Amidu slams Chief Justice’s decision to close courts amidst Bawku conflict

Former Special Prosecutor Martin Amidu has openly criticised Ghana’s judiciary, directing particular disapproval at the Chief Justice’s decision to close courts in Bolgatanga and nearby regions due to perceived security risks.

In Amidu’s view, this move is a troubling precedent that threatens access to justice in areas already struggling with security issues, such as Bawku. The judiciary, he argues, should uphold its responsibility to make justice accessible for all citizens, rather than “abandoning their posts at the slightest hint of trouble.”

For him, closing courts due to vague “stakeholder concerns” raises questions about transparency and accountability.

He questioned the extent of stakeholder consultation regarding the court closures, wondering if the communities affected were part of the decision-making process.

“Who exactly are these stakeholders who expressed concerns over security? Were the people of Bolgatanga consulted?” he asked, emphasizing the judiciary’s duty to protect public access to justice, especially in areas facing uncertainty.

Amidu’s concerns don’t end with the judiciary; he also sees Parliament as failing to address national priorities.

He expressed disappointment over what he views as misplaced legislative focus, particularly Parliament’s recent preoccupation with MPs intending to run as independents.

“The current focus on MPs who intend to run as independents is, frankly, misguided,” he remarked, highlighting the lack of attention to pressing national security concerns.

According to Amidu, this preoccupation with internal political matters has caused lawmakers to neglect their duty to address more urgent issues, including the judiciary’s oversight and security challenges in volatile areas like Bawku.

TWI NEWS