Parliament, CHRAJ, SSNIT, others fined about GH¢5.6m for RTI violations

Read Comments Comments (4)

• prophet mohammed was a sick dog 7 months ago

  Say no to islam and convert to a real religion.
  Allah is satanic scum and qur'an is toilet paper..........Search online for ways to move away from evil islam. You can join ex-muslim groups online and be safe.........you ...
  read full comment

  Say no to islam and convert to a real religion.
  Allah is satanic scum and qur'an is toilet paper..........Search online for ways to move away from evil islam. You can join ex-muslim groups online and be safe.........you are not alone.

  reply
• EMP 7 months ago

  This guy too,why? So you won't stop your attacks against Islam? May Almighty Allah forgive and guide you.

  This guy too,why? So you won't stop your attacks against Islam? May Almighty Allah forgive and guide you.

  reply
• EMP 7 months ago

  But why refuse to give the information to the tax payer? What at all is the difficulty. I hope the president will take action and call these CEOs to order..abaah!

  But why refuse to give the information to the tax payer? What at all is the difficulty. I hope the president will take action and call these CEOs to order..abaah!

  reply
• Andrew Asare-Nyako 4 days ago

  I understand that an amendment to the RTI law may require Information Officers to personally bear fines imposed for non-compliance. If true, care must be taken to ensure that the system does not unintentionally create incenti ...
  read full comment

  I understand that an amendment to the RTI law may require Information Officers to personally bear fines imposed for non-compliance. If true, care must be taken to ensure that the system does not unintentionally create incentives for further obstruction or institutional shielding.
  
  Where significant interests are involved, there is a risk that penalties imposed solely on individual officers may not necessarily improve transparency or accountability in practice. For example, there may be situations where external interests indirectly absorb the consequences of non-compliance, thereby weakening the intended deterrent effect.
  
  For this reason, I believe responsibility should be shared institutionally. A first serious or unjustified denial of access to information could trigger disciplinary consequences, reassignment from the Information Officer role, and partial financial liability. The institution itself should also bear part of the penalty so that accountability extends to leadership and organisational culture.
  
  In addition, the RTI Commission should maintain a current public register of defaulting institutions online for easy public access. The register should include details of non-compliance, the relevant Information Officers, and the heads of the affected institutions. Transparency itself can be a powerful accountability mechanism.

  reply