FLASHBACK: I will review Article 71, scrap ex-gratia - John Mahama

Read Comments Comments (13)

• Cooler Haigh 7 months ago

  Over to you, JM, put your money where your mouth asap!

  Over to you, JM, put your money where your mouth asap!

  reply
• DEAD GOAT MAHALIAR IS BACK 7 months ago

  Inconsistent president…Atopahene can never scrap ex-gratia.

  Inconsistent president…Atopahene can never scrap ex-gratia.

  reply
• Anti Ghana NPP 7 months ago

  Stop smoking w.ee.

  Stop smoking w.ee.

  reply
• Jim 7 months ago

  Ironically, some officials who are paid these outrageous are the most corrupt, with their corruption radiating to their subordinates who brazenly and annoyingly ask to be paid for services for which they are being paid for. I ...
  read full comment

  Ironically, some officials who are paid these outrageous are the most corrupt, with their corruption radiating to their subordinates who brazenly and annoyingly ask to be paid for services for which they are being paid for. It's good riddance Mahama wants to review this. Some of these officials with such huge salaries, free government vehicle, house help and other incentives live like royals, while majority of Ghanaians just exist on the fringes. Only God knows what kind of special jobs they do in their offices to be paid such returns.

  reply
• Fluid 7 months ago

  This Ghana web is an npp mouthpiece looking their utterances

  This Ghana web is an npp mouthpiece looking their utterances

  reply
• Hannan 7 months ago

  !!!!!!!! Welcome to the best adult dating site >>> Fun4.top

  !!!!!!!! Welcome to the best adult dating site >>> Fun4.top

  reply
• Koti 7 months ago

  To ensure fairness, the TUC must insist that all those working for the state should be paid using the national basic wage as a factor. Example: the president pay could be calculated as Basic wage x 200; vice president as Basi ...
  read full comment

  To ensure fairness, the TUC must insist that all those working for the state should be paid using the national basic wage as a factor. Example: the president pay could be calculated as Basic wage x 200; vice president as Basic wage x 150, MP Basic wage x 100, etc. In that case politicians cannot arbitrary increase the emoluments and the workforce behind.

  reply
• Yoko 7 months ago

  Thank you for your words of wisdom

  Thank you for your words of wisdom

  reply
• Kweku 7 months ago

  Ghanaian politicians are hypocrites and deceptive
  When they are im opposition they say one but when in power they say another thing

  Ghanaian politicians are hypocrites and deceptive
  When they are im opposition they say one but when in power they say another thing

  reply
• Northern Boy 7 months ago

  Trust John mahama to fulfil a promise as huge as this. He'll not fail Ghanaians on this one

  Trust John mahama to fulfil a promise as huge as this. He'll not fail Ghanaians on this one

  reply
• Tweaa 7 months ago

  People taking this huge monies as salaries when the Government can’t afford to buy equipment’s for teaching hospitals

  People taking this huge monies as salaries when the Government can’t afford to buy equipment’s for teaching hospitals

  reply
• Pelicles. 7 months ago

  When a former president told Ghanaians that we are sitting on money, what was the response from Ghanaians, unrelenting and uncouth insults was directed at that president. Now, how can an economy that was in tatters increase s ...
  read full comment

  When a former president told Ghanaians that we are sitting on money, what was the response from Ghanaians, unrelenting and uncouth insults was directed at that president. Now, how can an economy that was in tatters increase salaries etc to such levels.
  
  John Mahama is a walking contradiction, and you trust him at your own peril. Mahama told Ghanaians that NPP and Nana Addo had destroyed Ghana's economy beyond repairs so, where did he get the money to make such increment possible? Remember he has been in office less than six months.

  reply
• Kay de 7 months ago

  Mahama is a scam

  Mahama is a scam

  reply