SC reversing its decision in a review could spell doom

Read Comments Comments (11)

• PLUMBER 12 years ago

  The problem will not be the a review panel overturning the SC verdict. The problem will arise if 4 million votes are annulled. What would happen to the MPs elected? What would happen in parliament? Yes, the NPP are confaortab ...
  read full comment

  The problem will not be the a review panel overturning the SC verdict. The problem will arise if 4 million votes are annulled. What would happen to the MPs elected? What would happen in parliament? Yes, the NPP are confaortable if they have the Presidency and everything else goes haywire. They know how to manipulate and force their way through without caring about the national interest. That is where the real problem. a review that takes the national interest into account as against the parochial interest of a few die hards ought to be welcome by the vast majority of Ghanaians.

  reply
• Nana 12 years ago

  Rest assured brother, election is won through ballot box and not on the face of pink sheets. If the supreme court accepts the proposition to annul votes on the face of pink sheets there will never a president ever elected in ...
  read full comment

  Rest assured brother, election is won through ballot box and not on the face of pink sheets. If the supreme court accepts the proposition to annul votes on the face of pink sheets there will never a president ever elected in Ghana. My reason is that in subsequent elections, presiding officers who realise that the parties they support has lost massively will only resfuse to sign pink sheets knowing very well that it will be a good basis for annulling the election and politicians will surely use presiding officers to achieve this diabolic feat

  reply
• concern ghanian 12 years ago

  THE SUPREME COURT MUST STAND ON HER VERDIT.

  THE SUPREME COURT MUST STAND ON HER VERDIT.

  reply
• PEARL 12 years ago

  A RIGGED VERDICT AT THE SUPREME COURT SHOULD BE SWALLOWED BY 4 MILLION VOTERS WHEN A CLEAR VERDICT AT THE BALLOT BOX WAS CHALLENGED? IT'S AMAZING HOW SOME FOLKS THINK!!

  A RIGGED VERDICT AT THE SUPREME COURT SHOULD BE SWALLOWED BY 4 MILLION VOTERS WHEN A CLEAR VERDICT AT THE BALLOT BOX WAS CHALLENGED? IT'S AMAZING HOW SOME FOLKS THINK!!

  reply
• YAW SARFO. 12 years ago

  Mr NPP amn, the problems is your wee smoking Akufo Addo who sent this diabolical bogus case to the court in the first place.In lections,only one person wins but that is not for your useless arrogant wee smoker.He has taken th ...
  read full comment

  Mr NPP amn, the problems is your wee smoking Akufo Addo who sent this diabolical bogus case to the court in the first place.In lections,only one person wins but that is not for your useless arrogant wee smoker.He has taken this country hostage for the past nine months and sacred off investors.The verdict will surely come against him.Tell him to accept it if not he should just buy his coffin and dig his grave dowm.The problem is not with president Mahama.The problems is with your drug criminal Akufo Addo!

  reply
• TDA 12 years ago

  Put you real name, you dick-head Ewe clown!

  Put you real name, you dick-head Ewe clown!

  reply
• KILLER 12 years ago

  No judges in their rightful mind will rule this case for NPP.How can you have a trained polling agent at the polling stations and an open count in front of the general public and later comes out to say you are rubbed.

  No judges in their rightful mind will rule this case for NPP.How can you have a trained polling agent at the polling stations and an open count in front of the general public and later comes out to say you are rubbed.

  reply
• Woman's wisdom 12 years ago

  If the Supreme court is supreme then who the hell is to challenge their verdict? It would be foolish for anyone to instruct the Supreme court to review its own decision. If there was any court over and above the Supreme court ...
  read full comment

  If the Supreme court is supreme then who the hell is to challenge their verdict? It would be foolish for anyone to instruct the Supreme court to review its own decision. If there was any court over and above the Supreme court then it could have been possible. Benard Morna was talking shit when he said the supreme court's decision could be challenged. Now my question is, if the same person who ruled that NPP has won the election because Afari Gyan has admitted that he made a lot of mistakes and that is why Jon Mahama became president. If so then it would take a stupid fool to challenge such a verdict because the same person who pronounced judgment is the same one to do the review so tell me how they would change their own decision? If they do, then it means the challenge would go on and on without ending, if you know what I mean... Asiedu Nkasei is a fool.

  reply
• mohammed 12 years ago

  If a review can invalidate or change the decision why would that party loose in the first case? if a review is part of the Court process, the loosing party may exhorts its remedy prescribed by the constitution.

  If a review can invalidate or change the decision why would that party loose in the first case? if a review is part of the Court process, the loosing party may exhorts its remedy prescribed by the constitution.

  reply
• SC reversing its decision in a review 12 years ago

  I think we don't need the case to be ongoing forever. The SC decision should be final without any chance for appeal. That will enable the country to heal quickly after 8 months of court proceedings. Who wants to endure anothe ...
  read full comment

  I think we don't need the case to be ongoing forever. The SC decision should be final without any chance for appeal. That will enable the country to heal quickly after 8 months of court proceedings. Who wants to endure another 8 months or so of the same things we have heard over and over? God bless Ghana.

  reply
• Whatever 12 years ago

  You want the Supreme court to reverse the EC's decision without any doom being spelt but if it reverses it's own decision then a doom should be spelt. Really? This shows that NPP wasn't even interested in fairness and justice ...
  read full comment

  You want the Supreme court to reverse the EC's decision without any doom being spelt but if it reverses it's own decision then a doom should be spelt. Really? This shows that NPP wasn't even interested in fairness and justice in the first. They just wanted to use the judiciary as a stepping stone to do what the ballot box couldn't do for them. What NPP is doing is about subversion of the constitution.

  reply