Interference or Checks and Balances?: 5 times the Supreme Court has ‘overruled’ decisions of Parliament

Read Article

Comments (39)

This article is closed for comments.

Read Comments Comments (39)

Maalu 1 year ago

All these under Addo guy guy

All these under Addo guy guy
Errortorial Commission of Ghana -EC 1 year ago

and CJ Getrocious Tookenooo!

and CJ Getrocious Tookenooo!
Rex 1 year ago

What is checks and balances? Who checks government? They do what pleases them, didn't they pass E levy by force even after majority of Ghanaians objected to it?,who checks the judiciary? They equally do what pleases them(Who ...
read full comment

What is checks and balances? Who checks government? They do what pleases them, didn't they pass E levy by force even after majority of Ghanaians objected to it?,who checks the judiciary? They equally do what pleases them(Who will go and overturn Torkonoo's verdict?) They practically do what they please there, so I need not tell you this is interference.
YSL 1 year ago

Let them take you that court and be having an annoying looking face, your face alone can irritate a judge to hand you a sentence that no one can go and over turn it, unless u are fortunate to have a helper who will be ready t ...
read full comment

Let them take you that court and be having an annoying looking face, your face alone can irritate a judge to hand you a sentence that no one can go and over turn it, unless u are fortunate to have a helper who will be ready to file for an appeal for you, even that wouldn't give u an automatic guarantee of victory, Nobody checks them, they do what pleases them, hence being able to take a goat and set not any mere criminal than armed robber free, nobody check them in that supreme Court, they do what they please, they have just joined power with government to persecute and interfere in Bagbins and the NDC:s affairs in parliament,simply because they see his position as a mistake.They don't interfere in parliamentary business, they are only used to subvert laws in favour of the Npp, so they interfere in issues which is beneficial to the Npp bit hitherto would have gone the other side. It's a one sided interference. Remember they can set a murderer free and jail an innocent person freely without hindrances from anybody, so there isn't anything like checks and balances, it's inexistent. Abuse of power is wat is being displayed.
BAGBIN MEANS A BAG OF SHIT 1 year ago

He wants the whole world to know he has power. Those before him executed their jobs without the attitude this man is showing. Speaker of Ghana Parliament and so he's a god. This man and his new wife should be investigated for ...
read full comment

He wants the whole world to know he has power. Those before him executed their jobs without the attitude this man is showing. Speaker of Ghana Parliament and so he's a god. This man and his new wife should be investigated for murder. The woman could have killed her Sister. BAGBIN means a bag of faeces. He could have eliminated his wife to marry her younger Sister.
Tino 1 year ago

Who granted the montie three from the prison?

Who granted the montie three from the prison?
Logorligi 1 year ago

But why do people even bother commenting about this so-called Supreme Court? Unless day turns to night, the orgy of injustice will end in at most 3 weeks and Ghana will be free again from these constitutional coup-makers.

But why do people even bother commenting about this so-called Supreme Court? Unless day turns to night, the orgy of injustice will end in at most 3 weeks and Ghana will be free again from these constitutional coup-makers.
M.T 1 year ago

E levy wasn't a human right issue. Neither does it contradict any provision of the constitution. The constitution says only the high court has jurisdiction to determine vacant seats in parliament. Only after that can the spea ...
read full comment

E levy wasn't a human right issue. Neither does it contradict any provision of the constitution. The constitution says only the high court has jurisdiction to determine vacant seats in parliament. Only after that can the speaker declare the seats vacant. So, which part of the constitution gives the speaker the authority to make the kind of ruling he made? Organs of government enjoys separation of powers as long as they don't transgress their limits set by the constitution. The Supreme Court is not the police, they rule only on cases under their jurisdiction which are brought before them. If the executive does something that you believe is against the constitution its your right to go to the Supreme Court for interpretation.
Joyce 1 year ago

If you have a dangerous person as a president and a party footsoldier as the chief justice who is surrounded by party members as judges.

If you have a dangerous person as a president and a party footsoldier as the chief justice who is surrounded by party members as judges.
KK 1 year ago

Isn't this Bagbin thr guy who impregnates his underage sister in law. Ad in his wife's young sister who was living with them? Now masquerading as an honorable man??? It seems people have forgotten about his abominable conduct ...
read full comment

Isn't this Bagbin thr guy who impregnates his underage sister in law. Ad in his wife's young sister who was living with them? Now masquerading as an honorable man??? It seems people have forgotten about his abominable conduct.
Who are we kidding in this country?

Jahh 1 year ago

Ok he his still a speaker of paliatment U like U can hang your self .

Ok he his still a speaker of paliatment U like U can hang your self .
Solo 1 year ago

Akufu-Addo killed his first wife.
Akufu-Addo killed his friend and married his wife Rebecca

Akufu-Addo killed his first wife.
Akufu-Addo killed his friend and married his wife Rebecca
Patriot 1 year ago

So what action did you take against him if he purportedly committed a 'crime'?

It has been explained time without number that the Speaker did not commit any crime and yet detractors like you who despise the speaker continu ...
read full comment

So what action did you take against him if he purportedly committed a 'crime'?

It has been explained time without number that the Speaker did not commit any crime and yet detractors like you who despise the speaker continue to spew nonsense and rubbish.

Bagbin is a strong man and will resist the tyranny of the Executive and the judiciary combined. He is a true son of the North.
Now Now 1 year ago

Pyrrhic Victory
The SC and NPP are speculating on the possible grinding to a halt of Government Machinery because of non-approval of the budget for first quarter of 2025. WHERE IS THE PROPOSED BUDGET???

Pyrrhic Victory
The SC and NPP are speculating on the possible grinding to a halt of Government Machinery because of non-approval of the budget for first quarter of 2025. WHERE IS THE PROPOSED BUDGET???
WHY IS IT ONLY HAPPENING UNDER NANA ADDO NPP GOV 1 year ago

WHY IS THE INTERFERENCE BY THE SUPREME COURT ONLY HAPPENING UNDER NANA ADDO NPP GOVERNMENT???WHY DIDN'T ANY INTERFERENCE HAPPEN UNDER THE NDC GOVERNMENT TIME IN POWER???

WHY IS THE INTERFERENCE BY THE SUPREME COURT ONLY HAPPENING UNDER NANA ADDO NPP GOVERNMENT???WHY DIDN'T ANY INTERFERENCE HAPPEN UNDER THE NDC GOVERNMENT TIME IN POWER???
Jimbo 1 year ago

As far as the Speaker is a member of the opposition and his judgements are influenced by his inclination to his opposition NDC, the Supreme Court will continue to intervene anytime anyday he treads on slippery grounds. Until ...
read full comment

As far as the Speaker is a member of the opposition and his judgements are influenced by his inclination to his opposition NDC, the Supreme Court will continue to intervene anytime anyday he treads on slippery grounds. Until we see the wisdom in choosing the speaker by government in power as was done in the past, the court will seem to be in bed with government bcos whatever decisions the court will take will correct the mistakes of the opposition speaker of parliament.
Joyce 1 year ago

See this embecile NPP foot soldier. Did Bagbin create the standing orders by himself? Or is NPP for LGBTQ+

See this embecile NPP foot soldier. Did Bagbin create the standing orders by himself? Or is NPP for LGBTQ+
Beautiful Nonsense 1 year ago

It may seem good in the eyes of some today (currently) but, posterity (karma) will judge tomorrow (future).

Madam Chief Justice, your title "Justice" is tainted and questionable! And I am afraid, you and your panel of Just ...
read full comment

It may seem good in the eyes of some today (currently) but, posterity (karma) will judge tomorrow (future).

Madam Chief Justice, your title "Justice" is tainted and questionable! And I am afraid, you and your panel of Justices are already in the annals of Ghana!!

Thanks be to God for this Hung Parliament, and under Akufo-Addo/ Bawumia tenure! It's very good case study for our democracy (the Executive, the Legislative, and the Judiciary). We, the people are watching a whole lot!
Marcus Adepaye 1 year ago

Brethren all we have to understand is that the Supreme Court is clothed with all the powers and mandate to interprete and resolve all disputes or misunderstanding in the application of the constitution to our governing of our ...
read full comment

Brethren all we have to understand is that the Supreme Court is clothed with all the powers and mandate to interprete and resolve all disputes or misunderstanding in the application of the constitution to our governing of our nation. The subject in question is the CONSTITUTION and which l believe parliament has no business in interpreting any of the provisions contained in our constitution!!! To avoid any ambiguity which might emanate from other provisions of the constitution that also has every tendency to conflict with the powers given the Supreme Court in its duty, we all should allow the Supreme Court to basically function as enshrined in the constitution with that duty. The alternative as we see today should only be done by allowing for a Judicial Review if there's any misunderstanding that emanates from the ruling given by the Supreme Court in interpreting the provisions of the constitution.
Efo Kwame 1 year ago

Why the CJ didn't direct Afenyo to the High Court because that is what is in Constitution before the SC? But they chose to handle it themselves. Isn't it a breach of your Constitution Marcus? We live to see with this useless ...
read full comment

Why the CJ didn't direct Afenyo to the High Court because that is what is in Constitution before the SC? But they chose to handle it themselves. Isn't it a breach of your Constitution Marcus? We live to see with this useless bidding... ..

Kweku 1 year ago

Efo kwame, the issue in dispute is not about the validity or otherwise of the election of a member of parliament which the high court has jurisdiction. It was about the meaning of the constitution relative to the vacation of ...
read full comment

Efo kwame, the issue in dispute is not about the validity or otherwise of the election of a member of parliament which the high court has jurisdiction. It was about the meaning of the constitution relative to the vacation of seat by a member of parliament. The supreme court has the sole jurisdiction when it comes to meaning of provisions in the constitution irrespective of the subject matter. In ex parte Zanetor the court applied this principle to determine the question of who is candidate for office of member of parliament
Paul 1 year ago

Kweku, sorry you're wasting your time with people like Efo. Just allow him to fry in his ignorance.

Kweku, sorry you're wasting your time with people like Efo. Just allow him to fry in his ignorance.
MAKOLA no 2 MARKET! 1 year ago

YAWA 8TH PARLIAMENT,
HALLUCINATIONS NKOAAA

YAWA 8TH PARLIAMENT,
HALLUCINATIONS NKOAAA
Goodwin 1 year ago

As part of the checks and balances among the arms of government in the constitution, the question is who checks the judiciary? Who or which institution can reverse an erroneous judgement by the courts. All what we are told is ...
read full comment

As part of the checks and balances among the arms of government in the constitution, the question is who checks the judiciary? Who or which institution can reverse an erroneous judgement by the courts. All what we are told is that the court has spoken and that is final and we must accept the court verdict regardless of the unreasonableness of the verdict. This is what is eroding the fortunes of our democracy.
THE SECOND HAND PRESIDENT WILL LOOSE AGAIN 1 year ago

BECAUSE THE SUPREME COURT IS SUPREME

BECAUSE THE SUPREME COURT IS SUPREME
JABS 1 year ago

Your article is as poor as nothing.. it does relate to exactly what is happening in parliamentary rule and regulations. The comparisons of intervention by the SC. is null and void.

Your article is as poor as nothing.. it does relate to exactly what is happening in parliamentary rule and regulations. The comparisons of intervention by the SC. is null and void.
Allan 1 year ago

He is just a tyrant. Mahama is manipulating his egos

He is just a tyrant. Mahama is manipulating his egos
Joeman 1 year ago

Another Rawlings will come and cleanse the system again. I now understand why the judges were killed. Very corrupt

Another Rawlings will come and cleanse the system again. I now understand why the judges were killed. Very corrupt
Asídu Keta 1 year ago

I don't understand people with conflict in this. The framers of the constitution wanted to avoid parliamentarians who decíde in parliament to changé positions from majority to minority or vice versa just like that. To make ...
read full comment

I don't understand people with conflict in this. The framers of the constitution wanted to avoid parliamentarians who decíde in parliament to changé positions from majority to minority or vice versa just like that. To make it difficult you go out to be voted again. Bagbin should have been his own man and not copy Oquaye.
Asantehene 1 year ago

What is the net effect of the 5-2 ruling? Parliament is still not sitting, I thought the chief justice will come and perform the duties of Parliament because she is so worried Parliament is not sitting and that we are in cons ...
read full comment

What is the net effect of the 5-2 ruling? Parliament is still not sitting, I thought the chief justice will come and perform the duties of Parliament because she is so worried Parliament is not sitting and that we are in constitutional crisis!!!! Yes etsɔkple li na avu

nii 1 year ago

u forget the national identity issue?

u forget the national identity issue?
Citizen Vigilante 1 year ago

Poorest article I've seen.
Check
Mesima v AG
NPP v IGP
Kpebu No 1 v AG
Tuffour v AG
JH Mensah V AG

Poorest article I've seen.
Check
Mesima v AG
NPP v IGP
Kpebu No 1 v AG
Tuffour v AG
JH Mensah V AG
Adu 1 year ago

Supreme never by itself strike down any law as unconstitutional unless a person brings it up to them for interpretation

Supreme never by itself strike down any law as unconstitutional unless a person brings it up to them for interpretation
Hannan 1 year ago

~ Hot girls are waiting for you on == www.Hot4.eu

~ Hot girls are waiting for you on == www.Hot4.eu
Meet Russian hacker base in uk all bank loading cc top fixed crdit score 1 year ago

: Bank wire transfer to all countries
We are sending wire transfer and direct flashing to any country
Chase wasap him 0 04 47853053870

Capital one bank
PNC
Access bank
TD bank
And other banks accepted
Bank f ...
read full comment

: Bank wire transfer to all countries
We are sending wire transfer and direct flashing to any country
Chase wasap him 0 04 47853053870

Capital one bank
PNC
Access bank
TD bank
And other banks accepted
Bank flashing to all countries
Bank flashing stays in the account for 28 days before it disappears and it's transferrable

We have a very experienced engineer working on these now

Bitcoin flashing to all country

Direct deposit bank loading to America, Loading
Debit card and credit load contact 00447853053870 hamzaben
Asafa 1 year ago

Oh Ghana! What a disappointment is this? The language of the constitution is so clear that a primary school student can understand it. Now we are talking about judges who are supposed to protect the constitution.

Oh Ghana! What a disappointment is this? The language of the constitution is so clear that a primary school student can understand it. Now we are talking about judges who are supposed to protect the constitution.
Bin TheBag 1 year ago

Throw the the Bag into the Bin, it is a garbage.This man has become too pompous and determined,to throw Ghana into chaos.Speaker Bag Bin, note that without the support of the Akan people, the King makers of our country,you ...
read full comment

Throw the the Bag into the Bin, it is a garbage.This man has become too pompous and determined,to throw Ghana into chaos.Speaker Bag Bin, note that without the support of the Akan people, the King makers of our country,you can never realise your hidden political ambitions if you incur the displeasure of the King Makers. Anyway, Ghana must always come first in all you do.
Saint 1 year ago

Why not examine the legal arguments. The number of time doesn't matter. If you keep gone to the SC with bogus legal justification 100 times you can't expect to be compensated with a favourable every now and then to stich and ...
read full comment

Why not examine the legal arguments. The number of time doesn't matter. If you keep gone to the SC with bogus legal justification 100 times you can't expect to be compensated with a favourable every now and then to stich and sooth your bleeding wounds. Do the right and stoop the bravado and sense of entitlement. The SC doesn't not pamper lawlessness
Paul 1 year ago

Please Hon. Speaker you know and understand that neither the President nor the Judiciary is holding the Bill. You just want to create public disaffection towards them. You very well know there are suits brought by bona-fide G ...
read full comment

Please Hon. Speaker you know and understand that neither the President nor the Judiciary is holding the Bill. You just want to create public disaffection towards them. You very well know there are suits brought by bona-fide Ghanaians in court on the Bill which must be addressed first. Do you want the President to override the suit so you can get him crucified? You always seem to hold yourself in competition with the President. Please count yourself lucky, for you couldn't have come this far but for circumstances. "Di wo lane mu" Sorry, your number 3 position will remain on paper

39 Comments

Welcome,

SIGN IN

Welcome,

RESET PASSWORD

Hello,

Terms and conditions

REGISTER

Interference or Checks and Balances?: 5 times the Supreme Court has ‘overruled’ decisions of Parliament

Read Comments .st0{display:none;fill:#14BDD3;} .st1{display:none;} .st2{display:inline;fill:#FC0F0F;} .st3{display:inline;fill:#FFFFFF;} .st4{display:inline;fill:none;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:6;stroke-miterlimit:10;} Comments (39)

Read Comments Comments (39)