its infamous article, you referenced, that the president confirmed or admitted to having concubines in waiting. Furthermore if you Nr. K. Badu had the slightest inkling what logical thinking processes are you would know that admitting to a set of facts does not make fabrications thereafter become factual. The NPP, of which you are a card carrying member, will stoop to gutter level politics and go to any length to have a picture of Mahama and any of the women as proof yet we continue to wait in vain don't we?
  
  What Dabbousi is doing is just taking advantage of a Ghana where love of country is for sale and every stooge will say and do anything for a buck. We have sat in Ghana and allowed poverty to derail common sense in society. How many Ghanaians do you think can go to Lebanon and engage in Dabbousi type of politics and live to dance around?

  reply
• Kwame 9 years ago

  Polygamy is not a crime in Ghana thus a woman even with official marriage can decide that the husband should have another woman in his life, though to some of us that means cheating. The matter here is that the woman can not ...
  read full comment

  Polygamy is not a crime in Ghana thus a woman even with official marriage can decide that the husband should have another woman in his life, though to some of us that means cheating. The matter here is that the woman can not have more than one man, but the man can have more than one woman.
  With all respect and sanity no citizen of a village or town goes to public and shout that the womanizer in the village or town is having an affair with the wife or daughter of the chief knowing well that it is a fiction of his rumor selling mouth.
  I wrote on this forum once that a Ghanaian lawyer was happy that a Lebanese took the wife of a Ghanaian from him. I am not sure if a Ghanaian can make suck fiction of wishful mind rumor in Lebanon and still be alive or take the wife of a Lebanese from him and have his peace, even in Ghana.

  reply
• Jo 9 years ago

  What nonsense! How can you justify President Mahama's immoral act? He is the president of Ghana and must therefore seek to set a good example.

  What nonsense! How can you justify President Mahama's immoral act? He is the president of Ghana and must therefore seek to set a good example.

  reply
• kweku trouble 9 years ago

  Which immoral act are you talking about? Do you have any proof? Stop being a fool.

  Which immoral act are you talking about? Do you have any proof? Stop being a fool.

  reply
• Jo 9 years ago

  The immoral act is Mahama's own admission of having had numerous children outside his marriage. Mahama spoke openly to the editor of Africawatch. A president should never behave like that. I also agree with the author that a ...
  read full comment

  The immoral act is Mahama's own admission of having had numerous children outside his marriage. Mahama spoke openly to the editor of Africawatch. A president should never behave like that. I also agree with the author that a womanizer could be a potential thief.

  reply
• Sam 9 years ago

  Our penal code states what an ordinary Ghanaian or our president can or cannot do. Having a lot of kids or concubines is not one of them. Fadi, has proved to be a proper "Scum of the Earth".

  Our penal code states what an ordinary Ghanaian or our president can or cannot do. Having a lot of kids or concubines is not one of them. Fadi, has proved to be a proper "Scum of the Earth".

  reply
• Joy 9 years ago

  You are not a womanizer? Are you? Just asking. Aside from the penal code, morality is also an X factor. Leaders must set a good example.

  You are not a womanizer? Are you? Just asking. Aside from the penal code, morality is also an X factor. Leaders must set a good example.

  reply
• SIMPLE TRUTH 9 years ago

  The ec is from Nigeria not GHANA.

  The ec is from Nigeria not GHANA.

  reply
• Ghana First 9 years ago

  K. Badu is as stupid as the Lebanese Fadi. HOW COULD TRUE GHANAIN BE HAPPY BECAUSE A LEBANESE COCKROAH HAS INSULTED THE PRESUDENT OF GHANA?.

  K. Badu is as stupid as the Lebanese Fadi. HOW COULD TRUE GHANAIN BE HAPPY BECAUSE A LEBANESE COCKROAH HAS INSULTED THE PRESUDENT OF GHANA?.

  reply
• Jo 9 years ago

  That BNI must invite that Malory for leaking Mahama's secret.

  That BNI must invite that Malory for leaking Mahama's secret.

  reply
• G. K. Berko 9 years ago

  It seems like Badu is judging the President by a conveniently selective set of moral tenets that our Constitution does not necessarily demand any President to abide by.
  
  As much as we all agree that our persistent efforts ...
  read full comment

  It seems like Badu is judging the President by a conveniently selective set of moral tenets that our Constitution does not necessarily demand any President to abide by.
  
  As much as we all agree that our persistent efforts for Ghana to be seen, and admitted into the 'elite' modern group of Nations, as a progressive Capitalist Democracy, we would have to shed some of our old customs or parts of our Culture over time to be more acceptable by the other members of the group, we are yet to make that leap.
  
  Furthermore, we don't yet have a Constitution that stipulates the unacceptability of a person who may be a womanizer as a President. Even the ethical standards of our Parliament hardly touch on that topic.
  
  So, this charge against the President of being a Philanderer largely falls into the category of attacking his personal character to make him more unacceptable to those among us who would wish we had such restrictions encoded in our Constitution. These are folks who tend to impose their restrictive moral or religious beliefs on the rest of the Nation, without proper general referendum to make such restrictions guide our Electioneering process. Their assessment is loosely implying a relative morality between the President and their choice of favorite candidates.
  
  We have long been talking about how immoral or unacceptable womanizing is. But we have never seriously defined what is considered as such in our Society. We have a Society that still embraces Polygamy. We do not hear folks condemning their Fathers, Mothers and their not-so-distant ancestors for being polygamous, even if they themselves, now, think about it as some inappropriate human behavior.
  
  Yet, these folks would not waste time to decry the President's perceived fallibility as having ever being polygamous, or attempting to be. To such folks of self-appointed moral Judges, only their set of morals count.
  
  We all know how massively ubiquitous our males' dating practice has been without fidelity to the present. Even Badu himself could, at best, be among the few exceptions to that practice until probably coupling the marital chain to some lady. Would he then claim that he is morally superior to the President? Could Badu say that all who are not legally married are exempted from that womanizing criteria he is espousing?
  
  Or, he would rather have all such fallible men be excluded from ever becoming our President? It doesn't seem to matter to Badu if the President's behavior happened long time in the past, or whether he ever changed from that behavior. So, long as the President might have ever had a child outside his marriage, regardless of when that happened, Badu sees him as unfit to the President. Really?
  
  The fact that Badu and cohorts do not see anything wrong with people's actions until the latter decide to seek a certain political position, even if those actions are intrinsically harmful, exposes the former as either hypocritical or opportunistic, conveniently-selective critics.
  
  Has Badu ever asked Akufo-Addo if he has ever cheated on his wife, or spread his sperms around among other women before marriage? Has he ever asked any of our other Presidential candidates of ever doing the same, or doing so in their lives before marriage or after taking up the challenge of seeking for Political Office?
  
  Does Badu know how many of our Traditional Leaders have more than one wife, or children by other women in wedlock, or still chase after women, even as married men? Would he wish for those Traditional Leaders relinquish their positions because of that? Or, would Badu call upon the Public to reject any future candidate for such Traditional Leadership, Chief, if we know him to have ever been a womanizer? Or, have had children outside their marriages?
  
  If we want to copy the West, especially, America, we ought to learn what works and what doesn't. When the USA GOP went after former President Clinton for his extramarital adventures, and attempted to impeach him, Clinton survived it all and even left Office with a much higher approval rate than the could have been imagined. Lessons ought to be learnt right!
  
  Long Live Ghana!!!

  reply
• KA 9 years ago

  I don't know how far some people can go to express their partisan views. For people like Badu, Mahama can NEVER do anything right.
  
  We come from a society where, traditionally, womanizing, in itself, is not regarded as a c ...
  read full comment

  I don't know how far some people can go to express their partisan views. For people like Badu, Mahama can NEVER do anything right.
  
  We come from a society where, traditionally, womanizing, in itself, is not regarded as a crime or even a moral shortcoming. We even look at womanizers as brave daring men. Of course, people can carry it too far and it is that which our tradition doesn't quite approve of.
  
  But Badu is not making a genera African morality argument. He is just seeking to score political points against Mahama in favour of Akufo-Addo, who, himself is no pillar of morality.
  
  I don't support Mahama but not because he has had extra marital affairs. I don't like Akufo-Addo either but I won't hold his extra marital affairs against him.
  
  Some people can't be trusted to make credible (impartial) political arguments. Badu is one such person.

  reply
• Idiot Mugabe 9 years ago

  You may have a valid point. Of course, womanizing cannot be limited to only married men. Having said so, you've failed to address the salient points raised by Mr Badu.
  
  First of all, is it true that a womanizer could be a p ...
  read full comment

  You may have a valid point. Of course, womanizing cannot be limited to only married men. Having said so, you've failed to address the salient points raised by Mr Badu.
  
  First of all, is it true that a womanizer could be a potential liar? Does a womanizer could resort to thievery in order to keep his habit going?
  
  I would like to agree with the author on a womanizer's lying tongue. If that was the case, would such a character as a president of the land be trustworthy?
  
  Don't you also think it is extremely important for those who seek to lead do so by setting good example? They should indeed set the trail for others to follow.
  
  Biblical invocations aside, immorality is an essential factor in leadership.

  reply
• abena 9 years ago

  Oh Mahama

  Oh Mahama

  reply
• Philip 9 years ago

  Leadership by example

  Leadership by example

  reply
• VICTOR BAIDOO, SOUTH AFRICA 9 years ago

  WHY NOT ASK CHRAJ TO INVESTIGATE THE PRESIDENT'S EXTRA MARITAL AFFAIRS? AND CHRAJ WILL CERTAINLY CLEAR HIM OF ANY WRONG DOING, AND SAY, "HE ONLY ENGAGES IN 'PROHIBITED' MARITAL AFFAIRS".

  WHY NOT ASK CHRAJ TO INVESTIGATE THE PRESIDENT'S EXTRA MARITAL AFFAIRS? AND CHRAJ WILL CERTAINLY CLEAR HIM OF ANY WRONG DOING, AND SAY, "HE ONLY ENGAGES IN 'PROHIBITED' MARITAL AFFAIRS".

  reply