Supreme Court has no capacity to interfere in parliamentary procedures - Lawyer

This article is closed for comments.

Read Comments Comments (3)

Wow 1 year ago

I agree.
Are we now going to have the courts tell parliament what cases to table and how it ought to operate especially when this very event has happened before in parliament

I agree.
Are we now going to have the courts tell parliament what cases to table and how it ought to operate especially when this very event has happened before in parliament
Manni 1 year ago

Liar, have you forgotten the supreme Court has the mandate to interpret the laws made by Parliament and can even rewrite the laws by adding or taking away some aspects if there are contradictions? I don't know where you got y ...
read full comment

Liar, have you forgotten the supreme Court has the mandate to interpret the laws made by Parliament and can even rewrite the laws by adding or taking away some aspects if there are contradictions? I don't know where you got your law degree to be a lawyer or you've been bought due to your stomach? Where in the world does supreme Court not have the mandate if a law needs interpretation because it has contradictions?
Ambush Hunters 1 year ago

Parliament and Speaker rather has no final authority to interprete the constitution. Only the Supreme Court can, and that authority can not be usurp if the interpretation is contested at the Supreme Court.

Parliament and Speaker rather has no final authority to interprete the constitution. Only the Supreme Court can, and that authority can not be usurp if the interpretation is contested at the Supreme Court.