Menu

Audit Service rejects UTAG-UG compensation claims

This article is closed for comments.

Read Comments Comments (7)

  • Ochee-Do-Chee 7 months ago

    For a long time, Ghanaian Institutions including the Academics have justified and accepted expenses without supporting documents or receipts. A practice that encourages corruption and showed its ugly head in Kwesi Nyantakyi' ...
    read full comment

  • Kweku 7 months ago

    Is it a crime for an institution to use its IGF to pay critical staff when government subvention is dwindling and it's affecting the quality of university education?

  • 123 7 months ago

    Go and ask insiders at Fair Wages and Controller whether they believe the UG audit report. They will tell you they are not surprised about the rot in UG. Send all the UG staff to the Controller payroll. That's the only way to ...
    read full comment

  • Kofi Akwetey 7 months ago

    The AG is wrong. International best practice requires the auditor to give the audited institution a chance to respond to preliminary findings before going public. The AG in Ghana has been abusing its authority to villify ins ...
    read full comment

  • moonstone 7 months ago

    You can say all you want. The auditors did a very good auditing before arriving at their conclusion. Whether international standard or not, they were found to overstating compensation claims period.

  • Atarah 7 months ago

    Which part of the International Standards allows an auditor to conclude on an "adverse" finding without clarification?

  • moonstone 7 months ago

    They should face the laws of the land period.