PLB rejects AshantiGold venue request

Read Comments Comments (4)

• PLUMBER 12 years ago

  I am at a lost as to the true meaning of this measure of home match ban. Why not simply order the team to play at home in an empty stadium, since this wOuld deprive the offending team the support of their home fans. The home ...
  read full comment

  I am at a lost as to the true meaning of this measure of home match ban. Why not simply order the team to play at home in an empty stadium, since this wOuld deprive the offending team the support of their home fans. The home team ought to suffer, in this case Kotoko. Goldfields are being made to suffer by default, it should never be so.

  reply
• GHFUO, BE SERIOUS NOT PRIDEFUL! 12 years ago

  "We would therefore request that you honour your match at Essipon as previously scheduled. We regret any inconvenience caused as a result of this decision," the PLB said in their response to AshantiGold's request.
  
  PLB, WAT ...
  read full comment

  "We would therefore request that you honour your match at Essipon as previously scheduled. We regret any inconvenience caused as a result of this decision," the PLB said in their response to AshantiGold's request.
  
  PLB, WAT REASON DID U GIVE ASHGOLD FOR THIS INTENTIONAL BLUNDER? U ARE AIDING KOTOKO TO WIN THE LEAGUE? DISGRACEFUL!

  reply
• Siisi 12 years ago

  PLB please you know you have not given a convincing reason for this refusal. Ashgold had a genuine case in respect of the travel distance and its cost implications and all we hear from the PLB is "we regret the inconvenience. ...
  read full comment

  PLB please you know you have not given a convincing reason for this refusal. Ashgold had a genuine case in respect of the travel distance and its cost implications and all we hear from the PLB is "we regret the inconvenience..." Who's under sanctions here - Ashgold or Kotoko?

  reply
• major 12 years ago

  i pray kotoko should this league

  i pray kotoko should this league

  reply